Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
9. Estimates of the Error of Averaging Method for Multipoint Problems in Critical Case
In this section, we consider a multipoint problem of the form
dx
dτ
= a(x, τ, ε) + εA(x, ϕ, τ, ε),
dϕ
dτ
= ω(x, τ, ε)
ε
+ B(x, ϕ, τ, ε), (9.1)
F(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε) = 0, (9.2)
Φ(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ϕ|τ=τ1, . . . , ϕ|τ=τr, ε) = 0, (9.3)
where F(p1, . . . , pr, ε) and Φ(p1, . . . , pr, q1, . . . , qr, ε) are, respectively, n-dimensional
and m-dimensional vector functions of the variables pj ∈ D, qj ∈
Rm, j = 1, r, and ε ∈ (0, ε0], and 0 ≤ τ1 < τ2 < ... < τr ≤ L, r ≥ 2.
The main difference between this problem and problem (8.1), (8.3) lies in the
fact that, first, in problem (9.1)–(9.3) the group of boundary conditions dependent
only on slow variables is selected, and, second, in conditions (9.3) the function Φ
depends only on the arguments ϕ|τ=τj , whereas in conditions (8.3) it depends on
εϕ|τ=τj .
We also consider the corresponding averaged problem
dx
dτ
= a(x, τ, ε) + εA(x, τ, ε), F(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε) = 0, (9.4)
dϕ
dτ
= ω(x, τ, ε)
ε
+ B(x, τ, ε),
Φ(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr , ϕ|τ=τ1, . . . , ϕ|τ=τr, ε) = 0 (9.5)
and assume that there exists a solution x = x(τ, y0, ε) of problem (9.4) for which
the matrix
P1(y0, ε) =
_r
j=1
∂F0
∂pj
∂x(τj, y0, ε)
∂y0
satisfies the inequality
_P
−1
1 (y0, ε)_ ≤ c12ε
−α1 ∀ε(0, ε0] (9.6)
where c12 > 0 and α1 ≥ 0 are certain constants. Here,
∂F0
∂pj
denotes the
matrix of the partial derivatives of the function F(p1, . . . , pr, ε) with respect to
pj = (p(1)
j , . . . , p(n)
j ) for pν = x(τν, y0, ε), ν = 1, r.
100 Averaging Method in Multipoint Problems Chapter 2
To solve problem (9.5), it suffices to solve the equation
Φ(x(τ1, y0, ε), . . . , x(τr, y0, ε), ψ
+
1
ε
_τ1
0
[ω(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε) + εB(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε)]dt, . . . , ψ
+
1
ε
_τr
0
[ω(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε) + εB(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε)]dt, ε) = 0
with respect to ψ. Assume that there exists a unique solution ψ = ψ0(ε) of this
equation, i.e., there exists a unique solution
ϕ(τ, y0, ψ0, ε) = ψ0 +
_τ
0
_
ω(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε) + εB(x(t, y0, ε), t, ε)
_
dt
of problem (9.5). We also assume that the matrix
P2(y0, ψ0, ε) =
_r
j=1
∂Φ0
∂qj
satisfies the inequality
_P
−1
2 (y0, ψ0, ε)_ ≤ c13ε
−α2, c13 > 0, α2 ≥ 0, (9.7)
where
∂Φ0
∂qj
denotes the matrix of the partial derivatives of Φ(p1, . . . , qr, ε) with
respect to qj = (q(1)
j , . . . , q(m)
j ) for pν = x(τν, y0, ε) and qν = ϕ(τν, y0, ψ0, ε),
ν = 1, r.
If the numbers α1 and α2 in inequalities (9.6) and (9.7) are positive, then
the norms of the matrices P
−1
1 and P
−1
2 may tend to infinity as ε → 0. It is
natural to call this case critical. Below, we study the question of the solvability of
problem (9.1)–(9.3) in the critical case and establish estimates for the deviation of
solutions of the original and averaged problems.
In what follows, we assume that, for every fixed ε ∈ (0, ε0], the functions
F(p1, . . . , pr, ε) and Φ(p1, . . . , qr, ε) are twice continuously differentiable with
respect to pj ∈ D and qj ∈ Rm, j = 1, r, and
Section 9 Estimates of Error of Averaging Method for Multipoint Problems 101
_r
j=1
____ ∂F
∂pj
___
+
_r
ν=1
_n
k=1
___
∂2F
∂pj∂p(k)
ν
___
_
≤ c14,
_r
j=1
_
ε
___
∂Φ
∂pj
___
+
___
∂Φ
∂qj
___
+
_r
ν=1
_m
s=1
_
ε
___
∂2Φ
∂pj∂q(s)
ν
___
+
___
∂2Φ
∂qj∂q(s)
ν
___
__
≤ c14 (9.8)
for all pj ∈ D, qj ∈ Rm, j = 1, r, and ε ∈ (0, ε0].
Theorem 9.1. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) for every ε ∈ (0, ε0], the averaged problem (9.4), (9.5) has a unique solution
(x(τ, y0, ε), ϕ(τ, y0, ψ0, ε)) whose slow variables x(τ, y0, ε) belong
to D together with their ρ-neighborhoods;
(ii) conditions (8.2), (8.7), and (9.6)–(9.8) for α > α1 + 2α2 are satisfied.
Then, for sufficiently small ε0 > 0 and every ε ∈ (0, ε0], problem (9.1)–(9.3)
has a unique solution (x(τ, ε); ϕ(τ, ε)) that satisfies the following inequalities for
any τ ∈ [0, L]:
_x(τ, ε) − x(τ, y0, ε)_ ≤ c15ε1+α−α1 ,
_ϕ(τ, ε) − ϕ(τ, y0, ψ0, ε)_ ≤ c15εα−α1−α2 ,
(9.9)
where the constant c15 does not depend on ε.
Proof. We determine the unknown parameters (y; ψ) of the solution
(x(τ, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε); ϕ(τ, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε)) of system (9.1) from conditions
(9.2) and (9.3). We rewrite (9.2) in the form
y = −P
−1
1 (y0, ε)
__
F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , x(τr, y0 + y, ε), ε) − P1(y0, ε)y
_
+
_
F(x(τ1, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε), . . . , x(τr, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε), ε)
− F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , x(τr, y0 + y, ε), ε)
__
≡ T(y, ψ, ε). (9.10)
Using the estimate of the error of the averaging method (8.8) and inequalities
(9.8), we obtain
102 Averaging Method in Multipoint Problems Chapter 2
_F(x(τ1, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε), . . . , ε) − F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , ε)_
≤ c4c14rε1+α. (9.11)
Further, using representations (8.13), inequalities (9.8), and condition (9.4), we
get
F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , ε) = P1(y0, ε)y + _ F(y, ε),
where _ _ F(y, ε)_ ≤ c16_y_2 and c16 = const. Using this equality and inequalities
(9.6) and (9.9), we obtain the following estimate for T(y, ψ, ε):
_T(y, ψ, ε)_ ≤ c12(c4c14r + c16_y_2ε
−1−α)ε1+α−α1 .
This estimate implies that T(y, ψ, ε) maps the set
_y_ ≤ c17ε1+α−α1, c17 = 2rc4c12c14,
into itself for
ε ≤ ε0 ≤ (4c4c2
12c14c16r)
1
2α1
−1−α, ψ∈ Rm.
Let us calculate
∂T
∂y
. We have
∂T
∂y
= −P
−1
1 (y0, ε)
___r
j=1
∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , ε)
× ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + y, ε) − P1(y0, ε)
_
+
__r
j=1
_ ∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε), . . . , ε) ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + y,ψ0 + ψ, ε)
− ∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , ε) ∂
∂y
x (τj, y0 + y, ε)
__
. (9.12)
In view of inequalities (8.8) and (9.8), the norm of the matrix in the second square
brackets on the right-hand side of (9.12) can be estimated from above by the value
c18εα, c18 = const. Using (8.16) and writing the equality
Section 9 Estimates of Error of Averaging Method for Multipoint Problems 103
_r
j=1
∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + y, ε), . . . , ε) ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + y, ε)
=
_r
j=1
_∂F0
∂pj
+ Fj(y, ε)
__ ∂
∂y0 x(τj, y0, ε) + _X (τj, y, ε)
_
≡ P1(y0, ε) + K(y, ε),
where _K(y, ε)_ ≤ c19_y_, c19 = const, we can estimate the norm of the
matrix in the first square brackets on the right-hand side of equality (9.12) by the
value c20_y_, c20 = const. Thus,
___
∂
∂y
T(y, ψ, ε)
___
≤ c12ε
−α1(c18εα + c20_y_) ≤ 1
2
for α > α1, _y_ ≤ c17ε1+α−α1, ψ ∈ Rm, and ε ≤ ε0 ≤ [2c12(c18 +
c17c20)]
1
α1
−α . Consequently, Eq. (9.10) has a unique solution y = y(ψ, ε),
_y(ψ, ε)_ ≤ c17ε1+α−α1 , which can be determined by the method of successive
approximations:
yk+1(ψ, ε) = T(yk(ψ, ε), ψ, ε), k≥ 1,
y0(ψ, ε) ≡ 0, y(ψ, ε) = lim
k→∞
yk(ψ, ε).
Using equality (9.10), we get
∂yk(ψ, ε)
∂ψ
= ∂
∂ψ
T(yk−1(ψ, ε), ψ, ε)
= −P
−1
1 (y0, ε)
___r
j=1
∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + yk−1, ε), . . . , ε)
× ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + yk−1, ε)∂yk−1
∂ψ
− P1(y0, ε)∂yk−1
∂ψ
_
+
__r
j=1
_ ∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + yk−1, ψ0 + ψ, ε), . . . , ε)
104 Averaging Method in Multipoint Problems Chapter 2
×
_ ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + yk−1, ψ0 + ψ, ε)∂_____________yk−1
∂ψ
+ ∂
∂ψ
x(τj, y0 + yk−1, ψ, ε)
_
− ∂
∂pj
F(x(τ1, y0 + yk−1, ε), . . . , ε) ∂
∂y
x(τj, y0 + yk−1, ε)∂yk−1
∂ψ
__
.
Further, using the methods proposed in the course of the investigation of the properties
of T(y, ψ, ε), we obtain
___
∂yk(ψ, ε)
∂ψ
___
≤ c21ε1+α−α1 + c22εα−α1
___
∂yk−1(ψ, ε)
∂ψ
__ _
,
where c21 and c22 are certain constants independent of ε. This yields
___
∂yk(ψ, ε)
∂ψ
___
≤ c23ε1+α−α1 ∀k ≥ 0, c23 = 2c21,
provided that ε0 ≤ (2c22)
1
α1
−α . Hence, the sequence
_ ∂
∂ψ
yk(ψ, ε)
_
is uniformly
bounded by the constant c23ε1+α−α1 . This is sufficient to guarantee that
the function y(ψ, ε) satisfies the Lipschitz condition
_y(ψ1, ε) − y(ψ2, ε)_ ≤ c23ε1+α−α1_ψ1 − ψ2_ ∀ψ1, ψ2 ∈ Rm. (9.13)
We rewrite equality (8.3) in the form
ψ = −P
−1
2 (y0, ψ0, ε){[Φ −Φ] + [Φ − P2(y0, ψ0, ε)ψ]} ≡ _ T(ψ, ε), (9.14)
where Φ = Φ(x(τ1, y0+y(ψ, ε), ψ0+ψ, ε), . . . , ϕ(τr, y0+y(ψ, ε), ψ0+ψ, ε), ε)
and Φ = Φ(x(τ1, y0 + y(ψ, ε), ε), . . . , ϕ(τr, y0 + y(ψ, ε), ψ0 + ψ, ε), ε), and
estimate each term on the right-hand side of equality (9.14). Using inequalities
(8.8) and (9.8), we get
_Φ − Φ_ ≤
_r
j=1
_1
ε
c4c14ε1+α + c4c14εα
_
= 2rc4c14εα, (9.15)
_Φ−P2(y0, ψ0, ε)ψ_
≤ rc14(ne2c1L + c24)
_y(ψ, ε)_
ε
+ rc14
_
c24
1
ε
_y(ψ, ε)_ + _ψ_
_2
,
where c24 = 2c1Lne2c1L. Taking into account that _y(ψ, ε)_ ≤ c17ε1+α−α1 ,
we finally obtain
_Φ − P2(y0, ψ0, ε)ψ_ ≤ c25(εα−α1 + _ψ_2), c25 = const. (9.16)
Section 9 Estimates of Error of Averaging Method for Multipoint Problems 105
Inequalities (9.15) and (9.16) yield
_ _ T(ψ, ε)_ ≤ c26(εα−α1−α2 + ε
−α2_ψ_2), c26 = c13(2rc4c14 + c25). (9.17)
This implies that _ T(ψ, ε) maps the set
U = {ψ: ψ ∈ Rm, _ψ_ ≤ 2c26εα−α1−α2}
into itself for α > α1 + 2α2 and 4c26εα−α1−2α2
0
≤ 1.
Let ψ(1) and ψ(2) be arbitrary points of the set U. Using the error estimates
of the averaging method (8.8) and inequalities (9.7), (9.8), and (9.13), we get
_ _ T(ψ(1), ε) − _ T(ψ(2), ε)_
≤ c27
_
εα−α1−α2 +
_r
j,ν=1
_m
s=1
sup
___
∂2Φ
∂qj∂q(s)
ν
__ _
εα−α1−
2α2
_
_ψ(1) − ψ(2)_,
(9.18)
c27 = const.
Since α > α1 +2α2, the last inequality implies that the mapping _ T : U → U is
contracting. Thus, there exists a unique solution ψ = ψ0(ε) ∈ U of Eq. (9.14),
and, hence, there exists the solution
(x(τ, ε); ϕ(τ, ε)) = (x(τ, y0 + y(ψ0(ε), ε), ψ0 + ψ0(ε), ε);
ϕ(τ, y0 + y(ψ0(ε), ε), ψ0 + ψ0(ε), ε))
of problem (9.1)–(9.3). Estimates (9.9) follow from estimates (8.8) and the inequalities
_y(ψ0(ε), ε)_ ≤ c17ε1+α−α1 , _ψ0(ε)_ ≤ 2c26εα−α1−α2 ,
and the condition c15ε1+α−α1
0
≤ 1
2ρ guarantees that x = x(τ, ε) lies in D
∀(τ, ε) ∈ [0, L] × (0, ε0]. Theorem 9.1 is proved.
Remark 5. If the vector function Φ(p1, . . . , qr, ε) in condition (9.3) linearly
depends on qj, j = 1, r, i.e.,
Φ =
_r
j=1
Aj(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε)ϕ|τ=τj + A0(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε),
106 Averaging Method in Multipoint Problems Chapter 2
then the inequality α > α1 + 2α2 in Theorem 9.1 can be weakened to the inequality
α > α1 + α2. Indeed, in this case, the analysis of inequalities (9.17)
and (9.18) shows that all conditions of the principle of contracting mappings are
satisfied for α > α1 + α2.
We apply the results obtained to the solution of the multipoint problem
dx
dτ
= P(τ )x + εA(x, ϕ, τ, ε),
dϕ
dτ
= ω(x, τ, ε)
ε
+ B(x, ϕ, τ, ε), (9.19)
_r
j=1
Aj(ε)x|τ=τj = x0(ε),
_r
j=1
Bj(ε)ϕ|τ=τj = f(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε),
(9.20)
where the right-hand sides of Eqs. (9.19) satisfy the same conditions as the righthand
sides of Eqs. (8.1), Aj(ε) and Bj(ε), j = 1, r, are uniformly bounded (by
a constant c28 ) n-dimensional and m-dimensional, respectively, square matrices,
and f(p1, . . . , pr, ε) is a function continuously differentiable with respect to
pj ∈ D, j = 1, r, for every fixed ε and such that
_f_ +
_r
j=1
___
∂f
∂pj
___
≤ 1
ε
c28 ∀pj ∈ D, j= 1, r, ε ∈ (0, ε0]. (9.21)
We write the problem averaged with respect to ϕ:
dx
dτ
= P(τ )x + εA(x, τ, ε),
_r
j=1
Aj(ε)x|τ=τj = x0(ε), (9.22)
dϕ
dτ
= ω(x, τ, ε)
ε
+ B(x, τ, ε),
_r
j=1
Bj(ε)ϕ|τ=τj = f(x|τ=τ1, . . . , x|τ=τr, ε). (9.23)
Let Q(τ, t) denote the normal fundamental matrix of the linear system
dx
dτ
=
P(τ )x.
Section 9 Estimates of Error of Averaging Method for Multipoint Problems 107
Lemma 9.1. Suppose that the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) for all ε ∈ (0, ε0],
___
__r
j=1
Aj(ε)Q(τj , 0)
_−1___ ≤ c29 = const, det
_r
j=1
Bj(ε) _= 0;
(ii) for all (τ, ε) ∈ [0, L] × (0, ε0], the curve
y(τ, ε) = Q(τ, 0)
__r
j=1
Aj(ε)Q(τj , 0)
_−1
x0(ε)
lies in D together with its ρ-neighborhood.
Then, for sufficiently small ε0 > 0 and every ε ∈ (0, ε0], there exists a
unique solution x = x(τ, ε), ϕ = ϕ(τ, ε) of the averaged problem (9.22), (9.23)
for which the curve x = x(τ, ε) lies in a certain small neighborhood of the curve
y = y(τ, ε).
Proof. Since the right-hand sides of Eqs. (9.22) are smooth, there exists a
solution x = x(τ, z + _x, ε) of the Cauchy problem
dx
dτ
= P(τ )x + εA(x, τ, ε),
x|τ=0 = z + _x,
_x =
__r
j=1
Aj(ε)Q(τj , 0)
_−1
x0(ε),
which satisfies the equality
x(τ, z + _x, ε) = y(τ, ε) + Q(τ, 0)z +
_τ
0
Q(τ, t)A(x(t, z + _x, ε), t, ε)dt.
The last relation yields
_x(τ, z + _x, ε) − y(τ, ε)_ ≤ K_z_ + εKLc1 <
1
2ρ
for _z_ ≤ ρ(4K)−1 and ε ≤ ε0 ≤ ρ(4KLc1)−1. Here, K is a constant that
bounds the norm of the matrix Q(τ, t) ∀(τ, t) ∈ [0, L] × [0, L]. This implies
108 Averaging Method in Multipoint Problems Chapter 2
that, for indicated z and ε ∈ (0, ε0], the solution x = x(τ, z + _x, ε) of the
Cauchy problem can be extended for any τ ∈ [0, L] and lies in D together with
its
1
2ρ-neighborhood.
Let us prove that z can be chosen so that the function x = x(τ, z + _x, ε) is a
solution of problem (9.22). Indeed, if the boundary conditions are satisfied, then
we get
z = −ε
__r
j=1
Aj(ε)Q(τj , 0)
_−1
_r
j=1
Aj(ε)
_τj
0
Q(τj, t)A(x(t, z + _x, ε), t, ε) dt
≡ T(z, ε). (9.24)
Taking into account the first inequality in condition (i) of the lemma and restrictions
imposed on the matrices Aj(ε), one can easily establish that T(z, ε) maps
the set of vectors z ∈ Rn such that _z_ ≤ cε, c = c1c28c29rKL, into itself,
provided that cε0 ≤ ρ(4K)−1. Moreover, using the inequality
___
∂
∂z
x(τ, z + _x, ε)
___
≤ ne2c1L,
we obtain
___
∂
∂z
T(z, ε)
___
≤ c30ε ≤ 1
2
∀ε ≤ ε0 ≤ 1
2c30
, c30 = cne2c1L.
Therefore, Eq. (9.24) has a unique solution z = z(ε) that satisfies the inequality
_z(ε)_ ≤ cε, and the boundary-value problem (9.22) has a unique solution
x(τ, ε) = x(τ, z(ε) + _x, ε) for which
_x(τ, ε) − y(τ, ε)_ < K(c + c1L)ε ∀(τ, ε) ∈ [0, L] × (0, ε0].
To obtain ϕ(τ, ε), we substitute the value of x = x(τ, ε) into (9.23). As a result,
we get
ϕ(τ, ε) =
1
ε
_τ
0
[ω(x(t, ε), t, ε) + εB(x(t, ε), t, ε)] dt
+
__r
j=1
Bj(ε)
_−1_
f(x(τ1, ε), . . . , x(τr, ε), ε)
− 1
ε
_r
j=1
Bj(ε)
_τj
0
(ω(x(t, ε), t, ε) + +εB(x(t, ε), t, ε))dt
_
.
Lemma 9.1 is proved.
Section 10 Theorems on Existence of Solutions 109
The proof of the theorem below, in fact, repeats the proof of Theorem 9.1,
and, therefore, we present only its formulation.
Theorem 9.2. Suppose that conditions (8.2), (8.7), and (9.21) and the conditions
of Lemma 9.1 are satisfied and, furthermore,
___
__r
j=1
Bj(ε)
_−1___ ≤ c31ε
−β ∀ε ∈ (0, ε0], β<α.
Then there exist constants c32 and ε0 ≤ ε0 such that, for every ε ∈ (0, ε0],
problem (9.19), (9.20) has a unique solution (x(τ, ε); ϕ(τ, ε)) that satisfies the
inequalities
_x(τ, ε) − x(τ, ε)_ ≤ c32ε1+α,
_ϕ(τ, ε) − ϕ(τ, ε)_ ≤ c32εα−β
∀(τ, ε) ∈ [0, L] × (0, ε0] .
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Fields and galois theory
- Пчеловодство
- Mathematics and art
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода