Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
4.2 Algebraic Integer Domains
Let _ 2 C be an algebraic number. If _ satisfies a monic polynomial with
integral coefficients, then _ is called an algebraic integer . More generally,
suppose that R _ S are integral domains and that _ 2 S. Say that _ is
integral over R if _ satisfies a monic polynomial in R[x]. Thus, the algebraic
integers are precisely the complex numbers which are integral over Z.
Lemma 4.2.1 Let R _ S be integral domains, and let _ 2 S. Then _ is
integral over R if and only if R[_] is a finitely generated R-module.
Note that the proof of the above actually reveals the following.:
Lemma 4.2.2 Let R _ S be integral domains. If S is a finitely generated
R-module, then every element of S is integral over R.
Lemma 4.2.3 Let R _ S _ T be integral domains. If T is a finitely generated
S-module, and if S is a finitely generated R-module, then T is a finitely
generated R-module.
As an immediate consequence we have the following proposition.
Proposition 4.2.4 Let _, _ be algebraic integers. Then __ and _ + _ are
also algebraic integers.
One could consider the ring Zalg _ C of all algebraic integers. However,
this ring doesn’t have very interesting factorization properties. For example,
Zalg has no primes. Indeed, if a 2 Zalg, then
p
a 2 Zalg. Rather than
considering all algebraic integers, it is more appropriate to consider the
following subrings of Zalg.
92 CHAPTER 4. DEDEKIND DOMAINS
Definition. Let Q _ E _ C, where [E : Q] < 1. Set
OE = {algebraic integers _|_ 2 E} = E \ Zalg.
Call the ring OE an algebraic integer domain.
Definition. Let R be an arbitrary integral domain. Say that R is integrally
closed if, whevever _ 2 F(R) and _ is integral over R, then _ 2 R.
Here F(R) is the field of fractions of the integral domain R.
The following is a sufficient, but not a necessary condition for an integral
domain to be integrally closed.
Lemma 4.2.5 If R is a u.f.d., then R is integrally closed.
Proposition 4.2.6 Let E be a field with [E : Q] < 1, and set R = OE.
(a) If _ 2 E, then n_ 2 R, for some n 2 Z.
(b) F(R) = E.
(c) R is integrally closed.
(d) R \ Q = Z.
An important class of algebraic integer domains are the quadratic integer
domains , defined as the domains of the form OE, where [E : Q] = 2. We’ll
simplify the notation slightly, as follows. First note that E = Q[
p
m], where
m is a square-free integer. Thus, denote Qm = OQ[
p
m].
Proposition 4.2.7
Qm =
(
{a + b
p
m| a, b 2 Z} if m 6_ 1(mod 4)
{a+b
p
m
2 | a, b 2 Z, a _ b(mod 2)} if m _ 1(mod 4)
Notice that the above proposition, together with Lemma 5, readily identifies
many integral domains which cannot possibly be u.f.d.’s. Indeed, if m
is square-free and satisfies m _ 1(mod 4), then the ring
R0 = {a + b
p
m|a, b 2 Z}
is properly contained in R = Qm, and yet it is clear that F(R0) = F(R).
Thus R0 is not integrally closed and hence cannot be a u.f.d.
4.2. ALGEBRAIC INTEGER DOMAINS 93
Perhaps unfortunately, not all quadratic integer domains are u.f.d.’s.
The simplest example is the ring R = Q−5, which by the above proposition
is simply the ring
Z[
p
−5] = {a + b
p
−5|a, b 2 Z}.
We already observed in Chapter 3 that R is not a u.f.d.
Unsolved Problem: Are there finitely or infinitely many real quadratic
integer domains which are also u.f.d’s?
In the next section we’ll see that an algebraic integer domain is a p.i.d
if and only if it is a u.f.d.
Exercises
1. Let F be a field and let x be indeterminate over F. Prove that the
ring R = F[x2, x3] is not integrally closed, hence is not a u.f.d.. (C.f.
Exercise 3 of Section 3.2.)
2. Prove the above assertion that if a is an algebraic integer, so is
p
a.
3. Let [E : Q] < 1, and set G = Gal(E/Q). If a 2 OE, and if _ 2 G,
then _ (a) 2 OE.
4. Show that Q−6 is not a u.f.d..
5. Let _ 2 C, and assume that f(_) = 0, for some monic polynomial
f(x) 2 Z[x]. Prove that _ is an algebraic integer.
6. Here’s another proof of the fact that if _, _ are algebraic integers,
so are _ + _ and __. Let f(x), g(x) be the minimal polynomials of
_, _, respectively. Let _1 = _, _2, . . . , _r be the roots of f(x), and let
_1 = _, _2, . . . , _s be the roots of g(x). If we set
h(x) =
Ys
j=i
f(x − _j),
then argue that h(x) is a monic polynomial Z[x]. Then show that
h(_ + _) = 0. Apply Exercise 5, above. Give a similar argument to
show that __ is also an algebraic integer.
94 CHAPTER 4. DEDEKIND DOMAINS
7. Show that if m > 0, and is square-free, then U(Qm) is infinite.
8. __ Let _ 2 C be a primitive n-th root of unity, and let E = Q[_]. Show
that OE = Z[_]. (You probably won’t get this one but give it a little
thought. You should at least see how Proposition 4.2.7 above makes
this statement true for n = 3.)
9. As we have seen, the ring Q−5 = Z[
p
−5] is not a u.f.d. Many odd
things happen in this ring. For instance, find an example of an irreducible
element _ 2 Z[
p
−5] and an element a 2 Z[
p
−5] such that
_ doesn’t divide a, but _ divides a2. (Hint: look at factorizations of
9 = 32.)
10. The following result is well-known to virtually every college student.
Let f(x) 2 Z[x], and let a
b be a rational root of f(x). If the fraction
a
b is in lowest terms, then a divides the constant term of f(x) and b
divides the leading coefficient of f(x). If we ask the same question in
the context of the ring Z[
p
−5], then the answer is negative. Indeed if
we consider the polynomial f(x) = 3x2 − 2
p
−5x − 3 2 Z[
p
−5], then
the roots are 2+
p
−5
3 and −2+
p
−5
3 . Since both 3 and ±2+
p
−5 are nonassociated
irreducible elements, then the fractions can be considered to
be in lowest terms. Yet neither of the numerators divide the constant
term of f(x).
11. We continue on the theme set in Exercise 10, above. Let R be an
integral domain with field of fractions F(R). Assume the following
condition on the domain R: Let f(x) = anxn + · · · + a0 2 R[x],
with a0, an 6= 0, and assume that a
b 2 F(R) is a fraction in lowest
terms (i.e., no common non-unit factors) satisfying the polynomial
f(x). Then a divides a0 and b divides an. Now prove that for such
a ring every irreducible element is actually prime. (Hint: Let _ 2 R
be an irreducible element and assume that _|uv, but that _ doesn’t
divide either u or v. Let uv = r_, r 2 R, and consider the polynomial
ux2 − (_ + r)x + v 2 R[x].)
12. Let K be a field such that K is the field of fractions of both R1,R2 _ K.
Must it be true that K is the field of fractions of R1 \ R2? (Hint: A
counter-example can be found in the field K = F(x).)
13. Let Q _ K be a finite algebraic extension. If K is the field of fractions
of R1,R2 _ K, prove that K is also the field of fractions of R1 \ R2.
4.2. ALGEBRAIC INTEGER DOMAINS 95
14. Again, let Q _ K be a finite algebraic extension. This time, let
{R_| _ 2 A} consist of the subrings of K having K as field of fractions.
Show that K is not the field of fractions of \_2AR_. (In fact,
\_2AR_ = Z.)
96 CHAPTER 4. DEDEKIND DOMAINS
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Fields and galois theory
- Пчеловодство
- Mathematics and art
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода