Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
5.8 Injective and Projective Modules
Let R be a ring and let P be an R-module. We say that P is projective if
every diagram of the form
M M00 0 (exact)
P
- -
?
_
_
can be embedded in a commutative diagram of the form
M M00 0 (exact)
P
- -
?
_
_
_
_
_ _+
¯_
In an entirely dual sense, the R-module I is said to be injective if every
diagram of the form
0 M0 M (exact)
I
- -
6
μ
_
can be embedded in a commutative diagram of the form
0 M0 M (exact)
I
- -
6
μ
_
Q
Q
Q Qk ¯_
We have the following simple characterization of projective modules.
Theorem 5.8.1 The following conditions are equivalent for the R-module
P.
(i) P is projective.
(ii) Every short exact sequence 0 ! M0 ! M ! P ! 0 splits.
(iii) P is a direct summand of a free R-module.
136 CHAPTER 5. MODULE THEORY
The next result gives a very important class of projective R-modules.
Assume that R is an integral domain with fraction field E. Recall from our
discussions of Dedekind domains that we defined, for any ideal I _ R,
I−1 = {_ 2 E| _I _ R}.
Recall also that the ideal I was called invertible if I−1I = R.
Theorem 5.8.2 Let R be an integral domain and let I _ R be an ideal.
(i) If I is invertible, then I is a projective R-module.
(ii) If I is a finitely generated ideal and is projective, then I is invertible.
Note that the above theorem gives a great number of interesting examples
of projective modules which aren’t free. Indeed, if R is any Dedekind
domain which isn’t a principal ideal domain then there will be non-free ideals
(cf. Exercise 12, Below) of R. However, we have seen that any ideal of
a Dedekind domain is invertible, hence is a projective R-module.
In order to obtain a characterization of injective modules we need a
concept dual to that of a free module. First, however, we need the concept
of a divisible abelian group. An abelian group D is divisible if for every
d 2 D and for every 0 6= n 2 Z, there is some c 2 D such that nc = d.
Example 1. The most obvious example of a divisible group is probably the
additive group (Q, +) of rational numbers.
Example 2. A moment’s thought should reveal that if F is any field of
characteristic 0, then (F, +) is a divisible group.
Example 3. Note that any homomorphic image of a divisible group is
divisible. Of paramount importance is the divisible group Q/Z.
Example 4. If p is a prime, the group Z(p1) is a divisible group. (You
should check this.)
The importance of divisible groups is the following.
Theorem 5.8.3 Let D be an abelian group. Then D is divisible if and only
if D is injective.
5.8. INJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE MODULES 137
Let R be a ring, and let A be an abelian group. DefineM = HomZ(R,A);
thus M is certainly an abelian group under pointwise operations. Give M
the structure of a (left) R-module via
(a · f)(b) = f(ba), a, b 2 R, f 2 M.
It is easy to check that the above recipe gives HomZ(R,A) the structure of
a left R-module. (See Exercise 10.)
The importance of the above construction is found in the following.
Proposition 5.8.4 Let R be a ring and let D be a divisible abelian group.
Then the R-module HomZ(R,D) is an injective R-module.
Recall that any free R-module is the direct sum of a number of copies
of R, and that any R-module is a homomorphic image of a free module.
We now define a cofree R-module to be the direct product (not sum!) of a
number of copies of the injective module HomZ(R,Q/Z). We then have
Proposition 5.8.5 Let M be an R-module. Then M can be embedded in
a cofree R-module.
Finally we have the analogue of Theorem 41, above.
Theorem 5.8.6 The following conditions are equivalent for the R-module
I.
(i) I is injective.
(ii) Every short exact sequence 0 ! I ! M ! M00 ! 0 splits.
(iii) I is a direct summand of a cofree R-module.
Exercises
1. Prove that the direct sum
M
i2I
Pi is projective if and only if each Pi is.
2. Prove that the direct product
Y
i2I
Ii is injective if and only if each Ii
is.
138 CHAPTER 5. MODULE THEORY
3. Let R be a ring, let A be a fixed R-module, and let _ : M ! N be a
homomorphism of R-modules. Define
__ : HomR(A,M) ! HomR(A,N),
__ : HomR(N,A) ! HomR(M,A),
by setting __(f) = _ _ f, f 2 HomR(A,M), __(f) = f _ _, f 2
HomR(N,A). Prove that __ and __ are both homomorphisms of abelian
groups. (Warning: it need not be the case that either of HomR(A,M),
HomR(M,A) is an R-module.)
4. Let P be an R-module. Prove that P is projective if and only if given
any exact sequence 0 ! M0 μ
! M _! M00 ! 0, the induced sequence
0 ! HomR(P,M0) μ_! HomR(P,M) __! HomR(P,M00) ! 0
is exact.
5. Suppose we have a sequence 0 ! M0 μ
! M _! M00 ! 0 of R-modules.
Prove that this sequence is exact if and only if the sequence
0 ! HomR(P,M0) μ_! HomR(P,M) __! HomR(P,M00) ! 0
is exact for every projective R-module P.
6. Let I be an R-module. Prove that I is injective if and only if given
any exact sequence 0 ! M0 μ
! M _! M00 ! 0, the induced sequence
0 ! HomR(M00, I) __
! HomR(M, I) μ_
! HomR(M0, I) ! 0
is exact.
7. Suppose we have a sequence 0 ! M0 μ
! M _! M00 ! 0 of R-modules.
Prove that this sequence is exact if and only if the sequence
0 ! HomR(M00, I) __
! HomR(M, I) μ_
! HomR(M0, I) ! 0
is exact for every injective R-module I.
8. Let M be an R-module. Prove that
HomR(R,M) _=R M.
5.8. INJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE MODULES 139
9. Prove that if A_, _ 2 A, is a family of abelian groups, then
HomZ(R,
Y
_2A
A_) _=R
Y
_2A
HomZ(R,A_).
10. Let M be a right R-module, and let A be an abelian group. Prove
that the scalar multiplication (r · f)(m) = f(mr), r 2 R, m 2 M, f 2
HomZ(M,A) gives HomZ(M,A) the structure of a left R-module.
11. Prove that there is a natural isomorphism of abelian groups:
HomR(M,HomZ(R,A)) _= HomZ(M,A),
where M is an R-module and A is an abelian group.
12. Let R be an integral domain in which every ideal is a free R-module.
Prove that R is a principal ideal domain.
13. Let F be a field and let R be the ring
R =
__
a b
0 c
_
| a, b, c 2 F
_
,
with left R-modules
M =
__
a
b
_
| a, b 2 F
_
and
L =
__
a
0
_
| a 2 F
_
as in Exercises 6 and 7 of Section 5.7.
(a) Prove that L is a projective R-module, but that M/L is not.
(b) If we set
I =
__
a b
0 0
_
| a, b 2 F
_
,
show that the ideal I is a projective R-module.
140 CHAPTER 5. MODULE THEORY
14. A ring for which every ideal is projective is called a hereditary ring.
In Section 4.6 we saw that every every ideal of a Dedekind domain
R is invertible. In turn, by Theorem 5.8.2 every invertible ideal is a
projective R-module. Thus, Dedekind domains are hereditary. Prove
that if F is a field, then the ring Mn(F) of n × n matrices over F is
hereditary. The same is true for the ring of lower triangular n × n
matrices over F.
15. Let A be an abelian group and let B _ A be such that A/B is infinite
cyclic. Prove that A _= A/B × B.
16. Let A be an abelian group and assume that A = H × Z1 = K × Z2
where Z1 and Z2 are infinite cyclic. Prove that H _= K. (Hint: First
H/(H \ K) _= HK/K _ A/K _= Z2 so H/(H \ K) is either trivial
or infinite cyclic. Similarly for K/(H \ K). Next A/(H \ K) _=
H/(H \ K) × Z1 and A/(H \ K) _= K/(H \ K) × Z2 so H/(H \ K)
and K/(H \K) are either both trivial (in which case H = K) or both
infinite cyclic. Thus, from Exercise 10 obtain H _= H/(H \ K) × H \
K _= K/(H \ K) × H \ K _= K, done.)
17. Prove Baer’s Criterion: Let I be an R-module and assume that for
any left ideal J _ R and any R-module homomorphism _J : J ! I,
_ extends to an R-module homomorphis _ : R ! I. Show that I is
injective. (Hint: Let M0 _ M be R-modules and assume that there
is an R-module homomorphism _ : M0 ! I. Consider the poset of
pairs (N, _N), where M0 _ N _ M and where _N extends _. Apply
Zorn’s Lemma to obtain a maximal element (N0, _0). If N0 6= M, let
m 2 M −N0 and let J = {r 2 R| rm 2 N0}; note that J is a left ideal
of R. Now what?)
18. Let R be a Dedekind domain with fraction field E. Recall that a
fractional ideal is simply a finitely-generated R-submodule of E. If
J _ E is a fractional ideal, prove that J is a projective R-module.
(Hint: As for ordinary ideals, define J−1 = {_ 2 E| _J _ R}. Using
Lemma 4.5.1 of Section 4.5, argue that J−1J = R. Now argue exactly
as in Theorem 5.8.2, (i) to prove that J is a projective R-module.)
19. Let R be a Dedekind domain with field of fractions E. If I, J _ E are
fractional ideals, and if 0 6= _ 2 HomR(I, J), prove that _ is injective.
(Hint: If J0 = im _, then argue that J0 is a projective R-module.
5.8. INJECTIVE AND PROJECTIVE MODULES 141
Therefore, One obtains I = ker _ _ J0, where J _=R J0. Why is such
a decomposition a contradition?)
20. Let R be a Noetherian domain. Prove that R is a Dedekind domain if
and only if every ideal of R is a projective R-module. (See Exercise 5
of Section 4.6.)
142 CHAPTER 5. MODULE THEORY
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Пчеловодство
- Mathematics and art
- Fields and galois theory
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода