Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
19.2 Types of Damping
There is some form of mechanical energy dissipation in any dynamic system. In the modeling of systems,
damping can be neglected if the mechanical energy that is dissipated during the time duration of interest
is small in comparison to the initial total mechanical energy of excitation in the system. Even for highly
damped systems, it is useful to perform an analysis with the damping terms neglected, in order to study
several crucial dynamic characteristics, e.g., modal characteristics (undamped natural frequencies and
mode shapes).
Several types of damping are inherently present in a mechanical system. If the level of damping that is
available in this manner is not adequate for proper functioning of the system then external damping devices
may be added either during the original design or during subsequent design modifications of the system.
Three primary mechanisms of damping are important in the study of mechanical systems. They are:
1. Internal damping (of material)
2. Structural damping (at joints and interfaces)
3. Fluid damping (through fluid – structure interactions)
Internal (material) damping results from mechanical energy dissipation within the material due to
various microscopic and macroscopic processes. Structural damping is caused by mechanical energy
dissipation resulting from relative motions between components in a mechanical structure that has
common points of contact, joints or supports. Fluid damping arises from the mechanical energy
dissipation resulting from drag forces and associated dynamic interactions when a mechanical system or
its components move in a fluid.
Two general types of external dampers may be added to a mechanical system in order to improve its
energy dissipation characteristics. They are:
1. Passive dampers
2. Active dampers
Passive dampers are devices that dissipate energy through some kind of motion, without needing an
external power source or actuators. Active dampers have actuators that need external sources of power.
They operate by actively controlling the motion of the system that needs damping. Dampers may be
considered as vibration controllers. In the present chapter, the emphasis will be on damping that is
inherently present in a mechanical system.
19.2.1 Material (Internal) Damping
Internal damping of materials originates from the energy dissipation associated with microstructure
defects, such as grain boundaries and impurities; thermoelastic effects caused by local temperature
gradients resulting from nonuniform stresses, as in vibrating beams; eddy current effects in ferromagnetic
19-2 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
materials; dislocation motion in metals; and chain
motion in polymers. Several models have been
employed to represent energy dissipation caused
by internal damping. This variety of models is
primarily a result of the vast range of engineering
materials; no single model can satisfactorily
represent the internal damping characteristics of
all materials. Nevertheless, two general types of
internal damping can be identified: viscoelastic
damping and hysteretic damping. The latter term
is actually a misnomer, because all types of
internal damping are associated with hysteresis
loop effects. The stress ðsÞ and strain ð1Þ relations
at a point in a vibrating continuum possess a
hysteresis loop, such as the one shown in
Figure 19.1. The area of the hysteresis loop gives
the energy dissipation per unit volume of the
material, per stress cycle. This is termed the perunit-
volume damping capacity, and is denoted by d: It is clear that d is given by the cyclic integral
d ¼
þ
s d1 ð19:1Þ
In fact, for any damped device, there is a corresponding hysteresis loop in the displacement – force
plane as well. In this case, the cyclic integral of force with respect to the displacement, which is the area
of the hysteresis loop, is equal to the work done against the damping force. It follows that this integral
(loop area) is the energy dissipated per cycle of motion. This is the damping capacity which, when
divided by the material volume, gives the per-unit-volume damping capacity as before.
It should be clear that, unlike a pure elastic force (e.g., a spring force), a damping force cannot be a
function of displacement ðqÞ alone. The reason is straightforward. Consider a force f ðqÞ which depends
on q alone. Then, for a particular displacement point, q; of the component the force will be the same
regardless of the direction of motion (i.e., the sign of q_ ). It follows that, in a loading and unloading cycle,
the same path will be followed in both directions of motion. Hence, a hysteresis loop will not be formed.
In other words, the net work done in a complete cycle of motion will be zero. Next consider a force f ðq; q_)
which depends on both q and q_: Then, at a given displacement point, q; the force will depend on q_ as well.
Hence, force in one direction of motion will be different from that in the opposite direction. As a result, a
hysteresis loop will be formed, which corresponds to work done against the damping force (i.e., energy
dissipation).We can conclude then that the damping force has to depend on a relative velocity, q_; in some
manner. In particular, Coulomb friction, which does not depend on the magnitude of q_; does depend on
the sign (direction) of q_:
19.2.1.1 Viscoelastic Damping
For a linear viscoelastic material, the stress – strain relationship is given by a linear differential equation
with respect to time, having constant coefficients. A commonly employed relationship is
s ¼ E1 þ Ep d1
dt ð19:2Þ
which is known as the Kelvin – Voigt model. In Equation 19.2, E is Young’s modulus and Ep is a
viscoelastic parameter that is assumed to be time independent. The elastic term E1 does not contribute
to damping, and, as noted before, mathematically, its cyclic integral vanishes. Consequently, for the
Kelvin – Voigt model, damping capacity per unit volume is
dv ¼ Ep
þ d1
dt
d1p ð19:3Þ
Stress
s
Strain e
Area = Damping Capacity
per Unit Volume
smax
emax
FIGURE 19.1 A typical hysteresis loop for mechanical
damping.
Vibration Damping 19-3
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
For a material that is subjected to a harmonic (sinusoidal) excitation, at steady state, we have
1 ¼ 1max cos vt ð19:4Þ
When Equation 19.4 is substituted in Equation 19.3, we obtain
dv ¼ pvEp12
max ð19:5Þ
Now, 1 ¼ 1max when t ¼ 0 in Equation 19.4, or when d1=dt ¼ 0: The corresponding stress, according to
Equation 19.2, is smax ¼ E1max: It follows that
dv ¼
pvEps 2
max
E2 ð19:6Þ
These expressions for dv depend on the frequency of excitation, v:
Apart from the Kelvin – Voigt model, two other models of viscoelastic damping are also commonly
used. They are, the Maxwell model given by
s þ cs
ds
dt ¼ Ep d1
dt ð19:7Þ
and the standard linear solid model given by
s þ cs
ds
dt ¼ E1 þ Ep d1
dt ð19:8Þ
It is clear that the standard linear solid model represents a combination of the Kelvin – Voigt model
and the Maxwell model, and is the most accurate of the three. But, for most practical purposes, the
Kelvin – Voigt model is adequate.
19.2.1.2 Hysteretic Damping
It was noted above that the stress, and hence the internal damping force, of a viscoelastic damping
material depends on the frequency of variation of the strain (and consequently the frequency of motion).
For some types of material, it has been observed that the damping force does not significantly depend on
the frequency of oscillation of strain (or frequency of harmonic motion). This type of internal damping is
known as hysteretic damping.
Damping capacity per unit volume ðdhÞ for hysteretic damping is also independent of the frequency of
motion and can be represented by
dh ¼ Js n
max ð19:9Þ
A simple model that satisfies Equation 19.9, for the case of n ¼ 2; is given by
s ¼ E1 þ
E~
v
d1
dt ð19:10Þ
which is equivalent to using a viscoelastic parameter, Ep ; that depends on the frequency of motion in
Equation 19.2 according to Ep ¼ E~ =v:
Consider the case of harmonic motion at frequency v; with the material strain given by
1 ¼ 10 cos vt ð19:11Þ
Then, Equation 19.10 becomes
s ¼ E10 cos vt 2 E~10 sin vt ¼ E1 cos vt þ E~10 cos vt þ
p
2
ð19:12Þ
Note that the material stress has two components, as given by the right-hand side of Equation 19.12. The
first component corresponds to the linear elastic behavior of a material and is in phase with the strain.
The second component of stress, which corresponds to hysteretic damping, is 908 out of phase. (This
stress component leads the strain by 908.) A convenient mathematical representation is possible, by using
the usual complex form of the response according to
1 ¼ 10 ejvt ð19:13Þ
19-4 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Then, Equation 19.10 becomes
s ¼ ðE þ jE~ Þ1 ð19:14Þ
It follows that this form of simplified hysteretic damping may be represented by using a complex
modulus of elasticity, consisting of a real part which corresponds to the usual linear elastic (energy
storage) modulus (or Young’s modulus) and an imaginary part which corresponds to the hysteretic loss
(energy dissipation) modulus.
By combining Equation 19.2 and Equation 19.10, a simple model for combined viscoelastic and
hysteretic damping may be given by
s ¼ E1 þ Ep þ
E~
v
!
d1
dt ð19:15Þ
The equation of motion for a system whose damping is represented by Equation 19.15 can be deduced
from the pure elastic equation of motion by simply substituting E by the operator
E þ Ep þ
E~
v
!
›
›t
in the time domain.
Example 19.1
Determine the equation of flexural motion of a nonuniform slender beam whose material has both
viscoelastic and hysteretic damping.
Solution
The Bernoulli – Euler equation of bending motion on an undamped beam subjected to a dynamic load of
f ðx; tÞ per unit length, is given by
›2
›x2 EI
›2q
›x2 þ rA
›2q
›t2 ¼ f ðx; tÞ ð19:16Þ
Here, q is the transverse motion at a distance, x; along the beam. Then, for a beam with material damping
(both viscoelastic and hysteretic) we can write
›2
›x2 EI
›2q
›x2 þ
›2
›x2 Ep þ
E~
v
!
I
›3q
›t ›x2 þ rA
›2q
›t2 ¼ f ðx; tÞ ð19:17Þ
in which v is the frequency of the external excitation f ðx; tÞ in the case of steady forced vibrations. In the
case of free vibration, however, v represents the frequency of free vibration decay. Consequently, when
analyzing the modal decay of free vibrations, v in Equation 19.17 should be replaced by the appropriate
frequency ðviÞ of modal vibration in each modal equation. Hence, the resulting damped vibratory system
possesses the same normal mode shapes as the undamped system. The analysis of the damped case is very
similar to that for the undamped system.
19.2.2 Structural Damping
Structural damping is a result of mechanical energy dissipation caused by friction due to the relative
motion between components and by impacting or intermittent contact at the joints in a mechanical
system or structure. Energy dissipation behavior depends on the details of the particular mechanical
system. Consequently, it is extremely difficult to develop a generalized analytical model that would
satisfactorily describe structural damping. Energy dissipation caused by rubbing is usually represented by
a Coulomb friction model. Energy dissipation caused by impacting, however, should be determined from
the coefficient of restitution of the two members that are in contact.
The most common method of estimating structural damping is by measurement. The measured
values, however, represent the overall damping in the mechanical system. The structural damping
component is obtained by subtracting the values corresponding to other types of damping, such as
material damping, present in the system (estimated by environment-controlled experiments, previous
data, and so forth) from the overall damping value.
Vibration Damping 19-5
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Usually, internal damping is negligible compared
to structural damping. A large proportion of
mechanical energy dissipation in tall buildings,
bridges, vehicle guideways, and many other civil
engineering structures and in machinery, such as
robots and vehicles, takes place through the
structural damping mechanism. A major form of
structural damping is the slip damping that results
from energy dissipation by interface shear at a
structural joint. The degree of slip damping that is
directly caused by Coulomb (dry) friction depends
on such factors as joint forces (for example, bolt
tensions), surface properties and the nature of the
materials of the mating surfaces. This is associated
with wear, corrosion, and general deterioration of
the structural joint. In this sense, slip damping is
time-dependent. It is a common practice to place
damping layers at joints to reduce undesirable
deterioration of the joints. Sliding causes shear
distortions in the damping layers, causing energy
dissipation by material damping and also through
Coulomb friction. In this way, a high level of
equivalent structural damping can be maintained
without causing excessive joint deterioration.
These damping layers should have a high stiffness
(as well as a high specific-damping capacity) in
order to take the structural loads at the joint.
For structural damping at a joint, the damping
force varies as slip occurs at the joint. This is
primarily caused by local deformations at the joint,
which occur with slipping. A typical hysteresis
loop for this case is shown in Figure 19.2(a). The
arrows on the hysteresis loop indicate the direction
of relative velocity. For idealized Coulomb friction,
the frictional force ðFÞ remains constant in each direction of relative motion. An idealized hysteresis loop
for structural Coulomb damping is shown in Figure 19.2(b). The corresponding constitutive relation is
f ¼ c sgnðq_Þ ð19:18Þ
in which f is the damping force, q is the relative displacement at the joint and c is a friction parameter.
A simplified model for structural damping caused by local deformation may be given by
f ¼ clqlsgnðq_Þ ð19:19Þ
The corresponding hysteresis loop is shown in Figure 19.2(c). Note that the signum function is defined by
sgnðvÞ ¼
1 for v $ 0
21 for v , 0
(
ð19:20Þ
19.2.3 Fluid Damping
Consider a mechanical component moving in a fluid medium. The direction of relative motion is shown
parallel to the y-axis in Figure 19.3. Local displacement of the element relative to the surrounding fluid is
denoted by qðx; y; tÞ:
Force
f
q
(Displacement)
(a)
Force
f
q
(Displacement)
(b)
Force
f
q
(Displacement)
(c)
FIGURE 19.2 Some representative hysteresis loops:
(a) typical structural damping; (b) Coulomb friction
model; and (c) simplified structural damping model.
19-6 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
The resulting drag force per unit area of
projection on the x – z plane is denoted by fd:
This resistance is the cause of mechanical energy
dissipation in fluid damping. It is usually
expressed as
fd ¼ 12
cdrq_2 sgnðq_Þ ð19:21Þ
in which q_ ¼ ›qðx; z; tÞ=›t is the relative velocity.
The drag coefficient, cd; is a function of the
Reynold’s number and the geometry of the
structural cross section. A net damping effect is
generated by viscous drag produced by the boundary layer effects at the fluid – structure interface, and by
pressure drag produced by the turbulent effects resulting from flow separation at the wake. The two
effects are illustrated in Figure 19.4. Fluid density is r: For fluid damping, the damping capacity per unit
volume associated with the configuration shown in Figure 19.3 is given by
df ¼
ÞðLx
0
ðLz
0
fd dz dx dqðx; z; tÞ
Lx Lz q0 ð19:22Þ
in which, Lx and Lz are cross-sectional dimensions of the element in the x and y-directions, respectively,
and q0 is a normalizing amplitude parameter for relative displacement.
Example 19.2
Consider a beam of length L and uniform rectangular cross section that is undergoing transverse
vibration in a stationary fluid. Determine an expression for the damping capacity per unit volume for
this fluid – structure interaction.
Solution
Suppose that the beam axis is along the x-direction and the transverse motion is in the z-direction. There is
no variation in the y-direction, and hence, the length parameters in this direction cancel out.
df ¼
ÞðL
0
fd dx dqðx; tÞ
Lq0
or
df ¼
ðT
0
ðL
0
fdq_ðx; tÞdx dt
Lq0 ð19:23Þ
FIGURE 19.3 A body moving in a fluid medium.
FIGURE 19.4 Mechanics of fluid damping.
Vibration Damping 19-7
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
in which T is the period of the oscillations. Assuming constant cd; we substitute Equation 19.21
into Equation 19.23:
df ¼
1
2
cdr
Lq0
ðL
0
ðT
0
lq_l3dt dx ð19:24Þ
For steady-excited harmonic vibration at frequency v and shape function QðxÞ (or for free-modal
vibration at natural frequency v and mode shape QðxÞ) we have
qðx; tÞ ¼ qmaxQðxÞ sin vt ð19:25Þ
In this case, with the change of variable u ¼ vt; Equation 19.24 becomes
df ¼ 2cdr
q3
max
Lq0
ðL
0
lQðxÞl3dx v2
ðp=2
0
cos3u du
or
df ¼
4
3
cdrq3
maxv2
ðL
0
lQðxÞl3dx
Lq0
Note. The integration interval of t ¼ 0 to T becomes u ¼ 0 to 2p or four times that from u ¼ 0 to p=2:
If the normalizing parameter is defined as
q0 ¼
1
L
qmax
ðL
0
lQðxÞl3 dx
then, we get
df ¼
4
3
cdrq2
maxv2 ð19:26Þ
A useful classification of damping is given in Box 19.1.
Box 19.1
DAMPING CLASSIFICATION
Type of Damping Origin Typical Constitutive Relation
Internal damping Material properties Viscoelastic
s ¼ E1 þ Ep d1
dt
Hysteretic
s ¼ E1 þ
E~
v
d1
dt
Structural damping Structural joints and interfaces Structural deformation
f ¼ clql sgnðq_Þ
Coulomb f ¼ c sgnðq_Þ
General interface
f ¼
fs for v ¼ 0
fsbðvÞ sgnðvÞ for v – 0
(
Fluid damping Fluid – structure interactions fd ¼ 12
cdrq_2 sgnðq_Þ
19-8 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Finite element analysis
- Mathematics and art
- Fields and galois theory
- Пчеловодство
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода