Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
3.7 Other Modal Formulations
The modal problem (eigenvalue problem) studied in the previous sections consists of the solution of
v2Mc ¼ Kc ð3:28Þ
which is identical to Equation 3.13. The natural frequencies (eigenvalues) are given by solving the
characteristic equation 3.14. The corresponding mode shape vectors (eigenvectors) ci are determined by
3-22 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
substituting each natural frequency vi into Equation 3.13 and solving for a nontrivial solution. This
solution will have at least one arbitrary parameter. Hence, c represents the relative displacements at the
various DoF of the vibrating system and not the absolute displacements. Now, two other formulations are
given for the modal problem.
The first alternative formulation given below involves the solution of the eigenvalue problem of a
nonsymmetric matrix ðM21KÞ: The other formulation given consists of first transforming the original
problem into a new set of motion coordinates, then solving the eigenvalue problem of a symmetric
matrix ðM21=2KM21=2Þ; and then transforming the resulting modal vectors back to the original
motion coordinates. Of course, all three of these formulations will give the same end result for the
natural frequencies and mode shapes of the system, because the physical problem would remain the
same regardless of what formulation and solution approach are employed. This fact will be illustrated
using an example.
3.7.1 Nonsymmetric Modal Formulation
Consider the original modal formulation given by Equation 3.28 that we have studied. Since
the inertia matrix M is nonsingular, its inverse M 21 exists. The premultiplication of Equation 3.28 by
M 21 gives
v2c ¼ M21Kc ð3:29Þ
This vector– matrix equation is of the form
lc ¼ Sc ð3:30Þ
where l ¼ v2 and S ¼ M21K: Equation 3.30 represents the standard matrix eigenvalue problem for
matrix S. It follows that
Squared natural frequencies ¼ eigenvalues of M21K
Mode shape vectors ¼ eigenvectors of M21K
3.7.2 Transformed Symmetric Modal Formulation
Now consider the free (unforced) system equations
My€ þ Ky ¼ 0 ð3:31Þ
whose modal problem needs to be solved. First, we define the square root of matrix M, as denoted by
M1=2; such that
M1=2M1=2 ¼ M ð3:32Þ
Since M is symmetric, M1=2 also has to be symmetric. Next, we define M21=2 as the inverse of M1=2:
Specifically,
M21=2M1=2 ¼ M1=2M21=2 ¼ I ð3:33Þ
where I is the identify matrix. Note that M21=2 is also symmetric.
Once M21=2 is defined in this manner, we transform the original problem 3.31 using the coordinate
transformation
y ¼ M21=2q ð3:34Þ
Modal Analysis 3-23
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Here, q denotes the transformed displacement vector, which is related to the actual displacement vector y
through the matrix transformation using M21=2:
By differentiating Equation 3.34 twice, we get
y€ ¼ M21=2 q€ ð3:35Þ
Substitute Equation 3.34 and Equation 3.35 into Equation 3.31. This gives
MM21=2 q€ þ KM21=2q ¼ 0
Premultiply this result by M21=2 and use the fact that
M21=2MM21=2 ¼ M21=2M1=2M1=2M21=2 ¼ I
which follows from Equation 3.32 and Equation 3.33. We get
q€ þ M21=2KM21=2q ¼ 0 ð3:36Þ
Equation 3.36 is the transformed problem, whose modal response may be given by
q ¼ e jvtf ð3:37Þ
where v represents a natural frequency and f represents the corresponding modal vector, as usual. Then,
in view of Equation 3.34, we have
y ¼ e jvt M21=2f ¼ e jvt c ð3:38Þ
It follows that the natural frequencies of the original problem 3.31 are identical to the natural frequencies
of the transformed problem 3.36, and the modal vectors c of the original problem are related to the
modal vectors f of the transformed problem through
c ¼ M21=2f ð3:39Þ
Substitute the modal response 3.37 into Equation 3.36. We get
lf ¼ Pf ð3:40Þ
where l ¼ v2 and P ¼ M21=2KM21=2:
Equation 3.40, just like Equation 3.30, represents a standard matrix eigenvalue problem. But now
matrix P is symmetric. As a result, its eigenvectors f will not only be real but also orthogonal.
The solution steps for the present, transformed, and symmetric modal problem are:
1. Determine M21=2:
2. Solve for eigenvalues l and eigenvectors f of M21=2KM21=2: Eigenvalues are squares of the natural
frequencies of the original system.
3. Determine the modal vectors c of the original system by using c ¼ M21=2f:
The three approaches of modal analysis which we have studied are summarized in Table 3.4.
TABLE 3.4 Three Approaches of Modal Analysis
Approach Standard Nonsymmetric
Matrix Eigenvalue
Symmetric Matrix Eigenvalue
Modal formulation ½v2 M 2 Kc ¼ 0 v2 c ¼ M21Kc v2f ¼ M21=2KM21=2f
Squared natural
frequencies ðv2i
Þ
Roots of det½v2 M 2 K ¼ 0 Eigenvalues of M21 K Eigenvalues of M21=2KM21=2
Mode-shape vectors ðci Þ Nontrivial solutions
of ½v2i
M 2 Kc ¼ 0
Eigenvectors of M21 K Determine eigenvectors fi
of M21=2KM21=2 : Then ci ¼ M21=2fi
3-24 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Example 3.6
We will use the 2-DoF vibration problem given in Figure 3.4 (Example 3.3) to demonstrate the fact that
all three approaches summarized in Table 3.4 will lead to the same results.
Consider the special case of a ¼ 0:5 and b ¼ 0:5: Then we have
M ¼
m 0
0
m
2
2
4
3
5 and K ¼
3
2
k 2
k
2
2
k
2
k
2
2
6664
3
7775
Approach 1
Using the standard approach, we obtain the modal results given in Table 3.3. Specifically, we get the
natural frequencies (normalized with respect to v0 ¼
ffiffiffiffiffi
k=m p )
v1
v0 ¼
1ffiffi
2 p and
v2
v0 ¼
ffiffi
2 p
and the mode shapes
c2
c1
1¼ 2 and
c2
c1
2¼ 21
Let us now obtain these results using the other two approaches of modal analysis.
Approach 2
M21 ¼
1
m 0
0
2
m
2
64
3
75
;
M21K ¼
1
m 0
0
2
m
2
64
3
75
3
2
k 2
k
2
2
k
2
k
2
2
6664
3
7775
¼
3
2
k
m
2
1
2
k
m
2
k
m
k
m
2
6664
3
7775
¼ v20
3
2
2
1
2
21 1
2
64
3
75
Note that this is not a symmetric matrix. We solve the eigenvalue problem of
3
2
2
1
2
21 1
2
64
3
75
Eigenvalues l are given by
det
l 2
3
2
1
2
1 l 2 1
2
64
3
75
¼ 0
or
l 2
3
2
ðl 2 1Þ 2
1
2 ¼ 0
or
l2 2
5
2
l þ 1 ¼ 0
Modal Analysis 3-25
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
the roots of which are
l1; l2 ¼
1
2
; 2
It follows that v1=v0 ¼ 1=
ffiffi
2 p and v2=v0 ¼
ffiffi
2 p as before.
The eigenvector corresponding to l1 (mode 1) is given by
1
2
2
3
2
1
2
1
1
2
2 1
2
664
3
775
c1
c2
" #
1¼
0
0
" #
The solution is ðc2=c1Þ1 ¼ 2 as before.
The eigenvector corresponding to l2 (mode 2) is given by
2 2
3
2
1
2
1 22 1
2
64
3
75
c1
c2
" #
2¼
0
0
" #
The solution is ðc2=c1Þ2 ¼ 21 as before.
Approach 3
Since M is diagonal, it is easy to obtain M1=2: We simply take the square root of the diagonal elements;
thus,
M1=2 ¼
ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
m
2
r
2
64
3
75
Its inverse is given by inverting the diagonal elements; thus
M21=2 ¼
1ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
2
m
r
2
6664
3
7775
Now,
M21=2KM21=2 ¼
1ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
2
m
r
2
6664
3
7775
3
2
k 2
k
2
2
k
2
k
2
2
6664
3
7775
1ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
2
m
r
2
6664
3
7775
¼
3
2
k
m
2
1ffiffi
2 p
k
m
2
1ffiffi
2 p
k
m
k
m
2
66664
3
77775
¼ v20
3
2
2
1ffiffi
2 p
2
1ffiffi
2 p 1
2
6664
3
7775
Note that, as expected, this is a symmetric matrix. We solve for eigenvalues and eigenvectors of
3
2
2
1ffiffi
2 p
2
1ffiffi
2 p 1
2
6664
3
7775
3-26 Vibration and Shock Handbook
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Eigenvalues are given by
det
l 2
3
2
1ffiffi
2 p
1ffiffi
2 p l 2 1
2
6664
3
7775
¼ 0
or
l 2
3
2
ðl 2 1Þ 2
1
2 ¼ 0
or
l2 2
5
2
l þ 1 ¼ 0
which is identical to the characteristic equation obtained in the first two approaches. It follows that the
same two natural frequencies are obtained by this method. The eigenvector f1 for mode 1 is given by
1
2
2
3
2
1ffiffi
2 p
1ffiffi
2 p
1
2
2 1
2
6664
3
7775
f1
f2
" #
1¼
0
0
" #
which gives ðf2=f1Þ1 ¼
h ffiffi
2 p i
:
Accordingly, we may use
f1
f2
" #
1¼
1
ffiffi
2 p
" #
The eigenvector f2 for mode 2 is given by
2 2
3
2
1ffiffi
2 p
1ffiffi
2 p 2 2 1
2
6664
3
7775
f1
f2
" #
2¼
0
0
" #
which gives ðf2=f1Þ2 ¼ 21=
ffiffi
2 p .
Accordingly, we use
f1
f2
" #
2¼
1
2
1ffiffi
2 p
2
64
3
75
Now, we transform these eigenvectors back to the original coordinate system using Equation 3.39.
We get
c1
c2
" #
1¼
1ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
2
m
r
2
6664
3
7775
1
ffiffi
2 p
" #
¼
1ffiffiffi
pm
2ffiffiffi
pm
2
6664
3
7775
which gives ðc2=c1Þ1 ¼ 2 as before.
Modal Analysis 3-27
© 2005 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
Also,
c1
c2
" #
2¼
1ffiffiffi
pm 0
0
ffiffiffiffi
2
m
r
2
6664
3
7775
1
2
1ffiffi
2 p
2
64
3
75
¼
1ffiffiffi
pm
2
1ffiffiffi
pm
2
6664
3
7775
which gives
c2
c1
2¼ 21 as before:
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Пчеловодство
- Mathematics and art
- Fields and galois theory
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода