CHAPTER XII. GAUGE NATURAL BUNDLES AND OPERATORS

Back

In chapters IV and V we have explained that the natural bundles coincide

with the associated _ber bundles to higher order frame bundles on manifolds.

However, in both di_erential geometry and mathematical physics one can meet

_ber bundles associated to an `abstract' principal bundle with an arbitrary structure

group G. If we modify the idea of bundle functor to such a situation, we

obtain the concept of gauge natural bundle. This is a functor on principal _ber

bundles with structure group G and their local isomorphisms with values in _ber

bundles, but with _bration over the original base manifold. The most important

examples of gauge natural bundles and of natural operators between them are

related with principal connections. In this chapter we _rst develop a description

of all gauge natural bundles analogous to that in chapter V. In particular, we

prove that the regularity condition is a consequence of functoriality and locality

and that any gauge natural bundle is of _nite order. We also present sharp

estimates of the order depending on the dimensions of the standard _bers. So

the r-th order gauge natural bundles coincide with the _ber bundles associated

to r-th principal prolongations of principal G-bundles (see 15.3), which are in

bijection with the actions of the group Wrm

G on manifolds.

Then we discuss a few concrete problems on _nding gauge natural operators.

The geometrical results of section 52 are based on a generalization of the

Utiyama theorem on gauge natural Lagrangians. First we determine all gauge

natural operators of the curvature type. In contradistinction to the essential

uniqueness of the curvature operator on general connections, this result depends

on the structure group in a simple way. Then we study the di_erential forms

of Chern-Weil type with values in an arbitrary associated vector bundle. We

_nd it interesting that the full list of all gauge natural operators leads to a new

geometric result in this case. Next we determine all _rst order gauge natural

operators transforming principal connections to the tangent bundle. In the last

section we _nd all gauge natural operators transforming a linear connection on

a vector bundle and a classical linear connection on the base manifold into a

classical linear connection on the total space.

51. Gauge natural bundles

We are going to generalize the description of all natural bundles F : Mfm !

FMderived in sections 14 and 22 to the gauge natural case. Since the concepts

and considerations are very similar to some previous ones, we shall proceed in a

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

51. Gauge natural bundles 395

rather brief style.

51.1. Let B: FM ! Mf be the base functor. Fix a Lie group G and recall

the category PBm(G), whose objects are principal G-bundles over m-manifolds

and whose morphisms are the morphisms of principal G-bundles f : P ! _ P with

the base map Bf : BP ! B _ P lying in Mfm.

De_nition. A gauge natural bundle over m-dimensional manifolds is a functor

F : PBm(G) ! FM such that

(a) every PBm(G)-object _ : P ! BP is transformed into a _bered manifold

qP : FP ! BP over BP,

(b) every PBm(G)-morphism f : P ! _ P is transformed into a _bered morphism

Ff : FP ! F _ P over Bf,

(c) for every open subset U _ BP, the inclusion i : _􀀀1(U) ! P is transformed

into the inclusion Fi : q􀀀1

P (U) ! FP.

If we intend to point out the structure group G, we say that F is a G-natural

bundle.

51.2. If two PBm(G)-morphisms f, g : P ! _ P satisfy jr

yf = jr

yg at a point

y 2 Px of the _ber of P over x 2 BP, then the fact that the right translations

of principal bundles are di_eomorphisms implies jr

zf = jr

zg for every z 2 Px. In

this case we write jr

xf = jr

xg.

De_nition. A gauge natural bundle F is said to be of order r, if jr

xf = jr

xg

implies FfjFxP = FgjFxP.

51.3. De_nition. A G-natural bundle F is said to be regular if every smoothly

parameterized family of PBm(G)-morphisms is transformed into a smoothly parameterized

family of _bered maps.

51.4. Remark. By de_nition, a G-natural bundle F : PBm(G) ! FMsatis_es

B _ F = B and the projections qP : FP ! BP form a natural transformation

q : F ! B.

In general, we can consider a category C over _bered manifolds, i.e. C is

endowed with a faithful functor m: C ! FM. If C admits localization of objects

and morphisms with respect to the preimages of open subsets on the bases with

analogous properties to 18.2, we can de_ne the gauge natural bundles on C as

functors F : C ! FMsatisfying B_F = B_m and the locality condition 51.1.(c).

Let us mention the categories of vector bundles as examples. The di_erent way

of localization is the source of a crucial di_erence between the bundle functors

on categories over manifolds and the (general) gauge natural bundles. For any

two _bered maps f, g : Y ! _ Y we write jr

xf = jr

xg, x 2 BY , if jr

yf = jr

yg for

all y 2 Yx. Then we say that f and g have the same _ber r-jet at x. The space

of _ber r-jets between C-objects Y and _ Y is denoted by Jr(Y; _ Y ). For a general

category C over _bered manifolds the _niteness of the order of gauge natural

bundles is expressed with the help of the _ber jets. The description of _nite

order bundle functors as explained in section 18 could be generalized now, but

there appear di_culties connected with the (generally) in_nite dimension of the

corresponding jet groups. Since we will need only the gauge natural bundles

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

396 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

on PBm(G) in the sequel, we will restrict ourselves to this category. Then the

description will be quite analogous to that of classical natural bundles. Some

basic steps towards the description in the general case were done in [Slov_ak, 86]

where the in_nite dimensional constructions are performed with the help of the

smooth spaces in the sense of [Frolicher, 81].

51.5. Examples.

(1) The choice G = feg reproduces the natural bundles on Mfm

(2) The functors Qr : PBm(G) ! FM of r-th order principal connections

mentioned in 17.4 are examples of r-th order regular gauge natural bundles.

(3) The gauge natural bundles Wr : PBm(G) ! PBm(Wrm

G) of r-th principal

prolongation de_ned in 15.3 play the same role as the frame bundles Pr : Mfm !

FM did in the description of natural bundles.

(4) For every manifold S with a smooth left action ` of Wrm

G, the construction

of associated bundles to the principal bundlesWrP yields a regular gauge natural

bundle L: PBm(G) ! FM. We shall see that all gauge natural bundles are of

this type.

51.6. Proposition. Every r-th order regular gauge natural bundle is a _ber

bundle associated to Wr.

Proof. Analogously to the case of natural bundles, an r-th order regular gauge

natural bundle F is determined by the system of smooth associated maps

FP; _ P : Jr(P; _ P) _BP FP ! F _ P

and the restriction of FRm_G;Rm_G to the _ber jets at 0 2 Rm yields an action

of Wrm

G = Jr

0(Rm _ G;Rm _ G)0 on the _ber S = F0(Rm _ G). The same

considerations as in 14.6 complete now the proof. _

51.7. Theorem. Let F : PBm(G) ! Mf be a functor endowed with a natural

transformation q : F ! B such that the locality condition 51.1.(c) holds.

Then S := (qRm_G)􀀀1(0) is a manifold of dimension s _ 0 and for every

P 2 ObPBm(G), the mapping qP : FP ! BP is a locally trivial _ber bundle

with standard _ber S, i.e. F : PBm(G) ! FM. The functor F is a regular

gauge natural bundle of a _nite order r _ 2s + 1. If moreover m > 1, then

(1) r _ maxf

s

m 􀀀 1;

s

m

+ 1g:

All these estimates are sharp.

Briey, every gauge natural bundle on PBm(G) with s-dimensional _bers is

one of the functors de_ned in example 51.5.(4) with r bounded by the estimates

from the theorem depending on m and s but not on G. The proof is based on

the considerations from chapter V and it will require several steps.

51.8. Let us point out that the restriction of any gauge natural bundle F to

trivial principal bundles M _G and to morphisms of the form f _id : M _G !

N _ G can be viewed as a natural bundle Mfm ! FM. Hence the action _ of

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

51. Gauge natural bundles 397

the abelian group of _ber translations tx : Rm_G ! Rm_G, (y; a) 7! (x+y; a),

i.e. _x = Ftx, is a smooth action by 20.3. This implies immediately the assertion

on _ber bundle structure in 51.7, cf. 20.3. Further, analogously to 20.5.(1) we

_nd that the regularity of F follows if we verify the smoothness of the induced

action of the morphisms keeping the _ber over 0 2 Rm on the standard _ber

S = F0(Rm _ G).

51.9. Lemma. Let U _ S be a relatively compact open set and write

QU =

[

'

F'(U) _ S

where the union goes through all ' 2 PBm(G)(Rm _ G;Rm _ G) with '0(0) =

(0). Then there is r 2 N such that for all z 2 QU and all PBm(G)-morphisms

', : Rm _ G ! Rm _ G, '0(0) = 0(0) = 0, the condition jr

0' = jr

0 implies

F'(z) = F (z).

Proof. Every morphism ': Rm_G ! Rm_G is identi_ed with the couple '0 2

C1(Rm;Rm), _' 2 C1(Rm;G). So F induces an operator ~ F : C1(Rm;Rm _

G) ! C1(F(Rm _ G); F(Rm _ G)) which is qRm_G-local and the map qRm_G

is locally non-constant. Consider the constant map ^e: Rm ! G, x 7! e, and the

map idRm _^e: Rm ! Rm_G corresponding to idRm_G. By corollary 19.8, there

is r 2 N such that jr

0f = jr

0(idRm _ ^e) implies ~ Ff(z) = z for all z 2 U. Hence if

jr

0' = jr

0idRm_G, then F'(z) = z for all z 2 U and the easy rest of the proof is

quite analogous to 20.4. _

51.10. Proposition. Every gauge natural bundle is regular.

Proof. The whole proof of 20.5 goes through for gauge natural bundles if we

choose local coordinates near to the unit in G and replace the elements j1

0 fn 2

G1

m by the couples (j1

0 fn; j1

0 _'n) 2 G1

m o T1

m G and idRm by idRm _ ^e. Let us

remark that also _x gets the new meaning of F(tx). _

51.11. Since every natural bundle F : Mf ! FM can be viewed as the gauge

natural bundle _ F = F _ B: PBm(G) ! FM, the estimates from theorem 51.7

must be sharp if they are correct, see 22.1. Further, the considerations from 22.1

applied to our situation show that we complete the proof of 51.7 if we deduce

that every smooth action of Wrm

G on a smooth manifold S factorizes to an action

of Wkm

G, k _ r, with k satisfying the estimates from 51.7.

So let us consider a continuous action _: Wrm

G ! Di_(S) and write H for its

kernel. Hence H is a closed normal Lie subgroup and the kernel H0 _ Gr

m of

the restriction _0 = _jGr

m always contains the normal Lie subgroup Brk

_ Gr

m

with k = 2dimS + 1 if m = 1 and k = maxfdimS

m􀀀1 ; dimS

m + 1g if m > 1. Let us

denote Kr

k the kernel of the jet projection Wrm

G ! Wkm

G.

Lemma. For every Lie group G and all r, k 2 N, r > k _ 1, the normal closed

Lie subgroup in Wrm

G generated by Brk

o feg equals to Kr

k.

Proof. The Lie group Wrm

G can be viewed as the space of _ber jets Jr

0(Rm _

G;Rm _G)0 and so its Lie algebra wr

mg coincides with the space of _ber jets at

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

398 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

0 2 Rm of (projectable) right invariant vector _elds with projections vanishing

at the origin. If we repeat the consideration from the proof of 13.2 with jets

replaced by _ber jets, we get the formula for Lie bracket in wr

mg, [jr

0X; jr

0Y ] =

􀀀jr

0[X; Y ]. Since every polynomial vector _eld in wr

mg decomposes into a sum

of X1 2 gr

m and a vertical vector _eld X2 from the Lie algebra Trm

g of Trm

G, we

get immediately the action of gr

m on Trm

g, [jr

0X1 + 0; 0 + jr

0X2] = 􀀀jr

0

LX1X2.

Now let us _x a base ei of g and elements Yi 2 Trm

g, Yi = jr

0x1ei. Taking any

functions fi on Rm with jk

0 fi = 0, the r-jets of the _elds Xi = fi@=@x1 lie in the

kernel br

k

_ gr

m and we get

X

i

[jr

0Xi; jr

0Yi] = 􀀀jr

0fiei 2 Trm

g:

Hence [br

k; Trm

g] contains the whole Lie algebra of the kernel Kr

k and so the latter

algebra must coincide with the ideal in wr

mg generated by br

k o f0g. Since the

kernel Kr

1 is connected this completes the proof. _

51.12. Corollary. Let G be a Lie group and S be a manifold with a continuous

left action of Wrm

G, dimS = s _ 0. Then the action factorizes to an action of

Wkm

G with k _ 2s + 1. If m > 1, then k _ maxf s

m􀀀1 ; s

m + 1g. These estimates

are sharp.

The corollary concludes the proof of theorem 51.7.

51.13. Given two G-natural bundles F, E: PBm(G) ! FM, every natural

transformation T : F ! E is formed be a system of base preserving FMmorphisms,

cf. 14.11 and 51.8. In the same way as in 14.12 one deduces

Proposition. Natural transformations F ! E between two r-th order Gnatural

bundles over m-dimensional manifolds are in a canonical bijection with

the Wrm

G-equivariant maps F0 ! E0 between the standard _bers F0 = F0(Rm_

G), E0 = E0(Rm _ G).

51.14. De_nition. Let F and E be two G-natural bundles over m-dimensional

manifolds. A gauge natural operator D: F E is a system of regular operators

DP : C1FP ! C1EP for all PBm(G)-objects _ : P ! BP such that

(a) D_ P (Ff _ s _ Bf􀀀1) = Ff _ DP s _ Bf􀀀1 for every s 2 C1FP and every

PBm(G)-isomorphism f : P ! _ P,

(b) D_􀀀1(U)(sjU) = (DP s)jU for every s 2 C1FP and every open subset

U _ BP.

51.15. For every k 2 N and every gauge natural bundle F of order r its composition

Jk _ F with the k-th jet prolongation de_nes a gauge natural bundle

functor of order k + r, cf. 14.16. In the same way as in 14.17 one deduces

Proposition. The k-th order gauge natural operators F E are in a canonical

bijection with the natural transformations JkF ! E.

In particular, this proposition implies that the k-th order G-natural operators

F E are in a canonical bijection with the Wsm

G-equivariant maps Jk

0 F ! E0,

where s is the maximum of the orders of JkF and E and Jk

0 F = Jk

0 F(Rm _G).

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

52. The Utiyama theorem 399

51.16. Consider the G-natural connection bundle Q and an arbitrary G-natural

bundle E.

Proposition. Every gauge natural operator A: Q E has _nite order.

Proof. By 51.8, every G-natural bundle F determines a classical natural bundle

NF by NF(M) = F(M_G), NF(f) = F(f _idG). Given a G-natural operator

D: F E, we denote by ND its restriction to NF, i.e. NDM = DM_G. Clearly,

ND is a classical natural operator NF ! NE.

Since our operator A is determined locally, we may restrict ourselves to the

product bundle M _ G. Then we have a classical natural operator NA. In this

situation the standard _ber g  Rm_ of Q coincides with the direct product of

dimG copies of Rm_. Hence we can apply proposition 23.5. _

52. The Utiyama theorem

52.1. The connection bundle. First we write the equations of a connection

􀀀 on Rm _ G in a suitable form. Let ep be a basis of g and let !p be the

corresponding (left) Maurer-Cartan forms given by

P

p !p(Xg)ep = T(_g􀀀1 )(X).

Let

(1) (!p)e = 􀀀p

i (x)dxi

be the equations of 􀀀(x; e), x 2 Rm, e = the unit of G. Since 􀀀 is right-invariant,

its equations on the whole space Rm _ G are

(2) !p = 􀀀p

i (x)dxi:

The connection bundle QP = J1P=G is a _rst order gauge natural bundle

with standard _ber gRm_. Having a PBm(G)-isomorphism _ of Rm _G into

itself

(3) _x = f(x); _y = '(x) _ y; f(0) = 0

with ': Rm ! G, its 1-jet j10

_ 2 W1m

G is characterized by

(4) a = '(0) 2 G; (ap

i ) = j1

0 (a􀀀1 _ '(x)) 2 g  Rm_; (ai

j) = j1

0f 2 G1

m:

Let Apq

(a) be the coordinate expression of the adjoint representation of G. In

15.6 we deduced the following equations of the action of W1m

G on g  Rm_

(5) _

􀀀

p

i = Apq

(a)(􀀀q

j + aq

j )~aj

i :

The _rst jet prolongation J1QP of the connection bundle is a second order

gauge natural bundle, so that its standard _ber S1 = J1

0Q(Rm _ G), with the

coordinates 􀀀p

i , 􀀀p

ij = @􀀀p

i =@xj , is a W2m

G-space. The second order partial

derivatives ap

ij of the map a􀀀1 _ '(x) together with ai

jk = @2

jkfi(0) are the additional

coordinates on W2m

G. Using 15.5, we deduce from (5) that the action of

W2m

G on S1 has the form (5) and

_􀀀

p

ij = Apq

(a)􀀀q

kl~aki

~al

j + Apq

(a)aq

kl~aki

~al

(6) j+

+ Dp

qr(a)􀀀q

karl

~aki

~al

j + Ep

qr(a)aq

karl

~aki

~al

j + Apq

(a)(􀀀q

k + aq

k)~ak

ij

where the D's and E's are some functions on G, which we shall not need.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

400 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

52.2. The curvature. To deduce the coordinate expression of the curvature

tensor, we shall use the structure equations of 􀀀. By 52.1.(1), the components

'p of the connection form of 􀀀 are

(1) 'p = !p 􀀀 􀀀p

i (x)dxi:

The structure equations of 􀀀 reads

(2) d'p = cpq

r'q ^ 'r + Rp

ijdxi ^ dxj

where cpq

r are the structure constants of G and Rp

ij is the curvature tensor. Since

!p are the Maurer-Cartan forms of G, we have d!p = cpq

r!q ^ !r. Hence the

exterior di_erentiation of (1) yields

(3) d'p = cpq

r('q + 􀀀q

i dxi) ^ ('r + 􀀀rj

dxj) + 􀀀p

ij(x)dxi ^ dxj :

Comparing (2) with (3), we obtain

(4) Rp

ij = 􀀀p

[ij] + cpq

r􀀀q

i 􀀀rj

:

52.3. Generalization of the Utiyama theorem. The curvature of a connection

􀀀 on P can be considered as a section CP 􀀀: BP ! LP  _2T_BP, where

LP = P[g; Ad] is the so-called adjoint bundle of P, see 17.6. Using the language

of the theory of gauge natural bundles, D. J. Eck reformulated a classical result

by Utiyama in the following form: All _rst order gauge natural Lagrangians on

the connection bundle are of the form A _ C, where A is a zero order gauge

natural Lagrangian on the curvature bundle and C is the curvature operator,

[Eck, 81]. By 49.1, a _rst order Lagrangian on a connection bundle QP is a

morphism J1QP ! _mT_BP, so that the Utiyama theorem deals with _rst

order gauge natural operators Q _mT_B. We are going to generalize this

result. Since the proof will be based on the orbit reduction, we shall directly

discuss the standard _bers in question.

Denote by  : S1 ! g  _2Rm_ the formal curvature map 52.2.(4). One

sees easily that  is a surjective submersion. The semi-direct decomposition

W2m

G = G2

m o T2m

G together with the target jet projection T2m

G ! G de_nes a

group homomorphism p: W2m

G ! G2

m

_G. Let Z be a G2

m

_G-space, which can

be considered as a W2m

G-space by means of p. The standard _ber g_2Rm_ of

the curvature bundle is a G1

m

_ G-space, which can be interpreted as G2

m

_ Gspace

by means of the jet homomorphism _2

1 : G2

m

! G1

m.

Proposition. For every W2m

G-map f : S1 ! Z there exists a unique G2

m

_ Gmap

g : g  _2Rm_ ! Z satisfying f = g _ .

Proof. On the kernel K of p: W2m

G ! G2

m

_ G we have the coordinates ap

i ,

ap

ij = ap

ji introduced in 52.1. Let us replace the coordinates 􀀀p

ij on S1 by

(1) Rp

ij = 􀀀p

[ij] + cpq

r􀀀q

i 􀀀rj

; Sp

ij = 􀀀p

(ij);

while 􀀀p

i remain unchanged. Hence the coordinate form of  is (􀀀p

i ;Rp

ij ; Sp

ij) 7!

(Rp

ij ). From 52.1.(5) and 52.1.(6) we can evaluate ap

i and ap

ij in such a way that

_􀀀

p

i = 0 and _ Sp

ij = 0. This implies that each _ber of  is a K-orbit. Then we

apply 28.1. _

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

52. The Utiyama theorem 401

52.4. To interpret the proposition 52.3 in terms of operators, it is useful to

introduce a more subtle notion of principal prolongation Ws;rP of order (s; r),

s _ r, of a principal _ber bundle P(M;G). Formally we can construct the _ber

product over M

(1) Ws;rP = PsM _M JrP

and the semi-direct product of Lie groups

(2) Ws;r

m G = Gs

m o Trm

G

with respect to the right action (A;B) 7! B _ _s

r(A) of Gs

m on Trm

G. The right

action of Ws;r

m G on Ws;rP is given by a formula analogous to 15.4

(u; v)(A;B) = (u _ A; v:(B _ _s

r(A􀀀1 _ u􀀀1)));

u 2 PsM, v 2 JrP, A 2 Gs

m, B 2 Trm

G. In the case r = 0 we have a

direct product of Lie groups Ws;0

m G = Gs

m

_ G and the usual _bered product

Ws;0P = PsM _M P of principal _ber bundles.

To clarify the geometric substance of the previous construction, we have to use

the concept of (r; s; q)-jet of a _bered manifold morphism introduced in 12.19.

Then Ws;rP can be de_ned as the space of all (r; r; s)-jets at (0; e) of the local

principal bundle isomorphisms Rm _ G ! P and the group Ws;r

m G is the _ber

of Ws;r(Rm _ G) over 0 2 Rm endowed with the jet composition. The proof is

left to the reader as an easy exercise. Furthermore, in the same way as in 51.2

we deduce that if two PBm(G)-morphisms f; g : P ! _ P satisfy jr;r;s

y f = jr;r;s

y g

at a point y 2 Px, x 2 BP, then this equality holds at every point of the _ber

Px. In this case we write jr;r;s

x f = jr;r;s

x g.

Now we can say that natural bundle F is of order (s; r), s _ r, if jr;r;s

x f =

jr;r;s

x g implies FfjFxP = FgjFxP. Using the proposition 51.10 we deduce quite

similarly to 51.6 that every gauge natural bundle of order (s,r) is a _ber bundle

associated to Ws;r.

Then the proposition 52.3 is equivalent to the following assertion.

General Utiyama theorem. Let F be a gauge natural bundle of order (2; 0).

Then for every _rst order gauge natural operator A: Q F there exists a

unique natural transformation A_: L_2T_B ! F satisfying A = A_ _ C, where

C : Q L  _2T_B is the curvature operator.

In all concrete problems in this chapter the result will be applied to gauge

natural bundles of order (1,0). By de_nition, every such a bundle has the order

(2,0) as well.

52.5. Curvature-like operators. The curvature operator C : Q L_2T_B

is a gauge natural operator because of the geometric de_nition of the curvature.

We are going to determine all gauge natural operators Q L  2T_B.

(We shall see that the values of all of them lie in L  _2T_B. But this is an

interesting geometric result that the antisymmetry of such operators is a consequence

of their gauge naturality.) Let Z _ L(g; g) be the subspace of all

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

402 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

linear maps commuting with the adjoint action of G. Since every z 2 Z is an

equivariant linear map between the standard _bers, it induces a vector bundle

morphism _zP : LP ! LP. Hence we can construct a modi_ed curvature operator

C(z)P : (_zP  _2T_idBP ) _ CP .

Proposition. All gauge natural operators Q L  2T_B are the modi_ed

curvature operators C(z) for all z 2 Z.

Proof. By 51.16, every gauge natural operator A on the connection bundle has

_nite order. The r-th order gauge natural operators correspond to the Wr+1

m Gequivariant

maps Jr

0Q ! g  2Rm_. Let 􀀀p

i_ be the induced coordinates on

Jr

0Q, where _ is a multi index of range m with j_j _ r. On g  2Rm_ we have

the canonical coordinates Rp

ij and the action

(1) _Rp

ij = Apq

(a)Rq

kl~aki

~al

j :

Hence the coordinate components of the map associated to A are some functions

fp

ij(􀀀q

k_). If we consider the canonical inclusion of G1

m into Wr+1

m G, then

analogously to 14.20 the transformation laws of all quantities 􀀀p

i_ are tensorial.

The equivariance with respect to the homotheties in G1

m gives a homogeneity

condition

(2) c2fp

ij(􀀀q

k_) = fp

ij(c1+j_j􀀀q

k_) 0 6= c 2 R:

By the homogeneous function theorem, fp

ij is independent of 􀀀p

i_ with j_j _ 2.

Hence A is a _rst order operator and we can apply the general Utiyama theorem.

The associated map

(3) g : g  _2Rm_ ! g  2Rm_

of the induced natural transformation L  _2T_B ! L  2T_B is of the form

gp

ij(Rq

kl). Using the homotheties in G1

m we _nd that g is linear. If we _x one

coordinate in g on the right-hand side of the arrow (3), we obtain a linear G1

m-

map _n_2Rm_ ! 2Rm_. By 24.8.(5), this map is a linear combination of the

individual inclusions _2Rm_ ,! 2Rm_, i.e.

(4) gp

ij = zp

qRq

ij :

Using the equivariance with respect to the canonical inclusion of G into W2m

G,

we _nd that the linear map (zp

q ) : g ! g commutes with the adjoint action. _

52.6. Remark. In the case that the structure group is the general linear group

GL(n) of an arbitrary dimension n, the invariant tensor theorem implies directly

that the Ad-invariant linear maps gl(n) ! gl(n) are generated by the identity

and the map X 7! (traceX)id. Then the proposition 52.5 gives a two-parameter

family of all GL(n)-natural operators Q L  2T_B, which the _rst author

deduced by direct evaluation in [Kol_a_r, 87b]. In general it is remarkable that

the study of the case of the special structure group GL(n), to which we can

apply the generalized invariant tensor theorem, plays a useful heuristic role in

the theory of gauge natural operators.

Further we remark that all gauge natural operators Q _ Q L  2T_B

transforming pairs of connections on an arbitrary principal _ber bundle P into

sections of LP  2T_BP are determined in [Kurek, to appear a].

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

52. The Utiyama theorem 403

52.7. Generalized Chern-Weil forms. We recall that for every vector bundle

E ! M, a section of E  _rT_M is called an E-valued r-form, see 7.11.

For E = M _ R we obtain the usual exterior forms on M. Consider a linear

action _ of a Lie group G on a vector space V and denote by ~ V the G-natural

bundle over m-manifolds determined by this action of G = W0m

G. We are going

to construct some gauge natural operators transforming every connection 􀀀 on a

principal bundle P(M;G) into a ~ V (P)-valued exterior form. In the special case

of the identity action of G on R, i.e. _(g) = idR for all g 2 G, we obtain the

classical Chern-Weil forms of 􀀀, [Kobayashi,Nomizu, 69].

Let h: Srg ! V be a linear G-map. We have Sr(g  _2Rm_) = Srg

Sr_2Rm_, so that we can de_ne _h : g  _2Rm_ ! V  _2rRm_ by

(1) _h(A) = (h  Alt)(A  _ _ _  A); A 2 g  _2Rm_;

where Alt: Sr_2Rm_ ! _2rRm_ is the tensor alternation. Since g  _2Rm_

or V  _2rRm_ is the standard _ber of the curvature bundle or of ~ V (P)

_2rT_M, respectively, _h induces a bundle morphism _hP : L(P)  _2T_M !

~ V (P)  _2rT_M. For every connection 􀀀: M ! QP, we _rst construct its

curvature CP 􀀀 and then a ~ V (P)-valued 2r-form

(2) ~hP (􀀀) =_hP (CP 􀀀):

Such forms will be called generalized Chern-Weil forms.

Let I(g; V ) denote the space of all polynomial G-maps of g into V . Every

H 2 I(g; V ) is determined by a _nite sequence of linear G-maps hri : Srig ! V ,

i = 1; : : : ; n. Then

~H

P (􀀀) =~hr1

P (􀀀) + _ _ _ +~hrn

P (􀀀)

is a section of ~ V (P)  _T_M for every connection 􀀀 on P. By de_nition, ~H is

a gauge natural operator Q ~ V  _T_B.

52.8. Theorem. All G-natural operators Q ~ V  _T_B are of the form ~H

for all H 2 I(g; V ).

Proof. Consider some linear coordinates yp on g and za on V and the induced

coordinates yp

ij on g  _2Rm_ and za

i1:::is on V  _sRm_.

By 51.16 every G-natural operator A: Q ~ V  _sT_B has a _nite order k.

Hence its associated map f : Jk

0Q ! V  _sRm_ is of the form

za

i1:::is = fa

i1:::is(􀀀p

i_); 0 _ j_j _ k:

The homotheties in G1

m give a homogeneity condition

ksfa

i1:::is(􀀀p

i_) = fa

i1:::is (k1+j_j􀀀p

i_):

This implies that f is a polynomial map in 􀀀p

i_. Fix a, p1, j_1j, : : : , pr, j_rj with

j_1j _ 2 and consider the subpolynomial of the a-th component of f which is

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

404 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

formed by the linear combinations of 􀀀p1

i1_1 : : : 􀀀pr

ir_r

. It represents a GL(m)-map

Rm_  Sj_1jRm_ _ : : : _ Rm_  Sj_rjRm_ ! _pRm_. Analogously to 24.8 we

deduce that this is the zero map because of the symmetric component Sj_1jRm_.

Hence A is a _rst order operator.

Applying the general Utiyama theorem, we obtain f = g _ , where g is a

G1

m

_ G-map g  _2Rm_ ! V  _sRm_. The coordinate form of g is

za

i1:::is = ga

i1:::is (yp

ij):

Using the homotheties in G1

m we _nd that s = 2r and g is a polynomial of degree

r in yp

ij . Its total polarization is a linear map Sr(g  _2Rm_) ! V  _2rRm_.

If we _x one coordinate in V and any r-tuple of coordinates in g, we obtain

an underlying problem of _nding all linear G1

m-maps r_2Rm_ ! _2rRm_. By

24.8.(5) each this map is a constant multiple of yp1

[i1i2

: : : ypr

i2r􀀀1i2r]. Hence g is of

the form

cap

1:::pryp1

[i1i2

: : : ypr

i2r􀀀1i2r]:

The equivariance with respect to the canonical inclusion of G into W2m

G implies

that (cap

1:::pr ) : Srg ! V is a G-map. _

52.9. Consider the special case of the identity action of G on R. Then every

linear G-map Srg ! R is identi_ed with a G-invariant element of Srg_ and

the (M _ R)-valued forms are the classical di_erential forms on M. Hence

52.7.(2) gives the classical Chern-Weil forms of a connection. In this case the

theorem 52.8 reads that all gauge natural di_erential forms on connections are

the classical Chern-Weil forms. All of them are of even degree. The exterior

di_erential of a Chern-Weil form is a gauge natural form of odd degree. By the

theorem 52.8 it must be a zero form. This gives an interesting application of

gauge naturality for proving the following classical result.

Corollary. All classical Chern-Weil forms are closed.

52.10. In general, if one has a vector bundle E ! M, an E-valued r-form

!: _rTM ! E and a linear connection _ on E, one introduces the covariant

exterior derivative d_!: _r+1TM ! E, see 11.14. Consider the situation from

52.7. For every H 2 I(g; V ) and every connection 􀀀 on P we have constructed

a ~ V (P)-valued form ~HP (􀀀), which is of even degree. According to 11.11, 􀀀

induces a linear connection 􀀀V on ~ V (P). Then d􀀀V

~H

P (􀀀) is a gauge natural

~ V (P)-valued form of odd degree. By the theorem 52.8 it is a zero form. Thus,

we have proved the following interesting geometric result.

Proposition. For every H 2 I(g; V ) and every connection 􀀀 on P, it holds

d􀀀V

~H

P (􀀀) = 0.

52.11. Remark. We remark that another generalization of Chern-Weil forms

is studied in [Lecomte, 85].

52.12. Gauge natural approach to the Bianchi identity. It is remarkable

that the Bianchi identity for a principal connection 􀀀: BP ! QP can be deduced

in a similar way. Using the notation from 52.5, we _rst prove an auxiliary result.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

53. Base-extending gauge natural operators 405

Lemma. The only gauge natural operator Q L_3T_B is the zero operator.

Proof. By 51.16, every such operator A has _nite order. Let

fp

ijk(􀀀q

l_); 0 _ j_j _ r

be its associated map. The homotheties in G1

m yield a homogeneity condition

(1) c3fp

ijk(􀀀q

l_) = fp

ijk(c1+j_j􀀀q

l_); c 2 R n f0g:

Hence f is polynomial in 􀀀p

i , 􀀀p

ij and 􀀀p

ijk of degrees d0, d1 and d2 satisfying

3 = d0 + 2d1 + 3d2:

This implies f is linear in 􀀀p

ijk. But 􀀀p

ijk represent a linear GL(m)-map Rm_

S2Rm_ ! _3Rm_ for each p = 1; : : : ; n. By 24.8 the only possibility is the

zero map. Hence A is a _rst order operator. By the general Utiyama theorem,

f factorizes through a map g : g  _2Rm_ ! g  _3Rm_. The equivariance

of g with respect to the homotheties in G1

m yields a homogeneity condition

c3g(y) = g(c2y), y 2 g  _2Rm_. Since there is no integer satisfying 3 = 2d, g is

the zero map. _

The curvature of 􀀀 is a section CP 􀀀: BP ! LP  _2T_BP. According to

the general theory, 􀀀 induces a linear connection ~

􀀀

on the adjoint bundle LP.

Hence we can construct the covariant exterior di_erential

(2) r~􀀀

CP 􀀀: BP ! LP  _3T_BP:

By the geometric character of this construction, (2) determines a gauge natural

operator. Then our lemma implies

(3) r~􀀀

CP (􀀀) = 0:

By 11.15, this is the Bianchi identity for 􀀀.

53. Base extending gauge natural operators

53.1. Analogously to 18.17, we now formulate the concept of gauge natural

operators in more general situation. Let F, E and H be three G-natural bundles

over m-manifolds.

De_nition. A gauge natural operator D: F (E;H) is a system of regular

operators DP : C1FP ! C1

BP (EP;HP) for every PBm(G)-object P satisfying

D_ P (Ff _ s _ Bf􀀀1) = Hf _ DP (s) _ Ef􀀀1 for every s 2 C1FP and every

PBm(G)-isomorphism f : P ! _ P, as well as a localization condition analogous

to 51.14.(b).

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

406 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

53.2. Quite similarly to 18.19, one deduces

Proposition. k-th order gauge natural operators F (E;H) are in a canonical

bijection with the natural transformations JrF _ E ! H.

If we have a natural transformation q : H ! E such that every qP : HP ! EP

is a surjective submersion and we require every DP (s) to be a section of qP , we

write D: F (H ! E). Then we _nd in the same way as in 51.15 that the

G-natural operators F (H ! E) are in bijection with the Wsm

-equivariant

maps f : Jk

0 F _ E0 ! H0, satisfying q0 _ f = pr2, where q0 : H0 ! E0 is the

restriction of qRm_G and s is the maximum of the orders in question.

53.3. Gauge natural operators Q (QT ! TB). In 46.3 we deduced that

every connection 􀀀 on principal bundle P ! M with structure group G induces

a connection T 􀀀 on the principal bundle TP ! TM with structure group TG.

Hence T is a (_rst-order) G-natural operator Q (QT ! TB). Now we are

going to determine all _rst-order G-natural operators Q (QT ! TB). Since

the di_erence of two connections on TP ! TBP is a section of L(TP)T_TBP,

it su_ces to determine all _rst-order G-natural operators Q (LT  T_TB !

TB). The _ber of the total projection L(T(Rm _ G))  T_TRm ! TRm ! Rm

over 0 2 Rm is the product of Rm with tg  T_

0 TRm, 0 2 TRm = R2m. By 53.2

our operators are in bijection with the W2m

G-equivariant maps J1

0Q(Rm _G)_

Rm ! Rm _ tg  T_

0 TRm over the identity of Rm.

We know from 10.17 that TG coincides with the semidirect product G o g

with the following multiplication

(1) (g1;X1)(g2;X2) = (g1g2; Ad(g􀀀1

2 )(X1) + X2)

where Ad means the adjoint action of G. This identi_es the Lie algebra tg of TG

with g _ g and a direct calculation yields the following formula for the adjoint

action AdTG of TG

(2) AdTG(g;X)(Y; V ) = (Ad(g)(Y ); Ad(g)([X; Y ] + V )):

Hence the subspace 0_g _ tg is AdTG-invariant, so that it de_nes a subbundle

K(TP) _ L(TP). The injection V 7! (0; V ) induces a map IP : LP ! K(TP).

Every modi_ed curvature C(z)P (􀀀) of a connection 􀀀 on P, see 52.5, can be

interpreted as a linear morphism _2TBP ! LP. Then we can de_ne a linear

map _(C(z)P (􀀀)): TTBP ! L(TP) by

(3) _(C(z)P (􀀀))(A) = IP (C(z)P (􀀀)(_1A ^ _2A)); A 2 TTBP

where _1 : TTBP ! TBP is the bundle projection and _2 : TTBP ! TBP is

the tangent map of the bundle projection TBP ! BP. This determines one

series _(C(z)), z 2 Z, of G-natural operators Q (LT  T_TB ! TB).

Moreover, if we consider a modi_ed curvature C(z)P (􀀀) as a map C(z) : P _

_2TBP ! g, we can construct its vertical prolongation with respect to the _rst

factor

V1C(z)P (􀀀): V P _ _2TBP ! Tg = tg:

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

53. Base-extending gauge natural operators 407

Then we add the vertical projection _ : TP ! V P of the connection 􀀀 and we

use the projections _1and _2 from (3). This yields a map

(4) _ (C(z)P (􀀀)) : TP _ TTBP ! tg

_ (C(z)P (􀀀))(U;A) = V1C(z)P (􀀀)(_U; _1A ^ _2A); U 2 TP; A 2 TTBP:

The latter map can be interpreted as a section of L(TP)T_TBP, which gives

another series _ (C(z)), z 2 Z, of G-natural operators Q (LT T_TB ! TB).

Proposition. All _rst-order gauge natural operators Q (QT ! TB) form

the following 2dimZ-parameter family

(5) T + _(C(z)) + _ (C(_z)); z; _z 2 Z:

The proof will occupy the rest of this section.

53.4. Let 􀀀 be a connection on Rm _ G with equations

(1) !p = 􀀀p

i (x)dxi:

Let ("p) be the second component of the Maurer-Cartan form of TG (the _rst

one is (!p)) and let Xi be the induced coordinates on T0Rm. Applying the

description of the Maurer-Cartan form of TG from 37.16 to (1), we _nd the

equation of T 􀀀 is of the form (1) and

(2) "p = @􀀀p

i

@xj Xjdxi + 􀀀p

i dXi:

53.5. Remark _rst that every d

dt

__

0 x(t) 2 T0Rm de_nes a map

(1) T1m

G ! TG; j1

0' 7! d

dt

__

0 (' _ x)(t):

Consider an isomorphism _x = f(x), _y = '(x) _ y of Rm _ G and an element of

V (T(Rm _ G) ! TRm). Clearly, such an element can be generated by a map

(x(t); y(t; u)) : R2 ! Rm _ G, t, u 2 R. This map is transformed into

(2) _x = f(x(t)); _y = '(x(t)) _ y(t; u):

Di_erentiating with respect to t, we _nd

(3) d_y

dt

= T_(d'(x(0))

dt

;

dy(0; u)

dt

)

where _: G _ G ! G is the group composition. This implies that the next

di_erentiation with respect to u yields the adjoint action of TG with respect to

(1). Thus, if (Y p; V p) are the coordinates in tg given by our basis in g, then

we deduce by the latter observation that the action of W2m

G on Rm _ tg is

_X

i = ai

jXj and

(4) _ Y p = Apq

(a)Y q; _ V p = Apq

(a)(cq

rsarj

XjY s + V q):

On the other hand, the action of W2m

G on T0TRm goes through the projection

into G2

m and has the standard form

(5) d_xi = ai

jdxj ; d_X i = ai

jkXjdxk + ai

jdXj :

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

408 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

53.6. Our problem is to _nd all W2m

G-equivariant maps f : Rm _J1

0Q ! Rm _

tg  T_

0 TRm over idRm. On J1

0Q, we replace 􀀀p

ij by Rp

ij and Sp

ij as in 52.3. The

coordinates on tg  T_

0 TRm are given by

Y p = Bp

i dxi + Cp

(1) i dXi

V p = Dp

i dxi + Ep

i (2) dXi:

Hence all components of f are smooth functions of X = (Xi), 􀀀 = (􀀀p

i ), R =

(Rp

ij ), S = (Sp

ij ). Using 53.5.(4){(5), we deduce from (1) the transformation

laws

_ Cp

i = Apq

(a)Cq

j ~aj

i (3)

_B

p

i = Apq

(a)Bq

j ~aj

i

􀀀 Apq

(a)Cq

k~akj

aj

li(4) Xl:

Let us start with the component Cp

i (X; 􀀀; R; S) of f. Using ap

ij and ap

i , we

deduce that C's are independent of 􀀀 and S. Then we have the situation of the

following lemma.

Lemma. All AdG _ GL(m;R)-equivariant maps Rm _ g  _2Rm_ ! g  Rm_

have the form _pq

Rq

ijXj with (_pq

) 2 Z.

Proof. First we determine all GL(m;R)-maps h: Rm _ _n 2 Rm_ ! _nRm_,

h = (hp

i (bq

jk;Xl)). If we consider the contraction hh; vi of h with v = (vi) 2 Rm,

we can apply the tensor evaluation theorem to each component of hh; vi. This

yields

hp

i vi = 'p(bq

ijXiXj ; br

ijviXj ; bs

ijXivj ; bt

ijvivj):

Di_erentiating with respect to vi and setting vi = 0, we obtain

(5) hp

i = 'pq

(br

klXkXl)bq

ijXj + p

q (br

klXkXl)bq

jiXj

with arbitrary smooth functions 'pq

, p

q of n variables. If bp

ij = Rp

ij are antisymmetric,

we have Rp

ijXiXj = 0 and Rp

ijXj = 􀀀Rp

jiXj , so that

(6) hp

i = _pq

Rq

ijXj ; _pq

2 R:

The equivariance with respect to G then yields Apq

(a)_q

r = _pq

Aq

r(a), i.e. (_pq

) 2

Z. _

Thus our lemma implies Cp

i = _pq

Rq

ijXj , (_pq

) 2 Z. For the components Bp

i

of f, the use of ap

i and ap

ij gives that B's are independent of 􀀀 and S. Then the

equivariance with respect to ai

jk yields

(7) Cp

i = 0:

Using our lemma again, we obtain

(8) Bp

i = p

qRq

ijXj ; (p

q ) 2 Z:

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

54. Induced linear connections on the total space of vector and principal bundles 409

53.7. From 53.6.(2) we deduce the transformation laws

_E

p

i = Apq

(a)Eq

j ~aj

i + Apq

(a)cq

rsarj

XjCs

i (1)

_D

p

i = Apq

(a)Dq

j ~aj

i + Apq

(a)cq

rsarj

XjBs

i

􀀀 _Ep

j aj

(2) kiXk:

By 53.6.(7), the _rst equation implies Ep

i = _pq

Rq

ijXj , (_pq

) 2 Z, in the same way

as in 53.6. Using ap

ij in the second equation, we _nd that the D's are independent

of S. Then the use of ai

jk implies

(3) Ep

i = 0:

The equivariance of D's with a = e, ai

j = _ij

now reads

Dp

i (X; 􀀀q

j + aq

j ;R) = Dp

i (X; 􀀀;R) + cpq

raq

jXjr

sRs

ikXk:

Di_erentiating with respect to aq

j and setting aq

j = 0, we _nd that the D's are

of the form

Dp

i = cpq

r􀀀q

jXjr

sRs

ikXk + Fp

i (Xj ;Rq

klXl):

The `absolute terms' Fp

i can be determined by lemma 53.6. This yields

(4) Dp

i = cpq

r􀀀q

jXjr

sRs

ikXk + kp

qRq

ijXj ; (kp

q ) 2 Z:

One veri_es easily that (3), (4) together with 53.6.(7){(8) and 53.4.(1){(2) is

the coordinate form of proposition 53.3. _

54. Induced linear connections on the total space of vector and principal bundles

54.1. Gauge natural operators Q _ QTB QT. Given a vector bundle

_ : E ! BE of _ber dimension n, we denote by GL(Rn;E) ! BE the bundle

of all linear frames in the individual _bers of E, see 10.11. This is a principal

bundle with structure group GL(n), n = the _ber dimension of E. Clearly E

is identi_ed with the _ber bundle associated to GL(Rn;E) with standard _ber

Rn. The construction of associated bundles establishes a natural equivalence

between the category PBm(GL(n)) and the category VBm;n := VB \ FMm;n.

A linear connection D on a vector bundle E is usually de_ned as a linear

morphism D: E ! J1E splitting the target jet projection J1E ! E, see section

17. One _nds easily that there is a canonical bijection between the linear

connections on E and the principal connections on GL(Rn;E), see 11.11. That

is why we can say that Q(GL(Rn;E)) =: QE is the bundle of linear connections

on E. In the special case E = TBE this gives a well-known fact from the theory

of classical linear connections on a manifold.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

410 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

An interesting geometrical problem is how a linear connection D on a vector

bundle E and a classical linear connection _ on the base manifold BE can

induce a classical linear connection on the total space E. More precisely, we

are looking for operators which are natural on the category VBm;n. Taking into

account the natural equivalence between VBm;n and PBm(GL(n)), we see that

this is a problem on base-extending GL(n)-natural operators. But we _nd it

more instructive to apply the direct approach in this section. Thus, our problem

is to _nd all operators Q _ QTB QT which are natural on VBm;n.

54.2. First we describe a concrete construction of such an operator. Let us

denote the covariant di_erentiation with respect to a connection by the symbol

of the connection itself. Thus, if X is a vector _eld on BE and s is a section

of E, then DXs is a section of E. Further, let XD denote the horizontal lift

of vector _eld X with respect to D. Moreover, using the translations in the

individual _bers of E, we derive from every section s: BE ! E a vertical vector

_eld sV on E called the vertical lift of s.

Proposition. For every linear connection D on a vector bundle E and every

classical linear connection _ on BE there exists a unique classical linear connection

􀀀 = 􀀀(D; _) on the total space E with the following properties

(1)

􀀀XDY D = (_XY )D; 􀀀XDsV = (DXs)V ;

􀀀sV XD = 0; 􀀀sV _V = 0;

for all vector _elds X, Y on BE and all section s, _ of E.

Proof. We use direct evaluation, because we shall need the coordinate expressions

in the sequel. Let xi, yp be some local linear coordinates on E and

Xi = dxi, Y p = dyp be the induced coordinates on TE. If

(2) dyp = Dp

qi(x)yqdxi

are the equations of D and _i(x) @

@xi or sp(x) is the coordinate form of X or s,

respectively, then DXs is expressed by

(3) @sp

@xi _i 􀀀 Dp

qisq_i:

The coordinate expression of XD is

(4) _i @

@xi + Dp

qiyq_i @

@yp

and sV is given by

(5) sp(x) @

@yp :

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

54. Induced linear connections on the total space of vector and principal bundles 411

Let

(6) dXi = _i

jkXjdxk

be the coordinate expression of _ and let

(7)

dXi = (􀀀i

jkXj + 􀀀i

pkY p)dxk + (􀀀i

jqXj + 􀀀i

pqY p)dyq;

dY p = (􀀀p

ijXi + 􀀀p

qjY q)dxj + (􀀀p

irXi + 􀀀pq

rY q)dyr

be the coordinate expression of 􀀀. Evaluating (1), we obtain

(8)

􀀀i

jk = _i

jk; 􀀀p

ij =

_

@

@xj Dp

qi

􀀀 Dp

rjDr

qi + Dp

qk_k

ij

_

yq;

􀀀j

ip = 􀀀j

pi = 0; 􀀀p

iq = 􀀀p

qi = Dp

qi; 􀀀i

pq = 0; 􀀀pq

r = 0:

This proves the existence and the uniqueness of 􀀀. _

54.3. Since the di_erence of two classical linear connections on E is a tensor

_eld of TE  T_E  T_E, we shall heavily use the gauge natural di_erence

tensors in characterizing all gauge natural operators Q _ QTB QT.

The projection T_ : TE ! TBE de_nes the dual inclusion E_T_BE ,! T_E.

The contracted curvature _(D) of D is a tensor _eld of T_BE T_BE. On the

other hand, the Liouville vector _eld L of E is a section of TE. Hence L_(D)

is one of the di_erence tensors we need.

Let _ be the horizontal form of D in the sense of 31.5, so that _ is a tensor

of TE  T_E. The contracted torsion tensor ^ S of _ is a section of T_BE and

we construct two kinds of tensor product _  ^ S and ^ S  _.

According to 28.13, all natural operators transforming _ into a section of

T_BE  T_BE form an 8-parameter family, which we denote by G(_). Hence

L  G(_) is an 8-parameter family of gauge natural di_erence tensors. Finally,

let N(_) be the 3-parameter family de_ned in 45.10.

Proposition. All gauge natural operators Q _ QTB QT form the following

15-parameter family

(1)

(1 􀀀 k1)􀀀(D;N(_)) + k1_􀀀(D;N(_)) + k2L  _(D)+

k3_  ^ S + k4 ^ S  _ + L  G(_)

where bar denotes the conjugate connection.

We remark that the list (1) is essentially simpli_ed if we assume _ to be

without torsion. Then ^ S vanishes, N(_) is reduced to _ and the 8-parameter

family G(_) is reduced to a two-parameter family generated by the two di_erent

contractions R1 and R2 of the curvature tensor of _. This yields the following

Corollary. All gauge natural operators transforming a linear connection D on

E and a linear symmetric connection _ on TBE into a linear connection on TE

form the following 4-parameter family

(2) (1 􀀀 k1)􀀀(D; _) + k1_􀀀(D; _) + L  (k2_(D) + k3R1 + k4R2):

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

412 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

54.4. To prove proposition 54.3, _rst we take into account that, analogously to

51.16 and 23.7, every gauge natural operator A: Q _ QTB QT has a _nite

order. Let Sr = Jr

0Q(Rm _ Rn ! Rm) be the _ber over 0 2 Rm of the r-th

jet prolongation of the connection bundle of the vector bundle Rm _ Rn ! Rm,

let Zr = Jr

0TRm be the _ber over 0 2 Rm of the r-th jet prolongation of the

connection bundle of TRm and V be the _ber over 0 2 Rm of the connection

bundle of T(Rm _ Rn) with respect to the total projection QT(Rm _ Rn) !

(Rm _ Rn) ! Rm. Then all Sr, Zr, Rn and V are Wr+1

m (GL(n)) =: Wr+1

m;n -

spaces. In fact, Wr+1

m;n acts on Zr by means of the base homomorphisms into

Gr+1

m , on Rn by means of the canonical projection into GL(n) and on V by means

of the jet homomorphism into W1

m;n. The r-th order gauge natural operators

A: Q _ QTB QT are in bijection with Wr+1

m;n -equivariant maps (denoted by

the same symbol) A: Sr_Zr_Rn ! V satisfying q _A = pr3, where q : V ! Rn

is the canonical projection.

Formula 54.2.(2) induces on Sr the jet coordinates

(1) D_ = (Dp

qi_); 0 _ j_j _ r

where _ is a multi index of range m. On Zr, 54.2.(6) induces analogously the

coordinates

(2) __ = (_i

jk_); 0 _ j_j _ r:

On V , we consider the coordinates y = (yp) and

(3) 􀀀A

BC; A; B; C = 1; : : : ;m + n

given by 54.2.(7). Hence the coordinate expression of any smooth map f : Sr _

Zr _ Rn ! V satisfying q _ f = pr3 is yp = yp and

(4) 􀀀A

BC = fA

BC(D_;__; y):

The coordinate form of a linear isomorphism of vector bundle Rm_Rn ! Rm

is

(5) _xi = fi(x); _yp = fp

q (x)yq:

The induced coordinates on Wr+1

m;n are

ai

_ = @_fi(0); ap

q_ = @_fp

q (0); 0 < j_j _ r + 1; 0 _ j_j _ r + 1:

The above-mentioned homomorphism Wr+1

m;n

! Gr+1

m consists in suppressing the

coordinates ap

q_.

The standard action of G2

m on Z0 is given by 25.2.(3). The action of W1

m;n

on S0 is a special case of 52.1.(5) for the group G = GL(n). This yields

(6) _D p

qi = apr􀀀r

sj~asq

~aj

i + ap

rj~arq

~aj

i :

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

54. Induced linear connections on the total space of vector and principal bundles 413

The canonical action of GL(n) on Rn is

(7) _yp = apq

yq:

Using standard evaluation, we deduce from 54.2.(7) that the action of W1

m;n on

V is (7) and

ai

jk + ail

􀀀l

jk = _􀀀i

lmal

jamk

+_

􀀀

i

plap

qjyqal

k +_

􀀀

i

lpal

jap

qkyq +_􀀀i

pqap

rjyraq

(8) skys

ail

􀀀l

pj = _􀀀i

qkaq

pakj

+_

􀀀

i

qraq

par

(9) sjys

ail

􀀀l

jp = _􀀀i

kqakj

aq

p +_

􀀀

i

qraq

sjysar

p (10)

ail

􀀀l

pq = _

􀀀

i

rsar

pasq

(11)

ap

qijyq + ap

qkyq􀀀k

ij + apq

􀀀q

ij = _

􀀀

p

klaki

al

j +_

􀀀

p

qlaq

riyral

j(12) +

_􀀀

p

kqaki

aq

rjyr +_􀀀pq

raq

siysar

tjyt

ap

rkyr􀀀kq

i + ap

qi + apr

􀀀rq

i = _

􀀀

p

rkarq

aki

+_􀀀pr

sarq

as

(13) tiyt

ap

rkyr􀀀k

iq + ap

qi + apr

􀀀r

iq = _

􀀀

p

jraj

i arq

+_􀀀pr

sar

tiytasq

(14)

ap

sjys􀀀j

qr + aps

􀀀sq

r = _

􀀀

p

stasq

at

r (15)

54.5. Let H _ Wr+1

m;n be the subgroup determined by the (r + 1)-th jets of the

products of linear isomorphisms on both Rm and Rn, which is canonically isomorphic

to GL(m)_GL(n). The standard prolongation procedure and 54.5.(8){(15)

imply that the actions of H on Dp

qi_, _i

jk_ and 􀀀A

BC are tensorial.

Consider the equivariance of fi

pq with respect to the _ber homotheties. This

yields

k􀀀2fi

pq = fi

pq(D_;__; ky):

Multiplying by k2 and letting k ! 0, we obtain

(1) 􀀀i

pq = fi

pq = 0:

The equivariance of fi

jp with respect to the _ber homotheties gives

k􀀀1fi

jp = fi

jp(D_;__; ky):

This implies in the same way

(2) 􀀀i

jp = 0:

For fi

pj and fp

qr we _nd quite similarly

(3) 􀀀i

pj = 0; 􀀀pq

r = 0:

For fp

qi the _ber homotheties give

fp

qi = fp

qi(D_;__; ky):

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

414 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

Letting k ! 0 we _nd fp

qi are independent of yp. Then the base homotheties

yield

kfp

qi = fp

qi(k1+j_jD_; k1+j_j__):

By the homogeneous function theorem, fp

qi are linear in Dp

qi, _i

jk and independent

of D_, __ with j_j > 0, j_j > 0. By the generalized invariant tensor theorem,

we obtain

(4) fp

qi = aDp

qi + b_p

qDr

ri + c_p

q_j

ji + d_p

q_j

ij :

Let K _ Wr+1

m;n be the subgroup characterized by ai

j = _ij

, apq

= _p

q . By 25.2.(3),

54.4.(6) and 54.4.(13), the equivariance of (4) on K reads

ap

qi = aap

qi + b_p

q arr

i + c_p

q aj

ji + d_p

q ai

ij :

This implies a = 1, b = 0, c + d = 0, i.e.

(5) 􀀀p

qi = Dp

qi + c1_p

q(_j

ji

􀀀 _j

ij); c1 2 R:

For fp

iq we deduce in the same way

(6) 􀀀p

iq = Dp

qi + c2_p

q(_j

ji

􀀀 _j

ij); c2 2 R:

The _ber homotheties yield that fi

jk is independent of yp. Then the base

homotheties imply that fi

jk is linear in Dp

qi, _i

jk and independent of Dp

qi_, _i

jk_

with j_j > 0, j_j > 0. By the generalized invariant tensor theorem, we obtain

(7)

fi

jk = a_i

jk + b_i

kj + c_ij

_l

lk + d_ij

_l

kl+

e_ik

_l

lj + f_ik

_l

jl + g_ij

Dp

pk + h_ik

Dp

pj:

By 25.2.(3), 54.4.(6) and 54.4.(8), the equivariance of (7) on K reads

ai

jk = (a + b)ai

jk + (c + d)_ij

al

lk + (e + f)_ik

al

lj + g_ij

ap

pk + h_ik

ap

pj:

This implies a + b = 1, c + d = e + f = g = h = 0, i.e.

(8) 􀀀i

jk = (1 􀀀 c3)_i

jk + c3_i

kj + c4_ij

(_l

lk

􀀀 _l

kl) + c5_ik(_l

lj

􀀀 _l

jl):

54.6. The study of fp

ij is quite analogous to 54.5, but it leads to more extended

evaluations. That is why we do not perform all of them in detail here. The _ber

homotheties yield

kfp

ij = fp

ij(D_;__; ky):

By the homogeneous function theorem, fp

ij is linear in yp, i.e.

fp

ij = Fp

ijq(D_;__)yq:

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

54. Induced linear connections on the total space of vector and principal bundles 415

The base homotheties then imply

k2Fp

ijq = Fp

ijq(k1+j_jD_; k1+j_j__):

By the homogeneous function theorem, Fp

ijq is linear in Dp

qij , _i

jkl, bilinear in

Dp

qi, _i

jk and independent of Dp

qi_, _i

jk_ with j_j > 1, j_j > 1. Using the generalized

invariant tensor theorem, we obtain Fp

ijq in the form of a 40-parameter

family. The equivariance of fp

ij with respect to K then yields

􀀀p

ij =

_

(1 􀀀 c6)Dp

qij + c6Dp

qji + c7_p

q (Dr

rij

􀀀 Dr

(1) rji)􀀀

c6Dp

riDr

qj + (c6 􀀀 1)Dp

rjDr

qi + (1 􀀀 c3)Dp

qk_k

ij + c3Dp

qk_kj

i+

(c4 􀀀 c1)Dp

qi(_l

lj

􀀀 _l

jl) + (c5 􀀀 c2)Dp

qj(_l

li

􀀀 _l

il)+

_p

qGij(_)

_

yq

where Gij(_) is the coordinate form of G(_).

One veri_es directly that (1) and 54.5.(1){(3), (5), (6), (8) is the coordinate

expression of 54.3.(1). _

54.7. The case of principal bundles. An analogous problem is to study the

gauge natural operators transforming a connection D on a principal G-bundle

_ : P ! BP and a classical linear connection _ on the base manifold BP into a

classical linear connection on the total space P. First we present a geometrical

construction of such an operator.

Let vA be the vertical component of a vector A 2 TyP and bA be its projection

to the base manifold. Consider a vector _eld X on BP such that j1

xX = _(bA),

x = _(y). Construct the lift XD of X and the fundamental vector _eld '(vA)

determined by vA. An easy calculation shows that the rule

(1) A 7! j1

y(XD + '(vA))

determines a classical linear connection NP (D; _): TP ! J1(TP ! P) on P.

54.8. We are going to determine all gauge natural operators of the above type.

The result of 54.3 suggests us that the case _ is without torsion is much simpler

than the general case. That is why we restrict ourselves to a symmetric _. Since

the di_erence of two classical linear connections on P is a tensor _eld of type

TP  T_P  T_P, we characterize all gauge natural operators in question as

a sum of the operator N from 54.7 and of the gauge natural di_erence tensor

_elds. We construct geometrically the following 3 systems of di_erence tensor

_elds.

I. The connection form of D is a linear map !: TP ! g. Take any bilinear

map f1 : g _ g ! g and compose ! _ ! with f1. This de_nes an n3-parameter

system of di_erence tensor _elds TP  TP ! V P, n = dimG.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

416 Chapter XII. Gauge natural bundles and operators

II. The curvature form D! of ! is a bilinear map TP _ TP ! g. Take any

linear map f2 : g ! g and compose D! with f2. This yields an n2-parameter

system of di_erence tensor _elds.

III. By 28.7, all natural operators transforming a linear symmetric connection

_ on BP into a tensor _eld of T_BP T_BP form a 2-parameter family linearly

generated by both di_erent contractions R1 and R2 of the curvature tensor of _.

The tangent map of the bundle projection P ! BP de_nes the dual injection

P _ T_BP ! T_P. Taking any fundamental vector _eld _ Y determined by a

vector Y 2 g, we obtain a 2n-parameter system of di_erence tensor _elds linearly

generated by _ Y  R1 and _ Y  R2.

54.9. Proposition. All gauge natural operators transforming a connection on

P and a classical linear symmetric connection of the base manifold BP into

a classical linear connection on P form the (n3 + n2 + 2n)-parameter family

generated by operator N and by the above families I, II, and III of the di_erence

tensor _elds.

The proof consists in straightforward application of our techniques, but it is

too long to be performed here. We refer the reader to [Kol_a_r, to appear a].

Remarks

Our approach to gauge natural bundles and operators generalizes directly the

theory of natural bundles. So we also prove the regularity originally assumed

in [Eck, 81]. Let us mention that, analogously to chapter XI, we can de_ne

the Lie derivative of sections of gauge natural bundles with respect to the right

invariant vector _elds on the corresponding principal _ber bundles and then

the in_nitesimally gauge natural operators. The relation between the gauge

naturality and in_nitesimal gauge naturality is similar to the case of natural

bundles if the gauge group is connected; more information can be found in [Cap,

Slov_ak, 92].

The _rst application of our methods for _nding gauge natural operators was

presented in [Kol_a_r, 87b]. The considerations in that paper are restricted to

the case the structure group is the general linear group GL(n) in an arbitrary

dimension (independent of the dimension of the base manifold), for in such a

case one can apply directly the results from chapter VI. [Kol_a_r, 87b] has also

determined all GL(n)-natural operators transforming a principal connection on

a principal bundle P and a classical linear connection on the base manifold into

a principal connection on W1P. The curvature-like operators were found in the

special case G = GL(n) in [Kol_a_r, 87b] and the general problem was solved

in [Kol_a_r, to appear a]. The greater part of the results from section 52 was

deduced in [Kol_a_r, to appear b]. Proposition 53.3 was proved for the special

case G = GL(n) in [Kol_a_r, 91], the general result is _rst presented in this book.

Section 54 is based on [Gancarzewicz, Kol_a_r, 91].

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

417

References

Albert, C.; Molino, P., Pseudogroupes de Lie transitifs I. Structures di_erentiables, Collection

Travaux en cours, Hermann, Paris, 1984.

Atiyah, M.; Bott, R.; Patodi, V.K., On the heat equation and the index theorem, Inventiones

Math. 19 (1973), 279{330.

Baston, R. J., Verma modules and di_erential conformal invariants, J. Di_erential Geometry

32 (1990), 851{898.

Baston, R. J., Almost Hermitian symmetric manifolds, I: Local twistor theory; II: Di_erential

invariants, Preprints (1990).

Baston, R.J.; Eastwood, M.G., Invariant operators, Twistors in mathematics and physics,

Lecture Notes in Mathematics 156, Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Boe, B. D.; Collingwood, D. H., A comparison theory for the structure of induced representations

I., J. of Algebra 94 (1985), 511-545.

Boe, B. D.; Collingwood, D. H., A comparison theory for the structure of induced representations

II., Math. Z. 190 (1985), 1-11.

Boerner, H., Darstellungen von Gruppen, 2nd ed., Springer, Grundlehren der math. Wissenschaften

74, Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1967.

Boman, J., Di_erentiability of a function and of its composition with a function of one variable,

Math. Scand. 20 (1967), 249{268.

Branson, T. P., Di_erential operators canonically associated to a conformal structure, Math.

Scand. 57 (1985), 293{345.

Branson, T. P., Conformal transformations, conformal change, and conformal covariants,

Proceedings of the Winter School on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1988, Suppl. Rendiconti

Circolo Mat. Palermo, Serie II 21 (1989), 115{134.

Branson T. P., Second-order conformal covariants I., II., K_benhavns universitet matematisk

institut, Preprint Series, No. 2, 3, (1989).

Brocker, T.; Janich, K., Einfuhrung in die Di_erentialtopologie, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg,

1973.

Cabras, A.; Canarutto, D.; Kol_a_r, I.; Modugno, M., Structured bundles, Pitagora Editrice,

Bologna, 1991.

Cahen, M.; de Wilde, M.; Gutt, S., Local cohomology of the algebra of C1-functions on a

connected manifold, Lett. Math. Phys. 4 (1980), 157{167.

Cantrijn, F.; Crampin, M.; Sarlet, W; Saunders, D., The canonical isomorphism between

TkT_M and T_TkM, CRAS Paris, S_erie II 309 (1989), 1509{1514.

Cap, A., All linear and bilinear natural concomitants of vector valued di_erential forms, Comment.

Math. Univ. Carolinae 31 (1990), 567{587.

Cap, A., Natural operators between vector valued di_erential forms, Proccedings of the Winter

School on Geometry and Physics (Srn__ 1990), Rend. Circ. Mat. Palermo (2) Suppl. 26

(1991), 113{121.

Cap, A.; Slov_ak, J., In_nitesimally natural operators are natural, Di_. Geo. Appl. 2 (1992),

45{55.

Cartan, _E., Le_cons sur la th_eorie des espaces _a connexion projective, Paris, 1937.

Chrastina, J., On a theorem of J. Peetre, Arch. Math. (Brno) 23 (1987), 71{76.

Cohen, R., A proof of the immersion conjecture, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 79 (1982), 3390{

3392.

Crittenden, R., Covariant di_erentiation, Quart. J. Math. Oxford Ser. 13 (1962), 285{298.

Dekr_et, A., On canonical forms on non-holonomic and semi-holonomic prolongations of principal

_bre bundles, Czech. Math. J. 22 (1972), 653{662.

Dekr_et, A., Mechanical structures and connections, Proceedings, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia, 1988,

pp. 121{132.

Dekr_et, A., Vector _elds and connections on _bred manifolds, Suppl. Rendiconti del Circolo

Matematico di Palermo, Serie II 22 (1990), 25{34.

Dekr_et, A., On mechanical systems of second order on manifolds, to appear in Proc. Conference

Eger.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

418 References

Dekr_et, A., Vector _elds and connections on TM, to appear in _Casopis p_est. mat.

Dekr_et, A.; Vosmansk_a, G., Natural transformations of 2-quasijets, to appear.

de Le_on, M.; Rodrigues, P. R., Generalized Classical Mechanics and Field Theory, North-

Holland Mathematical Studies, 112, Amsterdam, 1985.

de Le_on, M.; Rodrigues, P. R., Dynamical connections and non-autonomous Lagrangian systems,

Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. IX (1988), 171{181.

de Wilde, M.; Lecomte, P., Algebraic characterizations of the algebra of functions and of the

Lie algebra of vector _elds on a manifold, Compositio Math. 45 (1982), 199{205.

Dieudonn_e, J. A., Foundations of modern analysis, I, Academic Press, New York { London,

1960.

Dieudonn_e, J. A.; Carrell, J. B., Invariant Theory, Old and New, Academic Press, New York

{ London, 1971.

Donaldson, S., An application of gauge theory to the topology of 4-manifolds, J. Di_. Geo. 18

(1983), 269{316.

Doupovec, M., Natural operators transforming vector _elds to the second order tangent bundle,

_Cas. p_est. mat. 115 (1990), 64{72.

Doupovec, M., Natural transformations between T2

1 T_M and T_T2

1M, Ann. Polon. Math. LVI

(1991), 67-77.

Doupovec, M., Natural transformations of third tangent and cotangent bundles, to appear in

Czechoslovak Math. J.

Doupovec, M.; Kol_a_r, I., On the natural operators transforming connections to the tangent

bundle of a _bred manifold, Kni_znice VUT Brno B-119 (1988), 47{56.

Doupovec, M.; Kol_a_r, I., Natural a_nors on time-dependent Weil bundles, to appear in Arch.

Math. (Brno).

Eastwood, M. G.; Graham, C. R., Invariants of CR Densities, Proccedings of Symposia in

Pure Mathematics, Part 2 52 (1991), 117{133.

Eastwood, M. G.; Graham, C. R., Invariants of conformal densities, Duke Math. J. 63 (1991),

633{671.

Eastwood, M. G.; Rice, J. W., Conformally invariant di_erential operators on Minkowski

space and their curved analogues, Commun. Math. Phys. 109 (1987), 207{228.

Eastwood, M. G.; Tod, P., Edth { a di_erential operator on the sphere, Math. Proc. Cambr.

Phil. Soc. 92 (1982), 317{330.

Eck, D. J., Gauge-natural bundles and generalized gauge theories, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.

247 (1981).

Eck, D. J., Invariants of k-jet actions, Houston J. Math. 10 (1984), 159{168.

Eck, D. J., Product preserving functors on smooth manifolds, J. Pure and Applied Algebra 42

(1986), 133{140.

Eck, D. J., Natural sheaves, Illinois J. Math. 31 (1987), 200{207.

Ehresmann, C., Les connections in_nit_esimales dans un espace _br_e di__erentiable, Coll. de

Topo., Bruxelles, C.B.R.M., 1950, pp. 29{55.

Ehresmann, C., Les prolongements d'une vari_et_e di__erentiable, I: Calcul des jets, prolongement

principal, C. R. A. S. Paris 233 (1951), 598{600.

Ehresmann, C., Les prolongements d'une vari_et_e di__erentiable, II: L'espace des jets d'ordre r

de Vn dans Vm, C. R. A. S. Paris 233 (1951), 777{779.

Ehresmann, C., Structures locales et structures in_nit_esimales, C. R. A. S. Paris 234 (1952),

1081{1083.

Ehresmann, C., Les prolongements d'une vari_et_e di__erentiable, IV: El_ements de contact et

_el_ements d'enveloppe, C. R. A. S. Paris 234 (1952), 1028{1030.

Ehresmann, C., Extension du calcul des jets aux jets non holonomes, C. R. A. S. Paris 239

(1954), 1762{1764.

Ehresmann, C., Les prolongements d'un espace _br_e di__erentiable, C. R. A. S. Paris (1955),

1755{1757.

Ehresmann, C., Sur les connexions d'ordre sup_eriour, Atti V Cong. Un. Mat. Italiana, Pavia{

Torino, 1956, pp. 326{328.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

References 419

Ehresmann, C., Gattungen von Lokalen Strukturen, Jahresber. d. Deutschen Math. 60-2

(1957), 49{77.

Eilenberg, S., Foundations of _ber bundles, University of Chicago, Summer 1957.

Epstein, D. B. A., Natural vector bundles, Category Theory, Homology Theory and their

Applications III,, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 99, 1969, pp. 171{195.

Epstein, D.B.A., Natural tensors on Riemannian manifolds, J. Di_. Geom. 10 (1975), 631{

645.

Epstein, D. B. A.; Thurston W. P., Transformation groups and natural bundles, Proc. London

Math. Soc. 38 (1979), 219{236.

Fe_erman, C., Parabolic invariant theory in complex analysis, Adv. Math. 31 (1979), 131{262.

Fe_erman, C.; Graham, R., Conformal invariants, _Elie Cartan et les Math_ematiques d'Aujourd'hui,

Ast_erisque, hors serie, 1985, pp. 95{116.

Fegan, H. D., Conformally invariant _rst order di_erential operators, Quart. J. Math. 27

(1976), 371{378.

Feigin, B. L.; Fuks, D. B., On invariant di_erential operators on the line, (Russian), Funct.

Anal. and its Appl. 13 No 4 (1979), 91{92.

Ferraris, M.; Francaviglia, M.; Reina, C., Sur les _br_es d'objets g_eometriques et leurs applications

physiques, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar_e, Section A 38 (1983), 371{383.

Freedman, M. H., The topology of four dimensional manifolds, J. Di_. Geo. 17 (1982), 357{

454.

Freedman, M. H.; Luo, Feng, Selected Applications of Geometry to Low-Dimensional Topology,

University Lecture Series 1, Amer. Math. Soc., 1989.

Frolicher, A., Smooth structures, Category theory 1981, LN 962, Springer-Verlag, pp. 69{82.

Frolicher, A.; Kriegl, A., Linear spaces and di_erentiation theory, Pure and Applied Mathematics,

J. Wiley, Chichester, 1988.

Frolicher, A.; Nijenhuis, A., Theory of vector valued di_erential forms. Part I., Indagationes

Math 18 (1956), 338{359.

Frolicher, A.; Nijenhuis, A., Invariance of vector form operations under mappings, Comm.

Math. Helv. 34 (1960), 227{248.

Fuks, D. B., Cohomology of in_nite dimensional Lie algebras, (Russian), Nauka, Moscow,

1984.

Gancarzewicz, J., Local triviality of a bundle of geometric objects, Zeszyty Nauk. Uniw. Jagiellon.

Prace Mat. 23 (1982), 39{42.

Gancarzewicz, J., Des rel_evements des fonctions aux _br_es naturels, CRAS Paris, S_erie I 295

(1982), 743{746.

Gancarzewicz, J., Liftings of functions and vector _elds to natural bundles, Warszawa 1983,

Dissertationes Mathematicae CCXII.

Gancarzewicz, J., Rel_evements des champs de vecteurs aux _br_es naturels, CRAS Paris, S_erie

I 296 (1983), 59{61.

Gancarzewicz, J., Di_erential Geometry (Polish), PWN, Warszawa, 1987.

Gancarzewicz, J., Horizontal lifts of linear connections to the natural vector bundles, Research

Notes in Math. 121, Pitman, 1985, pp. 318-341.

Gancarzewicz, J.; Mahi, S., Lifts of 1-forms to the tangent bundle of higher order, to appear.

Gancarzewicz, J.; Kol_a_r, I., Some gauge-natural operators on linear connections, Monatsh.

Math. 111 (1991), 23{33.

Gancarzewicz, J.; Kol_a_r, I., Natural a_nors on the extended r-th order tangent bundles, to

appear in Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo.

Gheorghiev, G., Sur les prolongements r_eguliers des espaces _br_es et les groupes de Lie associ

_es, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 266, A (1968), 65{68.

Gilkey, P. B., Curvature and the eigenvalues of the Laplacian for elliptic complexes, Advances

in Math. 10 (1973), 344{382.

Gilkey, P. B., The spectral geometry of a Riemannian manifold, J. Di_. Geom. 10 (1975),

601{618.

Gilkey, P.B., Local invariants of a pseudo-Riemannian manifold, Math. Scand. 36 (1975),

109{130.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

420 References

Gilkey, P. B., Invariance Theory, The Heat Equation, And the Atiyah-Singer Index Theorem,

Mathematics Lecture Series 11, Publish or Perish Inc., Wilmington, Delaware, 1984.

Goldschmidt, H; Sternberg, S., The Hamilton formalism in the calculus of variations, Ann.

Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) 23 (1973), 203{267.

Gollek, H., Anwendungen der Jet-Theorie auf Faserbundel und Liesche Transformationgruppen,

Math. Nachr. 53 (1972), 161{180.

Gompf, R., Three exotic R4's and other anomalies, J. Di_. Geo. 18 (1983), 317{328.

Gover, A. R., Conformally invariant operators of standard type, Quart. J. Math. 40 (1989),

197{208.

Graham, C. R., Non-existence of curved conformally invariant operators, Preprint (1990).

Greub, W.; Halperin, S.; Vanstone, R., Connections, Curvature, and Cohomology I, II, III,

Academic Press, New York and London, 1972, 1973, 1976.

Grozman, P. Ya., Local invariant bilinear operators on tensor _elds on the plane, (Russian),

Vestnik MGU, Ser. Mat., Mech. No 6 (1980), 3{6.

Grozman, P. Ya., Classi_cation of bilinear invariant operators on tensor _elds, (Russian),

Funct. Anal. and its Appl. 14 No 2 (1980), 58{59.

Gurevich, G. B., Foundations of the theory of algebraic invariants, (Russian), OGIZ, Moscow-

Leningrad, 1948.

Hilgert, J.; Neeb, K.-H., Lie-Gruppen und Lie-Algebren, Vieweg, Braunschweig, 1991.

Hirsch, M. W., Di_erential topology, GTM 33, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1976.

Hochschild, G. P., Introduction to a_ne algebraic groups, Holden Day, San Francisco, 1971.

Jacobson, N., Lie algebras, J. Wiley-Interscience, 1962.

Jakobsen, H. P., Conformal invariants, Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ 22 (1986), 345{364.

Jany_ska, J., Geometric properties of prolongation functors, _Casopis p_est. mat. 108 (1983).

Jany_ska J., On natural operations with linear connections, Czechoslovak Math. J. 35 (1985),

106{115.

Jany_ska J., Natural and gauge-natural operators on the space of linear connections on a vector

bundle, Di_erential Geometry and Its Applications, Proc. Conf. Brno 1989,World Scienti_c

Publ. Co., Singapore, 1990, pp. 58{68.

Jany_ska, J., Natural operations with projectable tangent valued forms on a _bred manifold,

Annali di Mat. CLIX (1991), 171{187.

Jany_ska J., Remarks on almost complex connections, to appear.

Jany_ska J.; Kol_a_r I., Lie derivatives on vector bundles, Proceedings of the conference on

di_erential geometry and its applications, Universita Karlova Praha, 1982, pp. 111{116.

Jany_ska J.; Kol_a_r I., On the connections naturally induced on the second order frame bundle,

Arch. Math. (Brno) 22 (1986), 21{28.

Jany_ska J.; Modugno, M., In_nitesimal natural and gauge-natural lifts, to appear.

Joris, H, Une C1-application non-immersive qui poss_ede la propri_et_e universelle des immersions.,

Archiv Math. 39 (1982), 269{277.

Kainz, G.; Kriegl, A.; Michor, P. W., C1-algebras from the functional analytic viewpoint, J.

pure appl. Algebra 46 (1987), 89-107.

Kainz, G.; Michor, P. W., Natural transformations in di_erential geometry, Czechoslovak

Math. J. 37 (1987), 584-607.

Kirillov, A. A., On invariant di_erential operations over geometric quantities, (Russian), Func.

Anal. and its Appl. 11 No 2 (1977), 39{44.

Kirillov, A. A., Invariant operators over geometric quantities, Current problems in mathematics,

Vol 16, (Russian), VINITI, 1980, pp. 3{29.

Klein, T., Connections on higher order tangent bundles, _Casopis p_est. mat. 106 (1981), 414{

421.

Kobak, P., Natural liftings of vector _elds to tangent bundles of 1-forms, Mathematica Bohemica

116 (1991), 319{326.

Kobayashi, S., Theory of connections, Annali di matematica pura et applicata 43 (1957),

119{185.

Kobayashi, S., Canonical forms on frame bundles of higher order contact, Proc. of symposia

in pure math., vol III, A.M.S., 1961, pp. 186{193.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

References 421

Kobayashi, S.; Nomizu, K., Foundations of Di_erential Geometry. Vol I, J. Wiley-Interscience,

1963; Vol. II, 1969.

Kock, A., Synthetic Di_erential Geometry, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes Series

51, Cambridge, 1981.

Kol_a_r, I., Complex velocities on real manifolds, Czechoslovak Math. J. 21 (96) (1971), 118{

123.

Kol_a_r, I., Canonical forms on the prolongations of principal _bre bundles, Rev. Roumaine

Math. Pures Appl. 16 (1971), 1091{1106.

Kol_a_r, I., On the prolongations of geometric object _elds, An. Sti. Univ. "Al. I. Cuza" Iasi 17

(1971), 437{446.

Kol_a_r, I., On manifolds with connection, Czechoslovak Math. J. 23 (98) (1973), 34{44.

Kol_a_r, I., On the absolute di_erentiation of geometric object _elds, Annales Polonici Mathematici

27 (1973), 293{304.

Kol_a_r, I., On some operations with connections, Math. Nachr. 69 (1975), 297{306.

Kol_a_r, I., Generalized G-structures and G-structures of higher order, Boll. Un. Mat. Ital., Supl

fasc. 3 12 (1975), 245{256.

Kol_a_r, I., On the invariant method in di_erential geometry of submanifolds, Czechoslovak

Math. J. 27 (102) (1977), 96{113.

Kol_a_r, I., On the automorphisms of principal _bre bundles, CMUC 21 (1980), 309{312.

Kol_a_r, I., Structure morphisms of prolongation functors, Mathematica Slovaca 30 (1980),

83{93.

Kol_a_r, I., Connections in 2-_bred manifolds, Arch. Math. (Brno) XVII (1981), 23{30.

Kol_a_r, I., Fiber parallelism and connections, Proceedings of Colloquium Global Di_erential Geometry

/ Global Analysis, West Berlin, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 838, 1981, pp. 165{

173.

Kol_a_r, I., On generalized connections, Beitrage zur Algebra und Geometrie 11 (1981), 29{34.

Kol_a_r, I., Lie derivatives and higher order Lagrangians, Proceedings of the conference on

di_erential geometry and its applications, Universita Karlova Praha, 1982, pp. 117{123.

Kol_a_r, I., Prolongations of generalized connections, Colloq. Math. Societatis J_anos Bolyai, 31.

Di_erential Geometry, Budapest (Hungary) 1979, North Holland, 1982, pp. 317{325.

Kol_a_r, I., On the second tangent bundle and generalized Lie derivatives, Tensor, N. S. 38

(1982), 98{102.

Kol_a_r, I., Functorial prolongations of Lie groups and their actions, _Cas. p_est. mat. 108 (1983),

289{293.

Kol_a_r, I., Natural transformations of the second tangent functor into itself, Arch. Math. (Brno)

XX (1984), 169{172.

Kol_a_r, I., A geometrical version of the higher order Hamilton formalism in _bred manifolds,

Journal of Geometry and Physics 1 (1984), 127{137.

Kol_a_r, I., Higher order absolute di_erentiation with respect to generalized connections, Di_erential

Geometry, Banach Center Publications, Volume 12, Warsaw, 1984, pp. 153{162.

Kol_a_r, I., Natural operations with connections on second order frame bundles, Colloquia Mathematica

Societatis J_anos Bolyai, 46. Topics in Di_erential Geometry, Debrecen (Hungary),

1984, pp. 715{732.

Kol_a_r, I., Covariant approach to natural transformations of Weil functors, Comment. Math.

Univ. Carolin. 27 (1986), 723{729.

Kol_a_r, I., Some natural operations with connections, Journal of National Academy of Mathematics,

India 5 (1987), 127{141.

Kol_a_r, I., Some natural operators in di_erential geometry, Proc. "Conf. Di_. Geom. and Its

Applications", Brno 1986, Dordrecht, 1987, pp. 91{110.

Kol_a_r, I., On the natural operators on vector _elds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 6 (1988), 109{

117.

Kol_a_r, I., Lie derivatives of sectorform _elds, Colloq. math. LV (1988), 71{78.

Kol_a_r, I., Functorial prolongations of r-connections, Lecture Notes, Universitat Leipzig, 1988,

10p.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

422 References

Kol_a_r, I., On some gauge-natural operators, Seminari dell' Instituto di Matematica Applicata

"Giovanni Sansone", Firenze 1989, 98 p.

Kol_a_r, I., General natural bundles and operators, Proceedings of Conference on Di_erential

Geometry and Applications, Brno 1989, World-Scienti_c, Singapure, 1990, pp. 69{78.

Kol_a_r, I., Natural operators transforming vector _elds and exterior forms into exterior forms,

Scienti_c Periodical of Salesian Technical University 64 (1990), 135{139.

Kol_a_r, I., Gauge-natural operators transforming connections to the tangent bundle, The Mathematical

Heritage of C. F. Gauss, World Scienti_c Publ. Co., Singapore, 1991, pp. 416{426.

Kol_a_r, I., Some gauge-natural operators on connections, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis

J_anos Bolyai, 56. Di_erential Geometry, Eger (Hungary), 1989 (J. Szenthe, L. Tam_assy,

eds.), J_anos Bolyai Math. Soc. and Elsevier, Budapest and Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 435{446.

Kol_a_r, I., Gauge natural forms of Chern Weil type, to appear in Ann. Global Anal. Geom..

Kol_a_r, I., An abstract characterization of the jet spaces, to appear.

Kol_a_r, I.; Le_sovsk_y, V., Structure equations of generalized connections, _Cas. p_est. mat. 107

(1982), 253{256.

Kol_a_r, I.; Michor, P. W., All natural concomitants of vector valued di_erential forms, Proceedings

of the Winter School on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1987, Suppl. Rendiconti Circolo

Mat. Palermo, Serie II 16 (1987), 101-108.

Kol_a_r, I.; Modugno, M., Natural maps on the iterated jet prolongation of a _bred manifold,

Annali di Matematica CLVIII (1991), 151{165.

Kol_a_r, I.; Modugno, M., Torsions of connections on some natural bundles, Di_erential Geometry

and Its Applications 2 (1992), 1{16.

Kol_a_r, I.; Radziszewski, Z., Natural transformations of second tangent and cotangent functors,

Czechoslovak Math. J. 38 (113) (1988), 274{279.

Kol_a_r, I.; Slov_ak, J., On the geometric functors on manifolds, Proceedings of the Winter School

on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1988, Suppl. Rendiconti Circolo Mat. Palermo, Serie II 21

(1989), 223{233.

Kol_a_r, I.; Slov_ak, J., Prolongation of vector _elds to jet bundles, Proceedings of the Winter

School on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1989,, Suppl. Rendiconti Circolo Mat. Palermo,

Serie II 22 (1990), 103{111.

Kol_a_r, I.; Vosmansk_a, G., Natural operations with second order jets, Supplemento ai Rendiconti

del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Serie II 14 (1987), 179{186.

Kol_a_r, I.; Vosmansk_a, G., Natural transformations of higher order tangent bundles and jet

spaces, _Cas. p_est. mat. 114 (1989), 181{186.

Kosmann-Schwarzbach, Y., Vector _elds and generalized vector _elds on _bred manifolds,

Lecture Notes in Mathematics 792, 1980, pp. 307{355.

Koszul, J. L., Fibre bundles and di_erential geometry, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research,

Bombay, 1960.

Kowalski, O.; Sekizawa, M., Natural transformations of Riemannian metrics on manifolds to

metrics on linear frame bundles | a classi_cation, Di_erential Geometry and Its Applications,

Proceedings, D. Reidel Publishing Company, 1987, pp. 149{178.

Kowalski, O.; Sekizawa, M., Natural transformations of Riemannian metrics on manifolds to

metrics on tangent bundles | a classi_cation, Bulletin of Tokyo Gakugei University, Sect.

IV 40 (1988), 1{29.

Kriegl, A., Die richtigen Raume fur Analysis im Unendlich - Dimensionalen, Monatshefte

Math. 94 (1982), 109{124.

Kriegl, A.; Michor, P. W., Aspects of the theory of in_nite dimensional manifolds, Di_erential

Geometry and Applications 1 (1991), 159{176.

Krupka, D., Elementary theory of di_erential invariants, Arch. Math. (Brno) XIV (1978),

207{214.

Krupka, D., Fundamental vector _elds on type _bres of jet prolongations of tensor bundles,

Math. Slovaca 29 (1979), 159{167.

Krupka, D., On the Lie algebras of higher di_erential groups, Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., S_er.

math. 27 (1979), 235{239.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

References 423

Krupka, D., Reducibility theorems for di_erentiable liftings in _ber bundles, Arch. Math.

(Brno) XV (1979), 93{106.

Krupka, D., A remark on algebraic identities for the covariant derivative of the curvature

tensor, Arch. Math. (Brno) XVI (1980), 205{212.

Krupka, D., Finite order liftings in principal _bre bundles, Beitrage zur Algebra und Geometrie

11 (1981), 21{27.

Krupka, D., Local invariants of a linear connection, Colloq. Math. Societatis J_anos Bolyai,

31. Di_erential Geometry, Budapest (Hungary) 1979, North Holland, 1982, pp. 349{369.

Krupka, D., Natural Lagrangian structures, Di_erential Geometry, Banach Center Publications,

volume 12, Warsaw, 1984, pp. 185{210.

Krupka D.; Jany_ska J., Lectures on di_erential invariants, Univerzita J. E. Purkyn_e, Brno,

1990.

Krupka, D.; Mikol_a_sov_a V., On the uniqueness of some di_erential invariants: d, [ ; ], r,

Czechoslovak Math. J. 34 (1984), 588{597.

Krupka, D.; Trautman, A., General Invariance of Lagrangian Structures, Bull. Acad. Polon.

Sci., S_er. math. 22 (1974), 207{211.

Kurek, J., On natural operators on sectorform _elds, _Cas. p_est. mat. 115 (1990), 232{239.

Kurek, J., On the natural operators of vertical prolongation type on 1{connection bundle,

Demonstratio Mathematica XXIII (1990), 161{173.

Kurek, J., On the natural operators of Bianchi type, Arch. Math (Brno) 27a (1991), 25{29.

Kurek, J., On gauge-natural operators of curvature type on pairs of connections, to appear in

Matematica Slovaca.

Kurek, J., Natural transformations of higher order cotangent functors, to appear in Annales

Polonici Matematici.

Kurek, J., Natural a_nors on higher order cotangent bundles, to appear in Annales UMCS

Lublin.

Lapt_ev, G. F., Structure equations of principal _bre bundles, Russian, Trudy Geometr. Sem.,

II, Moscow, 1969, pp. 161-178.

Lecomte, P. B. A., Sur la suite exacte canonique associ_ee _a un _br_e principal, Bull. Soc. Math.

France 113 (1985), 259{271.

Lecomte, P. B. A., Applications of the cohomology of graded Lie algebras to formal deformations

of Lie algebras, Letters in Math. Physics 13 (1987), 157{166.

Lecomte, P., Accessibilit_e et gouvernabilit_e en theorie du controle, Notes, Universit_e de Li_ege.

Lecomte, P.; Michor, P. W.; Schicketanz, H., The multigraded Nijenhuis-Richardson Algebra,

its universal property and application, J. Pure Applied Algebra 77 (1992), 87{102.

Leicher, H., Natural operations on covariant tensor _elds, J. Di_erential Geometry 8 (1973),

117{123.

Leites, D. A., Formulas for characters of irreducible _nite dimensional representations of Lie

superalgebras, (Russian), Funct. Anal. and its Appl. 14 No 2 (1980), 35{38.

Libermann, P., Sur la g_eom_etrie des prolongements des espaces _br_es vectoriels, Ann. Inst.

Fourier, Grenoble 14 (1964), 145{172.

Libermann, P., Sur les prolongements des _br_es principaux et des groupoides di__erentiables

banachiques, Analyse global, S_em. Math. Sup_erieures, No. 42 (_Et_e, 1969), Presses Univ.

Montreal (1971), 7{108.

Libermann, P., Parall_elismes, J.Di_erential Geometry 8 (1973), 511{539.

Lichnerowicz, A., Global theory of connections and holonomy groups, Nordho_ International

Publshing, 1976.

Lubczonok, G., On the reduction theorems, Ann. Polon. Math. 26 (1972), 125{133.

Luciano, O. O., Categories of multiplicative functors and Weil's in_nitely near points, Nagoya

Math. J. 109 (1988), 69{89.

Luna, D., Fonctions di__erentiables invariantes sous l'operation d'un groupe r_eductif, Ann.

Inst. Fourier, Grenoble 26 (1976), 33{49.

Malgrange, B., Ideals of di_erentiable functions, Oxford University Press, 1966.

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., Some results on calculus of variations on jet spaces, Ann. Inst.

H. Poincar_e 39 (1) (1983), 29{43.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

424 References

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., New operators on jet spaces, Ann. Fac. Scien. Toulouse 2 (5)

(1983), 171-198.

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., Graded Lie algebras and connections on a _bred space, Journ.

Math. Pures et Appl. 83 (1984), 111{120.

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., Fibered spaces, Jet spaces and Connections for Field Theories,

Proceedings of the International Meeting on Geometry and Physics, Florence 1982,

Pitagora, Bologna, 1983.

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., On the geometric structure of gauge theories, J. Math. Phys.

26 (6) (1985), 1373{1379.

Mangiarotti, L.; Modugno, M., Connections and di_erential calculus on _bered manifolds.

Applications to _eld theory., preprint 1989.

Marathe, K.B.; Modugno, M., Polynomial connections on a_ne bundles, Preprint 1988.

Mauhart, M., Iterierte Lie Ableitungen und Integrabilitat, Diplomarbeit, Universitat Wien,

1990.

Mauhart, M.; Michor, P. W., Commutators of ows and _elds, to appear, Archivum Math.

(Brno) (1992).

Michor, P. W., Manifolds of di_erentiable mappings, Shiva, Orpington, 1980.

Michor, P. W., Manifolds of smooth mappings IV: Theorem of De Rham, Cahiers Top. Geo.

Di_. 24 (1983), 57{86.

Michor, P. W., Remarks on the Frolicher-Nijenhuis bracket, Proceedings of the Conference on

Di_erential Geometry and its Applications, Brno 1986, D. Reidel, 1987, pp. 197{220.

Michor, P. W., Remarks on the Schouten-Nijenhuis bracket, Supplemento ai Rendiconti del

Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Serie II 16 (1987), 207{215.

Michor, P. W., Gauge theory for di_eomorphism groups, Proceedings of the Conference on

Di_erential Geometric Methods in Theoretical Physics, Como 1987 (K. Bleuler, M.Werner,

eds.), Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988, pp. 345{371.

Michor, P. W., Graded derivations of the algebra of di_erential forms associated with a connection,

Di_erential Geometry, Proceedings, Peniscola 1988,, Springer Lecture Notes 1410,

1989a, pp. 249{261.

Michor, P. W., Knit products of graded Lie algebras and groups, Proceedings of the Winter

School on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1989, Suppl. Rendiconti Circolo Matematico di

Palermo, Ser. II 22 (1989b), 171{175.

Michor, P. W., The relation between systems and associated bundles, to appear, Annali di

Matematica (Firenze).

Michor, P. W., Gauge theory for _ber bundles, Monographs and Textbooks in Physical Sciences,

Vol. 19, Bibliopolis, Napoli, 1991.

Mikulski, W. M., Locally determined associated spaces, J. London Math. Soc. 32 (1985), 357{

364.

Mikulski, W. M., There exists a prolongation functor of in_nite order, _Casopis p_est. mat. 114

(1989), 57{59.

Mikulski, W. M., Natural transformations of Weil functors into bundle functors, Supplemento

di Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Serie II 22 (1989), 177{191.

Mikulski, W. M., Natural transformations transforming functions and vector _elds to functions

on some natural bundles, to appear.

Mikulski, W. M., Some natural operations on vector _elds, to appear.

Milnor, J., On manifolds homeomorphic to the 7-sphere, Annals of Math. 64 (1956), 399{405.

Milnor, J. W.; Stashe_ J. D., Characteristic classes, Annals of Mathematics Studies 76, Princeton,

1974.

Modugno, M., An introduction to systems of connections, Sem Ist. Matem. Appl. Firenze 7

(1986), 1{76.

Modugno, M., Systems of vector valued forms on a _bred manifold and applications to gauge

theories,, Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1251, Springer-Verlag, 1987, pp. 238{264.

Modugno, M., New results on the theory of connections: systems, overconnections and prolongations,

Di_erential Geometry and Its Applications, Proceedings, D. Reidel Publishing

Company, 1987, pp. 243{269.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

References 425

Modugno, M., Systems of connections and invariant Lagrangians, Di_erential geometric methods

in theoretical physics, Proc. XV. Conf. Clausthal 1986, World Scienti_c Publishing,

Singapore, 1987.

Modugno, M., Linear overconnections, Proceedings Journ_ees Relat. Toulouse, 1988, pp. 155{

170.

Modugno, M., Jet involution and prolongation of connections, _Casopis P_est. Mat. 114 (1989),

356{365.

Modugno, M., Non linear connections, Ann. de Physique, Colloque no 1, suppl_ement au no 6

14 (1989), 143{147.

Modugno, M., Torsion and Ricci tensor for non-linear connections, Diferential Geometry and

Its Applications 1 (1991), 177{192.

Modugno, M.; Ragionieri, R; Stefani, G., Di_erential pseudoconnections and _eld theories,

Ann. Inst. H. Poincar_e 34 (4) (1981), 465{493.

Modugno, M.; Stefani, G., Some results on second tangent and cotangent spaces, Quaderni

dell' Instituto di Matematica dell' Universit_a di Lecce Q. 16 (1978).

Moerdijk, I.; Reyes G. E., Rings of smooth functions and their localizations, I, J. Algebra 99

(1986), 324-336.

Monterde, J.; Montesinos, A., Integral curves of derivations, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 6

(1988), 177-189.

Montgomery, D.; Zippin, L., Transformation groups, J. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1955.

Morimoto, A., Prolongations of geometric structures, Math. Inst. Nagoya University, Chikusa-

Ku, Nagoya, Japan, 1969.

Morimoto, A., Prolongations of connections to bundles of in_nitely near points, J. Di_. Geo.

11 (1976), 479{498.

Morrow, J., The denseness of complete Riemannian metrics, J. Di_. Geo. 4 (1970), 225{226.

Nagata, J., Modern dimension theory, North Holland, 1965.

Naymark, M. A., Group representation theory, (Russian), Nauka, Moscow, 76.

Newlander, A.; Nirenberg, L., Complex analytic coordinates in almost complex manifolds,

Ann. of Math. 65 (1957), 391{404.

Nijenhuis, A., Jacobi-type identities for bilinear di_erential concomitants of certain tensor

_elds I, Indagationes Math. 17 (1955), 390{403.

Nijenhuis, A., Geometric aspects of formal di_erential operations on tensor _elds, Proc. Internat.

Congress Math. (Edinburgh, 1958), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1960,

pp. 463{469.

Nijenhuis, A., Natural bundles and their general properties, in Di_erential Geometry in Honor

of K. Yano, Kinokuniya, Tokyo, 1972, pp. 317{334.

Nijenhuis, A., Invariant di_erentiation techniques, Geometrodynamics Proceedings, World

Scienti_c Publishing Co., 1985, pp. 249{266.

Nijenhuis, A.; Richardson, R., Deformation of Lie algebra structures, J. Math. Mech. 17

(1967), 89{105.

Nomizu, K.; Ozeki, H., The existence of complete Riemannian metrics, Proc. AMS 12 (1961),

889{891.

Okassa, E., Prolongements des champs de vecteurs _a des vari_et_es de points proches, CRAS

Paris, s_erie I 300 (1985), 173{176.

Okassa, E., Prolongement des champs de vecteurs _a des vari_et_es de points proches, Ann. Fac.

Sci. Toulouse Math. 8 (1986-1987), 349{366.

Oproiu, V., Connections on the semiholonomic frame bundle of the second order, Revue

Roumaine Mat. Pures et Appliq. XIV (1969), 661{672.

_rsted, B., Conformally invariant di_erential equations and projective geometry, J. Funct.

Anal. 44 (1981), 1{23.

Palais, R. S., A global formulation of the Lie theory of transformation groups, Mem. AMS 22

(1957).

Palais, R., Natural operations on di_erential forms, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 92 (1959), 125{

141.

Palais, R. S.; Terng, C. L., Natural bundles have _nite order, Topology 16 (1977), 271{277.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

426 References

Peetre, J., Recti_cations _a l'article \Une caract_erisation abstraite des op_erateurs di__erentiels",

Math. Scand. 8 (1960), 116{120.

Pogoda, Z., The regularity condition for some natural functors, Supplemento ai Rendiconti

del Circolo Matematico di palermo, Serie II 14 (1987), 105{115.

Pohl, F.W., Di_erential geometry of higher order, Topology 1 (1962), 169{211.

Pohl, F. W., Connections in di_erential geometry of higher order, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.

125 (1966), 310{325.

Pradines, J., Repr_esentation des jets non holonomes par des morphismes vectoriels doubles

sond_es, CRAS, Paris, s_erie A 278 (1974), 1523{1526.

Pradines, J., Fibr_es vectoriels doubles sym_etriques et jets holonomes d'ordre 2, CRAS, Paris,

s_erie A 278 (1974), 1557{1560.

Que, N., Du prolongements des espaces _br_es et des structures in_nit_esimales, Ann. Inst.

Fourier, Grenoble 17 (1967), 157{223.

Que, N., Sur l'espace de prolongement di__erentiable, J. Di_erential Geometry 2 (1968), 33{40.

Quinn, F., Ends III, J. Di_. Geo. 17 (1982), 503{521.

Reinhart, B. L., Di_erential Geometry of Foliations (The Fundamental Integrability Problem),

Ergebnisse d. Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, Bel. 99, 2. Folge, Springer-Verlag, 1983.

Rudakov, A. N., Irreducible representations of in_nite dimensional Lie algebras of Cartan

type, (Russian), Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat. 38 (1974), 835{866.

Rudakov, A. N., Irreducible representations of in_nite dimensional Lie algebras of types S

and H, (Russian), Izv. AN SSSR, Ser. Mat. 39 (1975), 496{511.

Salvioli, S., On the theory of geometric objects, J. Di_erential Geometry 7 (1972), 257{278.

Sattinger; Weaver, Lie groups and algebras with applications to physics, geometry, and mechanics,

Applied Mathematical Sciences, Springer-Verlag, 1986.

Saunders, D. J., The Geometry of Jet Bundles, London Mathematical Society Lecture Notes

Series 142, Cambridge, 1989.

Schicketanz H., On derivations and cohomology of the Lie algebra of vector valued forms

related to a smooth manifold, Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. Li_ege 57,6 (1988), 599-617.

Schouten, J. A.,  Uber Di_erentialkonkomitanten zweier kontravarianten Grossen, Indagationes

Math. 2 (1940), 449{452.

Schouten, J. A., Ricci calculus, Berlin-Gottingen, 1954.

Sekizawa, M., Natural transformations of a_ne connections on manifolds to metrics on cotangent

bundles, Supplemento ai Rendiconti del Circolo Matematico di Palermo, Serie II 16

(1987), 101{108.

Sekizawa, M., Natural transformations of vector _elds on manifolds to vector _elds on tangent

bundles, Tsukuba J. Math. 12 (1988), 115{128.

Sekizawa, M., Natural transformations of symmetric a_ne connections on manifolds to metrics

on linear frame bundle: a classi_cation, Mh. Math. 105 (1988), 229{243.

Shmelev, G. S., Di_erential H(2n;m)-invariant operators and indecomposable osp(2; 2n)-

representations, Russian, Funktsional. Anal. i Prilozh. 17 (1983), 94-95.

Slov_ak, J., Smooth structures on _bre jet spaces, Czech. Math. J. 36 (1986), 358{375.

Slov_ak, J., Prolongations of connections and sprays with respect to Weil functors, Proceedings

of the Winter School on Geometry and Physics, Srn__ 1986, Suppl. Rendiconti Circolo Mat.

Palermo, Serie II 14 (1987).

Slov_ak, J., On the _nite order of some operators, Proceedings of the Conference on Di_erential

Geometry and its Applications, Communications, Brno 1986, D. Reidel, 1987, pp. 283{294.

Slov_ak, J., Peetre theorem for nonlinear operators, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 6 (1988), 273{

283.

Slov_ak, J., On natural connections on Riemannian Manifolds, Comment. Math. Univ. Carolinae

30 (1989), 389{393.

Slov_ak, J., Action of jet groups on manifolds, Proceeding of Conference on Di_erential Geometry

and Applications, Brno 1989, World Scienti_c, Singapure, 1990, pp. 178{186.

Slov_ak, J., Bundle functors on _bred manifolds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 9 (1991), 129-143.

Slov_ak, J., On invariant operations on a manifold with connection or metric, to appear in J.

Di_. Geom. (1992).

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

References 427

Slov_ak, J., Invariant operators on pseudo-Riemannian manifolds, to appear in Comment.

Math. Univ. Carolinae 33 (1992).

Shtern, A. I.; Zhelobenko, D. P., Representations of Lie groups, Russian, Nauka, Moscow, 83.

Stefan, P., Accessible sets, orbits and foliations with singularities, Proc. London Math. Soc.

29 (1974), 699{713.

Stredder, P., Natural di_erential operators on Riemannian manifolds and representations of

the orthogonal and special orthogonal group, J. Di_. Geom. 10 (1975), 647{660.

Sussman, H. J., Orbits of families of vector _elds and integrability of distributions, Trans.

AMS 180 (1973), 171-188.

Szybiak, A., Covariant di_erentiation of geometric objects, Dissertationes Mathematicae, LVI,

Warszawa (1967).

Terng C. L., Natural vector bundles and natural di_erential operators, American J. of Math.

100 (1978), 775{828.

Tong, Van Duc, Sur la g_eom_etrie di__erentielle des _br_es vectoriels, K_odai Math. Sem. Rep.

26 (1975), 349{408.

Tougeron, J. C., Id_eaux de fonctions di__erentiables, Ergebnisse 71, Springer-Verlag, 1972.

Trautman, A., Invariance of Lagrangian systems, General Relativity, Papers in honour of J.

L. Synge, Clarenden Press, Oxford, 1972, pp. 85{99.

Tulczyjew, W.M., Hamiltonian Systems, Lagrangian systems and the Legendre transformation,

Symp. Math. 14, Roma (1974), 247{258.

van Strien, S., Unicity of the Lie product, Comp. Math. 40 (1980), 79{85.

Varadarajan, V.S., Lie groups, Lie algebras, and their representations, 2-nd edition, Springer-

Verlag, New York, 1984.

Veblen, O., Di_erential invariants and geometry, Atti del Congr. Int. Mat., Bologna, 1928.

Virsik, J., A generalized point of view to higher order connections on _bre bundles, Czechoslovak

Math. J. 19 (1969), 110{142.

Weil, Andr_e, Th_eorie des points proches sur les vari_et_es di_erentielles, Colloque de topologie

et g_eom_etrie di__erentielle, Strasbourg, 1953, pp. 111{117.

Weyl, H., The classical groups, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1946.

White, J. E., The methods of iterated tangents with applications to local Riemannian geometry,

Pitman Press, 1982.

Whitney, H., Analytic extensions of di_erentiable functions de_ned on closed sets, Trans. Am.

Math. Soc. 36 (1934), 63{89.

Whitney, H., The sel_ntersections of a smooth n-manifold in 2n-space, Annals of Math. 45

(1944), 220{293.

Wolf, J. A., Spaces of constant curvature, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1967.

Wunsch, V., On conformally invariant di_erential operators, Math. Nachr. 129 (1986), 269{

281.

Yamabe, H., On an arcwise connected subgroup of a Lie group, Osaka Math. J. 2 (1950),

13-14.

Yano, K.; Ishihara, S., Tangent and cotangent bundles, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1973.

Yuen, D. C., Higher order frames and linear connections, Cahiers Topol. G_eom. Di_. 12

(1971), 333{371.

Zajtz, A., A classi_cation of natural bundles, Colloquia Matematica Societatis J_anos Bolyai,

46, Topics in Di_erential Geometry,, Debrecen (Hungary), 1984, pp. 1333{1357.

Zajtz. A., The sharp upper bound on the order of natural bundles of given dimensions, Bull.

Soc. Math. Belg. Ser B39 (1987), 347{357.

Zajtz, A., Geometric objects with _nitely determined germs, Ann. Polon. Math. 49 (1988),

157{168.

Zajtz, A., On the order of natural operators and liftings, Ann. Polon. Math. 49 (1988), 169{

178.

Zajtz, A., Foundations of di_erential geometry of natural bundles, to appear.

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

428 List of symbols

List of symbols

1j the multi index with j-th component one and all others zero, 13.2

_: Jr(M;N) ! M the source mapping of jets, 12.2

_ : Jr(M;N) ! N the target mapping of jets, 12.2

B: FM!Mf the base functor, 2.20

C1E, also C1(E ! M) the space of smooth sections of a _ber bundle

C1(M;N) the space of smooth maps of M into N

C1

x (M;N) the space of germs at x 2 M, 1.4

conja : G ! G the conjugation in a Lie group G by a 2 G, 4.24

d usually the exterior derivative, 7.8

D the algebra of dual numbers, 37.1

Dr

n = Jr

0 (Rn;R) the algebra of r-jets of functions, 40.5

(E; p;M; S), also simply E usually a _ber bundle with total space E, base M,

and standard _ber S, 9.1

F usually the ow operator of a natural bundle F, 6.19, 42.1

FlXt

, also Fl(t;X) the ow of a vector _eld X, 3.7

FM the category of _bered manifolds and _ber respecting mappings, 2.20

FMm the category of _bered manifolds with m-dimensional bases and _ber

respecting mappings with local di_eomorphisms as base maps, 12.16

FMm;n the category of _bered manifolds with m-dimensional bases and ndimensional

_bers and locally invertible _ber respecting mappings,

17.1

FM_ the category of star bundles, 41.1

G usually a general Lie group with multiplication _ : G _ G ! G, left

translation _, and right translation _

g the Lie algebra of a Lie group G

Gr

m the jet group (di_erential group) of order r in dimension m, 12.6

Gr

m;n the jet group of order r of the category FMm;n, 18.8

GL(n) the general linear group in dimension n with real coe_cients, 4.30

GL(Rn;E) the linear frame bundle of a vector bundle E, 10.11

Ik short for the k _ k-identity matrix IdRk

invJr(M;N) the bundle of invertible r-jets of M into N, 12.3

JrE the bundle of r-jets of local sections of a _ber bundle E ! M, 12.16

Jr(M;N) the bundle of r-jets of smooth functions from M to N, 12.2

jrf(x), also jrx

f the r-jet of a mapping f at x, 12.2

Krn

the functor of (n; r)-contact elements, 12.15

L the Lie derivative, 6.15, 47.4

` : G _ S ! S usually a left action of a Lie group

L(V;W) the space of all linear maps of vector space V into a vector space W

LP = P[g; Ad] the adjoint bundle of principal bundle P(M;G), 17.6

Lr the r-th order skeleton of the category Mf, 12.6

M usually a (base) manifold

Mf the category of manifolds and smooth mappings, 1.2

Mfm the category of m-dimensional manifolds and local di_eomorphisms,

6.14

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

Author index 429

N natural numbers

k(M) the space of k-forms on a manifold M, 7.4

k(M;E) the space of E-valued k-forms, 7.11

P(M;G), also (P; p;M;G) a principal _ber bundle with structure group G,

10.6

P[S; `], also P[S] the associated bundle to a principal bundle P(M;G) for the

action ` : G _ S ! S, 10.7

PB the category of principal _ber bundles, 10.6

PBm the category of principal bundles over m-dimensional manifolds and of

PB-morphisms covering local di_eomorphisms, 17.4

PB(G) the category of principal G-bundles, 10.6

PBm(G) the category of principal G-bundles over m-dimensional manifolds

and local isomorphisms, 15.1

PrM = invJr

0 (RdimM;M) the r-th order frame bundle of a manifold M, 12.12

_r

s : Jr(M;N) ! Js(M;N) projection of r-jets into s-jets, s _ r, 12.2

QP the connection bundle of a principal bundle P, 17.4

Q_P1M the bundle of torsion free linear connections, 25.3

R real numbers

r : P _ G ! P usually a right action, in particular the principal right action of

a principal bundle

TM the tangent bundle of a manifold M with projection _M : TM ! M

1.7

T(r)M = Jr(M;R)_

0 the r-order tangent bundle, 12.14

Tr

k = Jr

0 (Rk; ) the functor of (k; r)-velocities, 12.8

TA the Weil functor corresponding to the Weil algebra A, 35.11

tx usually the translation Rm ! Rm, y 7! y + x

VB the category of vector bundles, 6.3

Wrm

G the (m; r)-principal prolongation of a Lie group G, 15.2

WrP the r-th principal prolongation of a principal bundle P, 15.3

X(M) the set of all vector _elds on a manifold M, 3.1

Y ! M usually a _bered manifold

Z integers

Author index

Albert, 48

Atiyah, 265, 266, 267, 295

Baston, 281, 293, 294, 295

Bernstein, 292

Boe, 294

Boerner, 131, 281

Boman, 172

Bott, 265, 266, 267, 295

Branson, 293, 295

Brocker, 10

Cahen, 210

Cap, 252, 254, 393, 416

Carrell, 133, 216, 218

Chrastina, 181, 210

Cohen, 11

Collingwood, 294

de Le_on, 356

De Wilde, 210, 252

Dekr_et, 257

Dieudonn_e, 9, 17, 133, 216, 218

Donaldson, 5

Doupovec, 229, 359, 375

Eastwood, 281, 293, 294

Eck, 297, 328, 400, 416

430 Author index

Ehresmann, 117, 166, 167, 169, 265

Eilenberg, 169

Epstein, 116, 168, 188, 210, 295

Fegan, 294

Feigin, 292

Feng Luo, 5

Freedman, 4, 5

Frolicher, 59, 75, 79, 396

Fuks, 292

Gancarzewicz, 345, 357, 416

Gheorghiev, 167

Gilkey, 275, 295

Goldschmidt, 340

Gompf, 5

Graham, 295

Greub, 5, 81, 115

Grozman, 291

Gurevich, 215

Gutt, 210

Halperin, 5, 81, 115

Hilgert, 48

Hirsch, 10, 11, 82, 180, 314, 330

Hochschild, 201

Jacobson, 42

Jany_ska, 166, 248, 357, 393

Joris, 12

Janich, 10

Kainz, 297, 328

Kirillov, 281, 282, 289, 292, 393

Kobak, 363

Kobayashi, 100, 107, 162, 166, 167, 403

Kock, 349

Kowalski, 277, 295

Kriegl, 59, 79, 310

Krupka, 248, 252, 357, 360

Kurek, 232, 265, 402

Laptev, 167

Lecomte, 48, 252, 404

Leites, 292

Libermann, 115, 167

Lichnerowicz, 235, 243

Lubczonok, 248

Luciano, 297, 328

Luna, 224

Malgrange, 178

Mangiarotti, 75, 340

Mauhart, 48, 60

Mikol_a_sov_a, 252

Mikulski, 210, 211, 343, 349, 360

Milnor, 4, 301

Modugno, 227, 257, 262, 263, 295, 340, 393

Molino, 48

Montgomery, 43, 45, 310

Morimoto, 297, 355

Morrow, 81

Nagata, 5, 81

Naymark, 130, 131, 285

Neeb, 48

Newlander, 75

Nijenhuis, 68, 75, 116, 138, 210, 255

Nirenberg, 75

Nomizu, 81, 100, 107, 162, 166, 403

Ozeki, 81

Palais, 83, 116, 138, 168, 210, 222, 282

Patodi, 265, 266, 267, 295

Peetre, 176, 210

Pohl, 363

Pradines, 334

Quinn, 4

Radziszewski, 229, 248

Reinhart, 166

Rice, 294

Richardson, 68

Rodriguez, 356

Rudakov, 286, 288

Sattinger, 48

Saunders, 393

Schouten, 248, 255

Sekizava, 277, 295, 357

Shmelev, 292

Shtern, 285

Stashe_, 301

Stefan, 48

Stefani, 227

Sternberg, 340

Stredder, 276, 295

Sussman, 48

Terng, 116, 128, 136, 138, 166, 168, 210, 282,

286

Thurston, 116, 168, 188, 210,

Tougeron, 178

Trautman, 392

Tulczyjew, 227

van Strien, 252

Vanstone, 5, 81, 115

Varadarajan, 42

Virsik, 167

Vosmansk_a, 265, 295, 349

Weaver, 48

Weil, 296, 301, 328

Weyl, 265

White, 393

Whitney, 10, 178

Wolf, 115

Yamabe, 43

Zajtz, 210, 375

Zhelobenko, 285

Zippin, 43, 45, 310

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993

Index 431

Index

A

A-admissible, 341

A-velocity, 306

absolute di_erential, 164

absolute di_erential along X, 163, 164

absolute operator, 351

action of a category, 147

adjoint representation, 38

admissible category, 171

a_ne bundle, 60

a_ne bundle functor on Mfm, 142

algebraic bracket, 68

algebraic description of Weil functors, 305

almost complex structure, 75

almost Whitney-extendible, 184

anholonomic, 16

associated bundle, 90

associated map, 171, 174

associated map to the k-th order operator A,

143

associated maps of the bundle functor F, 139

atlas, 4

B

base, 11, 50

base extending, 173

base functor B: FM!Mf, 15

Bianchi identity, 78

Borel subalgebra, 285

bundle functor on Mfm, 138

bundle functor on C, 170

bundle functor on the category Mf, 146

C

C-connection, 365

C-_eld, 175, 365

Cr-map, 173

canonical ip mapping, 55, 319

canonical form on P1M, 155

canonical lift, 59

Cartan subalgebra, 285

category over manifolds, 169

_Cech cohomology set, 51

center, 44

centralizer, 44

chart, 4

chart description of Weil functors, 301

Chern forms, 269

Christo_el forms, 79

classical complex Lie groups, 32

classifying spaces, 94

closed form, 66

cocurvature, 73

cocycle condition, 51, 77

cocycle of transition functions, 51, 77

cohomologous, 51, 87

cohomology classes, 51

complete connection, 81

complete vector _eld, 19

complete ow, 19

completely reducible, 131

conformal, 271

conformal weight, 293

conjugation, 38

connection, 73, 77

connection form, Lie algebra valued, 100

connection morphism, 364

connection, general, 77, 158

connector, 110, 326

contact (n; r)-element, 124

cotangent bundle, 61

covariant derivative, 110, 326

covariant exterior derivative, 103, 111

covelocities, 120

curvature, 73, 111

curvature form, Lie algebra-valued, 100

D

derivation, 6, 322

derivation, graded, 67

derived group, 130

descending central sequence, 130

di_eomorphic, 5

di_eomorphism, 5

di_erential, 8

di_erential form, 62

di_erential group, 119

distinguished chart, 27

distribution, 24

divergence, 131

dual natural vector bundles, 142

dual numbers, 318

E

E-valued k-form, 67, 403

e_ective action, 44

Ehresmann connection, 81

elementary invariant, 265

elementary invariant tensors of degree r, 214

embedding, 9

Euler morphism, 387

evolution operator, 29

exact form, 66

expansion, 321

expansion property, 321

exponential mapping, 36

432 Index

exterior derivative, 65

exterior form, 62

F

f-dependent, 73

f-related, 19, 73

F-metric, 278

_ber, 50

_ber bundle, 76

_ber bundle atlas, 77

_ber chart, 77

_ber over x 2 N, 15

_ber r-jet at x, 395

_bered manifold, 11

_bered product, 15

_nite order r, 139

_rst polarization, 219

ow line, 17

ow prolongation, 59

ow-natural transformation, 336, 338

ow of a vector _eld, 18

foliation, 25

formal curvature map, 234

formally real algebra, 297

frame bundle, 122

frame _eld, 16, 52

frame form, 95, 154, 156

free action, 44

Frolicher-Nijenhuis bracket, 69

fundamental vector _eld, 46

G

G-atlas, 86

G-bundle, 86

G-bundle structure, 86

G-equivariant, 47

G-module, 131

g-module homomorphism, 131

gauge natural bundle, 395

gauge natural operator, 398

gauge transformations, 95

general connection, 77, 158

general linear group, 30

general Ricci identity, 235

generalized Chern-Weil forms, 403

generalized covariant derivative, 378

generalized covariant di_erential, 378

generalized invariant tensor, 230

generalized invariant tensor theorem, 230

generalized Lie derivative, 376

germ of f at x, 6

global ow, 19

grading, 128

Grassmann manifold, 88

H

higher order connections, 160

highest weight vector, 285

holonomic frame _eld, 16

holonomous, 61

holonomy group, 82, 106

holonomy Lie algebra, 82

homogeneous degree, 131

homogeneous function theorem, 213

homogeneous in the order, 284

homogeneous space, 45

homomorphism of G-bundles, 92

homomorphism over _ of principal bundles, 89

horizontal bundle, 78

horizontal di_erential forms, 103

horizontal foliation, 79

horizontal lift, 78, 278

horizontal projection, 78

horizontal space, 73

horizontal vector, 78

I

I-equivalent, 306

ideal, 43

idealisator of a module, 298

idealizer, 44

immersed submanifold, 12

immersion, 11

induced action, 172

induced connection, 107, 108

in_nite jet, 125

in_nite jet prolongation J1Y of Y , 126

in_nitesimal automorphism, 26

in_nitesimally admissible, 170

in_nitesimally regular, 365

initial submanifold, 12

inner automorphism, 38

insertion operator, 63

integrable distribution, 25

integral curve, 17

integral manifold, 24

invariant tensor of degree r, 214

invariant tensor theorem, 214

invariant subspace, 131

involution, 55

involutive distribution, 28

irreducible principle connection, 107

irreducible representation, 131

J

jet, 117

jet group, 119

jet of order 1, 125

jet prolongation, 117

K

k-admissible domain, 176

k-form, 62

Index 433

L

Lagrangian, 387

leaf, 25

left action, 44

left invariant, 33

left logarithmic derivative, 39

Lie algebra, 17

Lie bracket of vector _elds, 17, 325

Lie derivative, 20, 57, 63, 69

Lie group, 30

Lie subgroup, 41

linear connection, 109, 110

linear frame bundle, 94

linear vector _eld, 379

Liouville vector _eld, 257

local category, 169

local di_eomorphism, 5

local isomorphism, 170

local operator, 143

local order, 205

local skeleton, 170

local trivialization, 77

local vector _eld, 16

localization of A over U, 169

locally at category, 185

locally homogeneous, 170

locally non-constant, 179

M

Maurer-Cartan form, 39, 79

maximal integral manifold, 24

method of di_erential equations, 245

mixed curvature, 232

modi_ed curvature operator, 402

morphism operator, 173

morphism of _bered manifolds, 15

multihomogeneous component, 218

multiindex, 118

multilinear version of Peetre theorem, 179

multipolarization, 219

N

natural a_ne bundle, 142

natural bilinear concomitants, 75

natural bundle, 138

natural operator, 143, 174

natural transformation, 58

natural vector bundle, 56, 141

Nijenhuis tensor, 75

Nijenhuis-Richardson bracket, 68

nilpotent, 130

nonlinear Peetre theorem, 179

normalizer, 44

O

object of type _, 170

one parameter subgroup, 35

orbit, 44

order (s; r), 401

orthogonal group, 31

orthonormal frame bundle, 94

P

plaque, 27

point property, 330, 335

pointed local skeleton, 170

polarization technique, 218

polynomial map, 218

Pontryagin forms, 270

principal bundle atlas, 87

principal connection, 100, 159

principal _ber bundle, 87

principal _ber bundle homomorphism, 89

principal prolongations of Lie groups, 150

principal prolongations of principal bundles,

150

principal right action, 87

product of manifolds, 10

product preserving functor, 308

pseudo tensorial forms of type `, 154

pullback, 78

pullback vector bundle, 53

pure manifold, 4

Q

quaternionic unitary group, 33

quaternionically linear, 33

quaternionically unitary, 33

R

r-th jet group (or the r-th di_erential group)

of type _, 171

r-th order curvature equations, 235

r-th order curvature subspace, 236

r-th order frame bundle of A, 171

r-th order Ricci equations, 240

r-th order Ricci subspace, 240

r-th order skeleton of C, 171

r-th order tangent vector, 123

reduction of the structure group, 90

regular functor, 171

regular operator, 143

representation, 38, 131

restricted holonomy group, 82, 106

restricted Lie derivative, 377

Riemannian metric , 94

right action, 44

right invariant, 34

right logarithmic derivative, 38

roots, 285

S

Sasaki lift, 278

second order di_erential equation, 257

434 Index

second semiholonomic prolongation of Y , 262

section, 50

semidirect product, 48

semidirect product of an algebra and a

module, 298

singular foliation, 25

singular vector, 283

smooth distribution, 24

smooth functor, 53

smooth partition of unity, 5

smooth splitting property, 171

solvable, 130

source, 117

special linear group, 31

special orthogonal group, 31

special unitary group, 32

sphere, 9

spray, 257

stable distribution, 26

standard _ber, 49, 77, 172

standard _ber of the bundle functor F, 139

star bundle functor, 346

stereographic atlas, 9

Stiefel manifold, 89

Study numbers, 318

submanifold, 9

submanifold chart, 9

submersion, 11

support, 5, 50, 176

support of a vector _eld, 19

symplectic group, 31

system of standard _bers of the bundle

functor, 147

T

tangent bundle, 8

tangent space of M at x, 7

tangent vector, 6

target, 117

tensor evaluation theorem, 224

tensor _eld, 59, 61

tensorial forms of type `, 154

time dependent vector _eld, 29

topological manifold, 4

torsion form, 155

torsion tensor, 155

torsion-free, 155

total polarization of f, 219

total space, 11, 50, 77

transgression, 270

transition function, 49, 77

transitive action, 44

transversal mapping, 14

typical _ber, 49

U

underlying manifold, 169

unitary group, 32

universal vector bundle, 97

V

vector bundle, 50

vector bundle atlas, 50

vector bundle chart, 49

vector bundle functor on Mfm, 141

vector bundle functor, 56

vector bundle homomorphism, 50

vector bundle isomorphism, 50

vector _eld, 16

vector _eld __ dual to a linear vector _eld _,

380

vector _eld along f, 376

vector sub bundle, 52

vector valued di_erential form, 68

velocities of order r and dimension m, 120

vertical bundle, 55, 77, 98

vertical lift, 55, 278, 319

vertical projection, 55, 78

vertical prolongation, 255

vertical space, 73

vertical Weil bundle, 336

W

W-extendible, 178, 205

weakly local functor, 313

weight, 271, 285

Weil algebra, 298

Whitney extension theorem, 178

Whitney-extendible, 178

width of a Weil algebra, 299

Z

zero section, 50

zero set, 5

Electronic edition of: Natural Operations in Differential Geometry, Springer-Verlag, 1993__

 

Навигация