1.10. Constructions with straight-edge and compass.

Back

The Greeks understood that

integers and the rational numbers. They were surprised to find that the length of the

diagonal of a square of side 1, namely

2, is not rational. They thus realized that they needed

to extend their number system. They then hoped that the constructible numbers would

suffice. Suppose we are given a length, which we call 1, a straight-edge, and a compass (device

for drawing circles). A number (better a length) is constructible if it can be constructed by

forming successive intersections of

lines drawn through two points already constructed, and

circles with centre a point already constructed and radius a constructed length.

This led them to three famous problems that they were unable to solve: is it possible

to duplicate the cube, trisect an angle, or square the circle by straight-edge and compass

constructions? Well see that the answer to all three is negative.

Let F be a subfield of R. The F-plane is F × F R × R. We make the following

definitions:

A line in the F-plane is a line through two points in the F-plane. Such a line is given by

an equation:

ax + by + c = 0, a, b, c F.

10 J.S. MILNE

A circle in the F-plane is a circle with centre an F-point and radius an element of F. Such

a circle is given by an equation:

(x a)2 + (y b)2 = c2, a, b, c F.

Lemma 1.24. Let L _= L_ be F-lines, and let C _= C_ be F-circles.

(a) L L_ = or consists of a single F-point.

(b) L C = or consists of one or two points in the F[

e]-plane, some e F.

(c) C C_ = or consists of one or two points in the F[

e]-plane, some e F.

Proof. The points in the intersection are found by solving the simultaneous equations,

and hence by solving (at worst) a quadratic equation with coefficients in F.

Lemma 1.25. (a) If c and d are constructible, then so also are c Ѓ} d, cd, and c

d (d _= 0).

(b) If c > 0 is constructible, then so also is

c.

Proof. First show that it is possible to construct a line perpendicular to a given line

through a given point, and then a line parallel to a given line through a given point. Hence

it is possible to construct a triangle similar to a given one on a side with given length. By

an astute choice of the triangles, one constructs cd and c1. For (b), draw a circle of radius

c+1

2 about ( c+1

2 , 0), and draw a vertical line through the point A = (1, 0) to meet the circle

at P. The length AP is

c. (For more details, see for example, Rotman, Galois Theory,

Appendix 3.)

Theorem 1.26. (a) The set of constructible numbers is a field.

(b) A number α is constructible if and only if it is contained in field of the form

Q[

a1, . . . ,

ar], ai Q[

a1, . . . ,

ai1].

Proof. (a) Immediate from (a) of Lemma 1.25.

(b) From (a) we know that the set of constructible numbers is a field containing Q, and

it follows from (a) and Lemma 1.25 that every number in Q[

a1, . . . ,

ar] is constructible.

Conversely, it follows from Lemma 1.24 that every constructible number is in a field of the

form Q[

a1, . . . ,

ar].

Now we can apply the (not quite elementary) result Proposition 1.10 to obtain:

Corollary 1.27. If α is constructible, then α is algebraic over Q, and [Q[α] : Q] is a

power of 2.

Proof. We know that [Q[α] : Q] divides [Q[

a1, . . . ,

ar] : Q] = 2r.

Corollary 1.28. It is impossible to duplicate the cube by straight-edge and compass

constructions.

Proof. The problem is to construct a cube with volume 2. This requires constructing

a root of the polynomial X3 2 = 0. But this polynomial is irreducible (by Eisensteins

criterion for example), and so [Q[ 3

2] : Q] = 3.

Corollary 1.29. In general, it is impossible to trisect an angle by straight-edge and

compass constructions.

FIELDS AND GALOIS THEORY 11

Proof. Knowing an angle is equivalent to knowing the cosine of the angle. Therefore, to

trisect 3α, we have to construct a solution to

cos 3α = 4cos3 α 3cos α.

For example, take 3α = 60;to construct α, we have to solve 8x3 6x 1 = 0, which is

irreducible.

Corollary 1.30. It is impossible to square the circle by straight-edge and compass constructions.

Proof. A square with the same area as a circle of radius r has side

πr. Since π is

transcendental, so also is

π.

We now consider another famous old problem, that of constructing a regular polygon.

Note that Xm 1 is not irreducible;in fact

Xm 1 = (X 1)(Xm1 + Xm2 + + 1).

Lemma 1.31. If p is prime then Xp1 + + 1 is irreducible; hence Q[e2πi/p] has degree

p 1 over Q.

Proof. Consider

f(X + 1) =

(X + 1)p 1

X

= Xp1 + + a2X2 + a1X + p,

with ai =

_ p

i+1

_

. Sincep|ai, i = 1, ..., p2, f(X+1) is irreducible by Eisensteins criterion.

In order to construct a regular p-gon, p an odd prime, we need to construct cos 2π

p . But

Q[e

2πi

p ] Q[cos 2π

p ] Q. The degree of Q[e

2πi

p ] over Q[cos 2π

p ] is 2the equation

α2 2cos

2π

p

α + 1 = 0, α= e

2πi

p ,

shows that it is 2, and it is not 1 because Q[e

2πi

p ] is not contained in R. Hence [Q[cos 2π

p ] :

Q] = p1

2 .

Thus if the regular p-gon is constructible, then (p 1)/2 = 2k some k (later, we shall see

a converse), which imples p = 2k+1 + 1. But 2r + 1 can only be a prime if r is a power of 2,

because otherwise r has an odd factor t, and for t odd,

Y t + 1 = (Y + 1)(Y t1 Y t2 + + 1).

Thus if the regular p-gon is constructible, then p = 22k + 1 for some k. Fermat conjectured

that all numbers of the form 22k + 1 are prime, and claimed to show that this is true for

k 5for this reason primes of this form are called Fermat primes. For 0 k 4, the

numbers p = 3, 5, 17, 257, 65537, are prime but Euler showed that 232 + 1 = 641 6700417,

and we dont know of any more Fermat primes.

Gauss showed that

cos

2π

17

= 1

16

+

1

16

17 +

1

16

 

34 2

17 +

1

8

_

17 + 3

17

 

34 2

17 2

 

34 + 2

17

when he was 18 years old. This success encouraged him to become a mathematician.

12 J.S. MILNE