Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
3.4 Basis of a subspace
We now come to the important concept of basis of a vector subspace.
DEFINITION 3.4.1 Vectors X1; : : : ;Xm belonging to a subspace S are
said to form a basis of S if
(a) Every vector in S is a linear combination of X1; : : : ;Xm;
(b) X1; : : : ;Xm are linearly independent.
Note that (a) is equivalent to the statement that S = hX1; : : : ;Xmi as we
automatically have hX1; : : : ;Xmi µ S. Also, in view of Remark 3.3.1 above,
(a) and (b) are equivalent to the statement that every vector in S is uniquely
expressible as a linear combination of X1; : : : ;Xm.
EXAMPLE 3.4.1 The unit vectors E1; : : : ;En form a basis for Fn.
62 CHAPTER 3. SUBSPACES
REMARK 3.4.1 The subspace f0g, consisting of the zero vector alone,
does not have a basis. For every vector in a linearly independent family
must necessarily be non{zero. (For example, if X1 = 0, then we have the
non{trivial linear relation
1X1 + 0X2 + ¢ ¢ ¢ + 0Xm = 0
and X1; : : : ;Xm would be linearly dependent.)
However if we exclude this case, every other subspace of F n has a basis:
THEOREM 3.4.1 A subspace of the form hX1; : : : ;Xmi, where at least
one of X1; : : : ;Xm is non{zero, has a basis Xc1 ; : : : ;Xcr , where 1 · c1 <
¢ ¢ ¢ < cr · m.
Proof. (The left{to{right algorithm). Let c1 be the least index k for which
Xk is non{zero. If c1 = m or if all the vectors Xk with k > c1 are linear
combinations of Xc1 , terminate the algorithm and let r = 1. Otherwise let
c2 be the least integer k > c1 such that Xk is not a linear combination of
Xc1 .
If c2 = m or if all the vectors Xk with k > c2 are linear combinations
of Xc1 and Xc2 , terminate the algorithm and let r = 2. Eventually the
algorithm will terminate at the r{th stage, either because cr = m, or because
all vectors Xk with k > cr are linear combinations of Xc1 ; : : : ;Xcr .
Then it is clear by the construction of Xc1 ; : : : ;Xcr , using Corollary 3.2.1
that
(a) hXc1 ; : : : ;Xcr i = hX1; : : : ;Xmi;
(b) the vectors Xc1 ; : : : ;Xcr are linearly independent by the left{to{right
test.
Consequently Xc1 ; : : : ;Xcr form a basis (called the left{to{right basis) for
the subspace hX1; : : : ;Xmi.
EXAMPLE 3.4.2 Let X and Y be linearly independent vectors in Rn.
Then the subspace h0; 2X; X; ¡Y; X +Y i has left{to{right basis consisting
of 2X; ¡Y .
A subspace S will in general have more than one basis. For example, any
permutation of the vectors in a basis will yield another basis. Given one
particular basis, one can determine all bases for S using a simple formula.
This is left as one of the problems at the end of this chapter.
We settle for the following important fact about bases:
3.4. BASIS OF A SUBSPACE 63
THEOREM 3.4.2 Any two bases for a subspace S must contain the same
number of elements.
Proof. For if X1; : : : ;Xr and Y1; : : : ; Ys are bases for S, then Y1; : : : ; Ys
form a linearly independent family in S = hX1; : : : ;Xri and hence s · r by
Theorem 3.3.2. Similarly r · s and hence r = s.
DEFINITION 3.4.2 This number is called the dimension of S and is
written dim S. Naturally we de¯ne dim f0g = 0.
It follows from Theorem 3.3.1 that for any subspace S of F n, we must have
dim S · n.
EXAMPLE 3.4.3 If E1; : : : ;En denote the n{dimensional unit vectors in
Fn, then dim hE1; : : : ;Eii = i for 1 · i · n.
The following result gives a useful way of exhibiting a basis.
THEOREM 3.4.3 A linearly independent family of m vectors in a sub-
space S, with dim S = m, must be a basis for S.
Proof. Let X1; : : : ;Xm be a linearly independent family of vectors in a
subspace S, where dim S = m. We have to show that every vector X 2 S is
expressible as a linear combination of X1; : : : ;Xm. We consider the following
family of vectors in S: X1; : : : ;Xm; X. This family contains m+1 elements
and is consequently linearly dependent by Theorem 3.3.2. Hence we have
x1X1 + ¢ ¢ ¢ + xmXm + xm+1X = 0; (3.1)
where not all of x1; : : : ; xm+1 are zero. Now if xm+1 = 0, we would have
x1X1 + ¢ ¢ ¢ + xmXm = 0;
with not all of x1; : : : ; xm zero, contradictiong the assumption that X1 : : : ;Xm
are linearly independent. Hence xm+1 6= 0 and we can use equation 3.1 to
express X as a linear combination of X1; : : : ;Xm:
X = ¡x1
xm+1
X1 + ¢ ¢ ¢ + ¡xm
xm+1
Xm:
64 CHAPTER 3. SUBSPACES
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Mathematics and art
- Finite element analysis
- Пчеловодство
- Fields and galois theory
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода