Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
6.4 SPEECH INTERFERENCE LEVEL
When exposed to two different sounds at the same time, the ear often
perceives only the louder sound. This phenomenon is called masking.
Masking results when the receptors in the cochlea are not available for
processing the particular sound information because they are being stimu-
Acoustic Criteria 235
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
lated by another signal. A noise signal that is spread out over a range of
frequencies results in more masking near the center frequency than a pure
tone at this frequency (Ehmer, 1959).
If the background noise level is excessive, a person may not be able to
carry on a conversation or understand a telephone conversation. Because
noise can interfere with speech intelligibility, this noise may disrupt work
where communication is necessary.
The consonants contain much of the information conveyed in speech.
The consonants are more easily masked by background noise than are the
vowels, because the sounds of the consonants are generally weaker than
those of the vowels. Nearly all of the information in speech is contained
in the frequency range fromabout 200Hz to 6000 Hz. The understanding of
communication (speech intelligibility) is influenced by the type of communication
(technical information is less readily transmitted than ‘‘small talk’’),
whether the two people ‘‘know’’ each other well or are relative strangers,
and the length of the conversation.
One measure of the effect of background noise on speech intelligibility
is the speech interference level (LSIL). The SIL is defined as the arithmetic
average of the sound pressure levels of the interfering noise in the four
octave bands—500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000Hz—rounded to the
nearest 1dB value (ANSI, 1986). These octave bands contain the frequencies
most important for communication. If an octave band analyzer is not available,
the SIL can be estimated from the A-weighted sound level reading by
the following expression:
LSIL _ LA _7dB (6-4)
The SIL values resulting in various levels of vocal effort for face-toface
communication may be estimated from the following expression
(Lazarus, 1987):
LSIL ј K _20log10r рr is in meters) (6-5)
The constant K is given in Table 6-3. The data are based on the assumption
that the information communicated is not familiar to the listener. For communication
between women and men, the data for women should be used.
Generally, the voice level used by the speaker will change as the background
noise level changes. In addition, the speaker may move closer to the
listener as the background noise level increases. The expected voice levels for
various SIL values of the background noise are given in Table 6-4.
The background noise SIL limits for telephone communication are
given in Table 6-5 (Peterson and Gross, 1972). For speakerphones, SIL
values of approximately 5 dB higher than those given in Table 6-5 may be
236 Chapter 6
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
tolerated, if the speakerphone is not located more than 1m (39 in) from the
person.
Example 6-2. In one area of an industrial plant, the octave band sound
pressure level spectrum is given in Table 6-6. Determine the maximum
distance between the speaker and listener (both males) for communication
in a normal voice.
The speech interference level is found by averaging the sound pressure
levels in the four octave bands, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, 2000 Hz, and 4000 Hz:
LSIL ј 1
4 р73ю69ю65ю59Ю ј 66:5dB!Use 67 dB
The distance between the people for conversation in a normal voice is given
by Eq. (6-5):
LSIL ј 67 ј 54_20 log10 r
r ј 10_р13Ю=р20Ю ј 0:224m ј 224mm р8:8 inЮ
Men would not typically carry on a ‘‘normal’’ conversation at a spacing of
only about 225mm or 83
4 in.
For conversation in a raised voice, the distance between the two people
would be as follows:
r ј 10р60_67Ю=20 ј 0:447m ј 447mm р17:6inЮ
Acoustic Criteria 237
TABLE 6-3 Background Speech Interference Levela Limits for Face-to-Face
Communication
Vocal Effort
K, dB
Women Men Comment
Normal voice 50 54 Communication is satisfactory for the
given vocal effort in this range
Raised voice 56 60
Loud voice 62 66
Very loud voice 67 71
Shouting 72 76 Communication is difficult
Maximum shouting 75 79 Communication without amplification
is impossible above this level
Limit for amplified speech 110 114 Vocal communication is impossible
above this level
aLSIL ј K _ 20 log10 r (meters)
Source: Lazarus (1987).
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
Even this distance is somewhat close for men to carry on a conversation
comfortably in a raised voice. For conversation in a loud voice, the distance
between the two people would be as follows:
r ј 10р66_67Ю=20 ј 0:891m р35:1 inЮ
This would represent a more comfortable distance between the people.
From Table 6-5, we observe that a telephone conversation would be
difficult for the SIL of 67 dB.
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Mathematics and art
- Fields and galois theory
- Пчеловодство
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода