Пресс-релиз популярных книг
.
Авторы: 111 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
Книги: 164 А Б В Г Д Е Ж З И Й К Л М Н О П Р С Т У Ф Х Ц Ч Ш Щ Э Ю Я
На сайте 111 авторов, 92 книг, 72 статей, 5913 глав.
7.1 SURFACE ABSORPTION COEFFICIENTS
7.1.1 Values for Surface Absorption Coe⁄cients
Sound-absorbing materials are used to reduce the sound levels in a room or
to reduce the reverberation, if either of these quantities are excessive. As will
be discussed in Sec. 7.3, surface absorption materials do not change the
sound coming directly from the source to the receiver. Instead, the surface
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
treatment affects sound that has been reflected at least one time from the
surfaces of the room. This sound is associated with the reverberant sound
field.
The surface absorption coefficient _ is defined as the ratio of the acoustic
energy absorbed by the surface to the acoustic energy striking the surface:
_ ј
Wabs
Win
(7-1)
The energy absorbed at the surface may be transmitted through the material
or may be dissipated within the material.
The surface absorption coefficient is generally a function of the
frequency of the incident sound wave. Some representative values of the
surface absorption coefficient for various interior surfaces are given in
Appendix D.
The effect of people and furniture in a space is given by the product of
the surface absorption coefficient and the area р_SЮ, because the surface area
of a person or chair is not always easy to determine. Values for this quantity
are also given in Appendix D.
7.1.2 Noise Reduction Coe⁄cient
In some cases, it is desirable to have a single-number rating to use in comparing
the acoustic absorbing qualities of different materials. It is generally
better to have available the spectrum of values (surface absorption coefficient
as a function of frequency) for design purposes, however. The noise
reduction coefficient (NRC) may be used for rough comparison of acoustic
absorbing characteristics.
The noise reduction coefficient is defined as the average of the surface
absorption coefficients in the 250 Hz, 500 Hz, 1000 Hz, and 2000 Hz octave
bands. By convention, the NRC values are always rounded off to the nearest
0.05. For example, let us determine the NRC value for 1-inch thick fiberglass
formboard. Using the values from Appendix D, we find the following:
NRC ј р1=4Юр0:34 ю 0:79 ю 0:99 ю 0:93Ю ј 0:7625
After rounding this value off to the nearest 0.05, we find the noise reduction
coefficient for the formboard:
NRC ј 0:75
The value of NRC-0.75 gives a rough measure of the effectiveness of
the insulation in abosrbing sound; however, there is no indication that the
material is actually more effective for high-frequency sound than for lowfrequency
sound.
270 Chapter 7
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
7.1.3 Mechanism of Acoustic Absorption
When selecting acoustic materials for noise reduction, it is important for the
designer to be aware of the mechanisms involved in absorption of the
acoustic energy in the material. In addition, it is important to know the
frequency distribution of the sound in the room, in order that the appropriate
sound absorbing material may be matched with the acoustic field. A
different material would be selected to absorb low-frequency sound than
would be chosen to absorb high-frequency sound, generally. Let us consider
three cases.
Porous felt-like sound absorbing materials are commercially available
as mats, boards, or preformed components. Materials of manufacture
include glass fibers, mineral or organic fibers, textiles or open cell foams,
usually polyurethane foams. Representative curves for a porous felt-like
material are shown in Fig. 7-1. It is noted that the absorption coefficient
is smaller at low frequencies (250 Hz or lower), but is near unity at high
Room Acoustics 271
FIGURE 7-1 Surface absorption coefficient _ for formboard, a porous felt-like
material.
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
frequencies (1000Hz or higher). The porous felt-like material is more effective
in absorbing sound at higher frequencies than at lower frequencies.
The mechanismfor absorption of acoustic energy for the porous materials
is the fluid frictional energy dissipation between the air and the solid
fibers. At high frequencies, the energy dissipation is larger because the particle
velocity is larger than at low frequencies. The expansion and contraction
of the air within the irregular spaces of the material also result in
momentum losses for the air. The data presented in Fig. 7-1 also illustrate
that the absorption coefficients are larger for the thicker material, which has
more surface area for energy dissipation.
Unperforated panel absorbers involve one or more layers of metal or
plywood with an air space behind the panel. Representative curves for a
plywood panel are shown in Fig. 7-2. It is observed that the absorption
coefficient is larger at the lower frequencies (500Hz and below). The absorption
coefficient is also larger for the thinner panel. The absorption coefficient
may be increased by placing a porous acoustic absorbing material in
the air space behind the panel.
The absorption for the unperforated panel is related to the transmission
loss for the panel. As discussed in Chapter 4, the transmission loss for a
272 Chapter 7
FIGURE 7-2 Surface absorption coefficient _ for plywood panel with a 2-inch air
space behind the panel.
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
panel in the stiffness-controlled region of acoustic behavior, encountered at
low frequencies, decreases as the frequency is increased.
The absorption characteristics of perforated panels backed by an air
space are illustrated in Fig. 7-3. The graph is shown for 1/2-inch (12.7 mm)
thick perforated plywood panels with 3/16-inch (4.8 mm) diameter holes.
The panel is backed with a 2.25 inch (57 mm) air space filled with a porous
acoustic material. The absorption coefficient is largest in the mid-range of
frequencies (250–500 Hz).
When the thickness of the panel is small, the absorption is primarily
due to dissipation of the acoustic energy within the acoustic material behind
the panel. For larger panel thickness, the perforated panel acts as a resonant
cavity-type absorber (Helmholtz resonator). In this case, the absorption is
greatest around the resonant frequency for the cavity. For example, the
resonant frequency for the perforations in the panel with 11% open area
is approximately 300 Hz.
In summary, we see that if we wish to absorb noise mainly in the highfrequency
range (above about 1000 Hz), we should use a porous acoustic
material on the surface. If we wish to absorb sound mainly in the lowfrequency
range (below about 250 Hz), we could use an unperforated
panel with an air space behind the panel. For absorption of sound mainly
Room Acoustics 273
FIGURE 7-3 Surface absorption coefficient _ for perforated plywood panel backed
by a porous absorbent material. Curve A, 11% open area; curve B, 16.5% open area.
Copyright © 2003 Marcel Dekker, Inc.
in the intermediate frequency range (250 –1000 Hz), we would select a perforated
panel with an absorbent material behind the panel. We would need
to use combinations of these materials for effective absorption of sound over
all frequencies.
7.1.4 Average Absorption Coe⁄cient
In general, the various surfaces in a room will not have the same value of
surface absorption coefficient at the same frequency. In this case, we need to
determine an average value for the absorption coefficient for use in acoustic
design. The appropriate average surface absorption coefficient is the
surface-weighted average:
__ ј
__jSj
So
(7-2)
The quantity So is the total surface area of the room. When people or
furniture are present in the room, the absorption will be increased. To
take this effect into account, the total absorption capacity р_SЮ for the
people and furniture is added in the numerator of Eq. (7-2), but the surface
area of the people and furniture is not included in the total surface area of
the room So in the denominator.
The subjective acoustic characteristics of a room may be estimated
from the value of the average surface absorption coefficient. The subjective
perceptions are listed in Table 7-1 (Beranek, 1954).
Популярные книги
- Старинные занимательные задачи
- Медоносные растения
- Algebratic geometry
- Workbook in Higher Algebra
- Математика Древнего Китая
- Finite element analysis
- Mathematics and art
- Fields and galois theory
- Пчеловодство
- Black Holes
Популярные статьи
- Higher-Order Finite Element Methods
- Электровакуумные приборы
- Riemann zeta functionS
- Универсальная открытая архитектурно-строительная система зданий серии Б1.020.1-71
- Complex Analysis 2002-2003
- Пример расчета прочности елементов, стыков и узлов несущего каркаса здания
- Составы, вещества и материалы для огнезащитыметаллических консрукций и изделий
- CMOS Technology
- Рекомендации по расчету и конструированию сборных железобетонных колонн каркасов зданий серии Б1.020.1-7 с плоскими стыками ВИНСТ
- Советы старого пчеловода